Ohiostandard (talk | contribs) →Hi, Eridu: strange attractors |
Tentontunic (talk | contribs) →You are being discussed: new section |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::Oh, your big gob is a valuable addition to the discussion. Besides, political articles are a vortex of locally-augmented gravity for anyone who cares about such things. Kind of like a black hole that way. They definitely pull you in, whether you will or no. What's the other analogy from physics, "strange attractors"? That'd be a good description, too. I just corrected your indentation from flush left, again, though. ;-) Cheers! – <font face="Cambria">[[User:Ohiostandard|<font color="teal">'''OhioStandard'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Ohiostandard|talk]])</font> 14:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
::Oh, your big gob is a valuable addition to the discussion. Besides, political articles are a vortex of locally-augmented gravity for anyone who cares about such things. Kind of like a black hole that way. They definitely pull you in, whether you will or no. What's the other analogy from physics, "strange attractors"? That'd be a good description, too. I just corrected your indentation from flush left, again, though. ;-) Cheers! – <font face="Cambria">[[User:Ohiostandard|<font color="teal">'''OhioStandard'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Ohiostandard|talk]])</font> 14:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
== You are being discussed == |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ERIDU-DREAMING] Here. [[User:Tentontunic|Tentontunic]] ([[User talk:Tentontunic|talk]]) 16:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:30, 26 February 2011
ERIDU-DREAMING
Hi, Eridu
Hi, Eridu. I appreciate your comments at the talk page for Right-wing politics, but would you please read up on how to use indentation in threaded discourse, and try to remember to use it consistently? It's not required by policy to do so ( so, I think, to avoid discouraging the newcomers ) but always beginning your posts at the extreme left is not only inconsistent with what I understand your political orientation to be ;-) but it also prevents anyone who wants to post below you from using indentation to indicate who he's replying to. Posting at "flush left" forces everyone else to appear to be replying only to you, in other words, unless they take the time to figure out who it was you were replying to yourself, and to indent your post accordingly. Btw, if you'd like to reply you can do so right here, as I've temporarily watchlisted this page to avoid missing that. Thanks, – OhioStandard (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- OK I will try to bear it in mind! To be honest it was not my intention to get involved at all but.....well me and my big gob. Feel free to correct any indentation Wikipedia faux pas I have made. If I fail to resist putting my oar in in the future I will try to do better in the future.
- ERIDU-DREAMING (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, your big gob is a valuable addition to the discussion. Besides, political articles are a vortex of locally-augmented gravity for anyone who cares about such things. Kind of like a black hole that way. They definitely pull you in, whether you will or no. What's the other analogy from physics, "strange attractors"? That'd be a good description, too. I just corrected your indentation from flush left, again, though. ;-) Cheers! – OhioStandard (talk) 14:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
You are being discussed
[1] Here. Tentontunic (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)