clean up |
GizzyCatBella (talk | contribs) →Collaboration in Poland: new section Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=813406725 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=813406725 --> |
||
== Collaboration in Poland == |
|||
'''Careful with reverts''', you could report FR for this |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=837694580&oldid=837693161&diffmode=source] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=840985795&oldid=840859041&diffmode=source] instead of reverting him. Here are the diff he reverted without gaining prior consensus: |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=842613857&oldid=842594018&diffmode=source] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=837694580&oldid=837693161&diffmode=source] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=840985795&oldid=840859041&diffmode=source] |
|||
And here are his previous attempts of inserting this into the article. |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=837898354&oldid=837865240&diffmode=source] |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland&diff=837693066&oldid=837691610&diffmode=source] |
|||
Read this [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Collaboration_in_German-occupied_Poland] |
|||
* '''Consensus required:''' All editors must obtain [[wikipedia:CONSENSUS|consensus]] on the talk page of this article before reinstating ''any edits that have been challenged (via reversion)'' If in doubt, don't make the edit. |
|||
You may still report him before your recent revert is used against you if you have energy for it or I can do it for you if you want.[[User:GizzyCatBella|GizzyCatBella]] ([[User talk:GizzyCatBella|talk]]) 16:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:34, 2 June 2018
Nice work
Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for all the recent work you've put into the Poland article. It's a good step in removing the issues that often plague Polish topics on Wikipedia. --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Samotny Wędrowiec, many thanks! I figured a bit of grammar fixing was in order. :D --E-960 (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Response
Sorry for not responding earlier (re: this) - I'm glad you placed a discussion on each of the talk pages but the wording makes it seem as if you're suggesting it when in fact you already changed it. Still, the replacement maps are mostly as good if not better. The only one one where it really didn't improve the article was at Elbe Germanic peoples (this was reverted by Bermicourt), since the new map didn't contain any mention of Elbe Germanic and the original map was integral to the article. Since most of them are not contested I'd say it worked out. Prinsgezinde (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, E-960. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Collaboration in Poland
Careful with reverts, you could report FR for this [1] [2] instead of reverting him. Here are the diff he reverted without gaining prior consensus: [3] [4] [5] And here are his previous attempts of inserting this into the article. [6] [7] Read this [8]
- Consensus required: All editors must obtain consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion) If in doubt, don't make the edit.
You may still report him before your recent revert is used against you if you have energy for it or I can do it for you if you want.GizzyCatBella (talk) 16:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC)