Durr-e-shehwar (talk | contribs) |
Jimmy Aneja (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
Your signature as seen [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AKaran_Singh_Grover&type=revision&diff=676316059&oldid=676314139 here] currently links to [[User talk:Durr-E-Shehwar]], not [[User talk:Durr-e-shehwar]]. Since links are case sensitive (excepting the first letter), people cannot use that link to find your talk page. Please correct the capitalization in your signature's link so that it points to the right place. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 07:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
Your signature as seen [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AKaran_Singh_Grover&type=revision&diff=676316059&oldid=676314139 here] currently links to [[User talk:Durr-E-Shehwar]], not [[User talk:Durr-e-shehwar]]. Since links are case sensitive (excepting the first letter), people cannot use that link to find your talk page. Please correct the capitalization in your signature's link so that it points to the right place. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 07:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Karan Singh Grover]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Jimmy Aneja|Jimmy Aneja]] ([[User talk:Jimmy Aneja|talk]]) 11:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:13, 5 September 2015
October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Karishma Tanna has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karishma Tanna was changed by Durr-e-shehwar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935595 on 2014-10-10T16:48:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Sehban Azim has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Karan Singh Grover, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Images
I have tagged File:Karan Singh Grover at the Theatric Launch of Alone 2015.jpg and File:Karan Singh Grover Alone Movie Stil 2015.jpg for deletion as copyright violations over at the Commons. There's no indication either has been released under the free licenses you claimed. Re-adding those images to a Wikipedia article after you've been told they're copyright violations is not a good idea. Huon (talk) 13:33, 1 February 2015 (UTC) I am confused other photos from bollywoodhungama from the same events have been approved of? then why not these?
- Probably those other images should be deleted as well. Can you provide links, please? Huon (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
here u go https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bipasha_Basu.jpg
Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Durr-e-shehwar. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. My name is Howicus, and I've been an editor here for some time. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
If you're working on creating a new article, you should take a look at this page on your first article. Also, this page has instructions on how to cite sources, complete with videos.
If all this Wikicode is a little overwhelming, this cheatsheet may help untangle it.
If you're looking for a tutorial of sorts, The Wikipedia Adventure is a good option.
And if you need more help, I'd recommend getting live help at the Wikipedia help chat channel: click here to join. Additionally, you could ask me on my talk page, try the Teahouse (a help page for new users) or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome, and have fun editing! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Arti Singh
The article Arti Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Actress who is not notable and also has a not inherited issue.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 01:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Chander 18:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 15 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Radhika Madan page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sanjeet Bedi, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://unlimitedzz.com/sanjeevani-actor-sanjeet-bedi-dies-following-a-brain-ailment/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Durr-e-shehwar, and welcome to Wikipedia. I see that after receiving the note above, you copy-pasted additional content with this edit, taking material from this blog. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Dr Armaan Malik
Please refrain from adding un-encyclopedic material as you did here. Not everything we read on internet can be written on Wikipedia. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Edit War
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Speedy deletion nomination of Armaan Malik (fictional character)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Armaan Malik (fictional character) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/Small-screens-heartthrobs-who-return-on-fans-demands/articleshow/17322971.cms. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Armaan Malik (fictional character). Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Armaan Malik (fictional character). Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Armaan Malik (fictional character) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Durr-e-shehwar reported by User:AKS.9955 (Result: ). Thank you. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Armaan Malik (fictional character) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armaan Malik (fictional character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armaan Malik (fictional character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Asad Ahmed Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gul Khan
- Karan Singh Grover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gul Khan
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
re your edit summary
regarding your edit summary here 1) it is manifestly inaccurate in that I have hundreds of pages from which i am removing fancrap, but 2) that fact that at KSG I have to remove and re-remove and re-re-remove fancrap means that there are a dozen other articles out there that I no longer have time to get to. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
I disagree, you are being absolutely rude, by calling it 'fancrap' all of this stuff is reported by the media and hence it is on the page, nothing is unsourced, far more worse and biased articles out there that you do not care about, regards -- Durr e Shehwar aka DES 05:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Verifiability#Verifiability_does_not_guarantee_inclusion Having a source is the minimum requirement for content, not something that guarantees inclusion. we are writing an encyclopedia article, not creating a fansite -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 06:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
you seem to have an issue with only this page, if that article is a fansite then all articles on wikipedia on celebrities are like that, go and fix them all, as far as I know most personalities have almost everything listed in the space personal life, especially something like tattoos-- Durr e Shehwar aka DES 17:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Your signature
Your signature as seen here currently links to User talk:Durr-E-Shehwar, not User talk:Durr-e-shehwar. Since links are case sensitive (excepting the first letter), people cannot use that link to find your talk page. Please correct the capitalization in your signature's link so that it points to the right place. Huon (talk) 07:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Karan Singh Grover shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jimmy Aneja (talk) 11:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)