→Reported: new section |
You have been blocked from editing. (TW) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
At ANI for edit warring [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Dralgos_reported_by_User:Calthinus_(Result:_)|here]]. You should strongly consider self-reverting on both pages; you have already received enough warning on both.--[[User:Calthinus|Calthinus]] ([[User talk:Calthinus|talk]]) 18:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
At ANI for edit warring [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Dralgos_reported_by_User:Calthinus_(Result:_)|here]]. You should strongly consider self-reverting on both pages; you have already received enough warning on both.--[[User:Calthinus|Calthinus]] ([[User talk:Calthinus|talk]]) 18:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
== April 2018 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for violating 1RR; see [[WP:GS/SCW&ISIL]], as you did at [[:Douma chemical attack]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 19:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
Revision as of 19:31, 27 April 2018
Welcome!
(talk page stalker) If you want to wp:ping someone such as I, use {{yo|Jim1138}} Your message ~~~~ The four tildes "~~~~" becomes your signature. (leave out the nowiki stuff). You should save the Yo, talk, and signature with one "Save changes" click or it may not work. No need to use Yo on a person's own talk page, they are automatically notified. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
@Jim1138: Thanks!!! (Dralgos (talk) 08:43, 22 October 2016 (UTC))
Tools
See Help:Reverting. Specifically on that page, see WP:UNDO for info on undoing several edits at once. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
DIscussion that needs your input:
There's a discussion Here that you are invited to contribute to. Thank you. --Jayron32 13:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Edit warring at Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal
Hey, FWIW, you're running up against the three revert limit at Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal. here, here, here, and here, where you undid the same edit 4 different times. Please do not revert again, or you may be blocked. --Jayron32 16:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
@Jayron32: Your edits were poor and lacking. Please refrain from making rushed and thoughtless edits in the future.
- You are dangerously close to an ANI notice, Draglos. Re-read WP:CIVILITY, for starters.50.111.3.17 (talk) 04:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
DS notice
- You remove significant well sourced content without even explaining anything on article talk page [1]. My very best wishes (talk) 22:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- And now sourcing to RT [2]? My very best wishes (talk) 22:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
@My very best wishes: The content you added was utter nonsense.
- When I posted this DS notice, you responded by making this edit. Do you really believe that RT (TV network) is a good source to support statement that "Boris Johnson lied"? This is actually a WP:BLP violation, among other things.My very best wishes (talk) 22:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
@My very best wishes: Dude Boris Johnson said it in a filmed German TV interview!! There's a video.
- You must have multiple RS which tell directly that "politician X lied" and use these RS in your edit. WP:BLP is also covered by discretionary sanctions. My very best wishes (talk) 22:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
@My very best wishes: Are you high?
[3] - When someone disputes your edit by removing it, this is your responsibility to justify inclusion on article talk page and get WP:Consensus. I removed it because your edit was wrong per WP:GEVAL. My very best wishes (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.- MrX 🖋 22:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
A simultaneous violation of 1RR and 3RR on two pages
Look, you just violated 3RR here and 1RR here. Self-revert on both pages please. My very best wishes (talk) 18:23, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Reported
At ANI for edit warring here. You should strongly consider self-reverting on both pages; you have already received enough warning on both.--Calthinus (talk) 18:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN talk to me 19:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)