Sean.hoyland (talk | contribs) |
→Arab-Israeli sanctions notification: new section |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
--[[User:Dorpwnz|Dorpwnz]] ([[User talk:Dorpwnz|talk]]) 18:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
--[[User:Dorpwnz|Dorpwnz]] ([[User talk:Dorpwnz|talk]]) 18:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Multiple editors evidently do not agree with your assessment that it is valid information. Please read [[WP:BRD]]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Sean.hoyland|<font color="#000">Sean.hoyland</font>]]''' - '''[[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]'''</small> 18:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
:Multiple editors evidently do not agree with your assessment that it is valid information. Please read [[WP:BRD]]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User:Sean.hoyland|<font color="#000">Sean.hoyland</font>]]''' - '''[[User talk:Sean.hoyland|talk]]'''</small> 18:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Arab-Israeli sanctions notification == |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
| The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the [[Arab-Israeli conflict]]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision|Final decision]]" section of the decision page. |
|||
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]], with the appropriate sections of [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures]], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. |
|||
| Ambox warning pn.svg |
|||
| icon size = 40px |
|||
}}<!-- This message is derived from Template:Uw-sanctions -->--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 18:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:48, 25 October 2013
October 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Palestinian people. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. AsceticRosé 17:06, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
What are you talking about? i gave some sources from inside of the palestnian leadership denying the existence of the palestian people,no spam,no removel of information.
please be more clear
dor --Dorpwnz (talk) 17:10, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- That article and all content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict broadly construed is covered by WP:1RR. See the WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES section at the top of article's talk page. You broke the 1RR restriction. Editors who break that rule are reported and usually blocked, so if you are planning to continue editing in the topic area, you shouldn't do that again. Sean.hoyland - talk 17:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
You are wrong.
i have had my information deleted by both Malik Shahbazz and asceticrose. more than one reversion by two people. they should not do this. take care --Dorpwnz (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please read WP:1RR. The rule applies to people on an individual basis. Two people making 1 revert each is not a violation. One person making 2 reverts is a violation. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Edit warring
Please be more clear. i have had my article edited by Both ArcticRose and Malik Shabazz without any explaination while i am giving valid information about the actual case. i really have no interest in edit warring /internet gangsters or whatever, i just want to provide valid information without getting it deleted with NO EXPLAINATION ATTACHED!
--Dorpwnz (talk) 18:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Multiple editors evidently do not agree with your assessment that it is valid information. Please read WP:BRD. Sean.hoyland - talk 18:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Arab-Israeli sanctions notification
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.