Hodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs) A question |
Hodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs) RR warring |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==A question== |
==A question== |
||
Is that you who edits under IP address "217.117.80.2"? If this is you, could you please edit only as user DonaldDuck? Doing otherwise is contrary to WP policies. Sorry if that is not you. Thank you. [[User:Biophys|Biophys]] 16:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC) |
Is that you who edits under IP address "217.117.80.2"? If this is you, could you please edit only as user DonaldDuck? Doing otherwise is contrary to WP policies. Sorry if that is not you. Thank you. [[User:Biophys|Biophys]] 16:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
==RR warring== |
|||
You appear to be involved in RR warring in article [[Putinism]] |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Putinism&action=history]. Please be advised about [[WP:3RR]] rule.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] 16:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:55, 9 October 2007
Your cleanups are too drastic! Donald Duck. --Ludvikus 12:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Seemingly, I have mixed two different persons. So I have moved everything about Alexander to Alexander Spiridovich and left everything about Arthur in Arthur Cherep-Spiridovich.DonaldDuck 13:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC) First is more or less known - some of his books were republished recently. Second, conspiracy theorist, is completely obscure. I have a great doubts that he was a count and a general. I'm not sure if he is a real person or pen name.DonaldDuck 13:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- I know Arthur. It's Alexander who is unknown. Please read the talk page before you do anything else. Best, --Ludvikus 14:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- OK. I double checked. These are two different people (Alexander Spiridovich). --Ludvikus 14:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Are you ignoring her? --Ludvikus 12:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't understand your question. What do you mean by "ignoring her"?DonaldDuck 12:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia policies
I have to comment this your edit: [1]. The term "putinism" in this article was defined as in 15+ reliable sources. You provided an alternative (different) definition of this term supported by zero sources/references. The insertion of unreferenced personal opinions in WP is explicitly forbidden per WP:NOR policy. At the same time, you deleted referenced views, which is also unacceptable per WP:NPOV policy. If you provide any English language sources of using "putinism" term in your sense, that would qualify as "alternative use" of the term and could be described as such. So, could you please follow core WP policies? Please also take a look at WP:Source - we are looking here for "verifiability, not truth", and the sources are not required to be available online.Biophys 14:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a collection of links and quotes and not a tool for promotion of some political agenda. And it is not a tool for promotion of hatred and conspiracy theories, like "all Russians are working for KGB". As for alternative meaning, please look into ru:ПутинизмDonaldDuck 15:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please see my reply at talk page of Putinism. There are no sources claiming this to be a conspiracy theory. What "hatred" are you talking about and what "political agenda"? If you think there are too many quotes, this is something to discuss at talk page of the corresponding article. If you think that some materials are not about "Putinism", you should also discuss this first, rather than delete everything you do not like. This article represented views by different experts on the "Putinism" subject. Each view was clearly attributed. If you think some views were not represented, please include them with references per WP:Source.Biophys 15:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Clearly, you do not unerstand WP:NOR policy based on this your comment and edit [2]. "Original research" is something that is NOT supported by reliable sources per WP:Source (as text inserted by you). The previous text (deleted by you) has been supported by multiple reliable sources. Hence it was not OR. It does not mean that views you deleted are "truth". The article did not tell they are "truth". Please note that all views have been clearly attributed to their sources in this article.Biophys 16:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
A question
Is that you who edits under IP address "217.117.80.2"? If this is you, could you please edit only as user DonaldDuck? Doing otherwise is contrary to WP policies. Sorry if that is not you. Thank you. Biophys 16:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
RR warring
You appear to be involved in RR warring in article Putinism [3]. Please be advised about WP:3RR rule.Biophys 16:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)