Content deleted Content added
Maxamegalon2000 (talk | contribs) Of Survivor & Original Research |
→Of Survivor & Original Research: Reply to your message |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Image Tagging for [[:Image:Glebova.gif]]== |
==Image Tagging for [[:Image:Glebova.gif]]== |
||
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Glebova.gif]]'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. |
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Glebova.gif]]'''. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. |
||
Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
I hope you realize what you are doing to my watchlist. ;) --[[User:Maxamegalon2000|Maxamegalon2000]] 19:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC) |
I hope you realize what you are doing to my watchlist. ;) --[[User:Maxamegalon2000|Maxamegalon2000]] 19:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&diff=66403824&oldid=66402490 your message]: I believe it was reverted because your tagging all the Elimination Vote sections for Original Research was a little too broad. While there may be sections that might have NPOV problems, I wouldn't call it Original Research. The Elimination Vote sections generally describe the reasons as presented on the show and the episodes do a fairly good job of showing why somebody was voted out. If you have issues with certain summaries, you should tag and/or fix them. But I think tagging everything Original Research was a bit much. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] 04:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:56, 29 July 2006
Image Tagging for Image:Glebova.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Glebova.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 02:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Of Survivor & Original Research
I hope you realize what you are doing to my watchlist. ;) --Maxamegalon2000 19:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Re your message: I believe it was reverted because your tagging all the Elimination Vote sections for Original Research was a little too broad. While there may be sections that might have NPOV problems, I wouldn't call it Original Research. The Elimination Vote sections generally describe the reasons as presented on the show and the episodes do a fairly good job of showing why somebody was voted out. If you have issues with certain summaries, you should tag and/or fix them. But I think tagging everything Original Research was a bit much. -- Gogo Dodo 04:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)