Content deleted Content added
→break: Silo hypothesis? |
|||
Line 329: | Line 329: | ||
:::We also have other directly contradictory statements. James said [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2016-02-03/In_focus here] that "The board approved the Knight Foundation grant. I supported its approval following pressure which included comments about potentially removing members of the Board." And Jimmy said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJimbo_Wales&type=revision&diff=704228924&oldid=704223871 here] that there were absolutely no such threats. These kinds of contradictions are not resolve-able with the "different parts of the elephant" hypothesis. Believe me, I tried. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 20:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
:::We also have other directly contradictory statements. James said [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2016-02-03/In_focus here] that "The board approved the Knight Foundation grant. I supported its approval following pressure which included comments about potentially removing members of the Board." And Jimmy said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJimbo_Wales&type=revision&diff=704228924&oldid=704223871 here] that there were absolutely no such threats. These kinds of contradictions are not resolve-able with the "different parts of the elephant" hypothesis. Believe me, I tried. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 20:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::: Re: ''"Jimmys' refusal to give me straight answers on his Talk page"'', it should be noted that several editors (myself among them) on that page are of the opinion that he did give you a straight answer, but you are not willing to accept it. That doesn't mean that we are right, but it should be noted that there are different opinions on this. Re: "''These kinds of contradictions are not resolve-able with the "different parts of the elephant" hypothesis''", they may be resolvable by the silo hypothesis. If someone told Doc James something when Jimbo was not present, that could account for some of the contradictions. Doc James, when you say "pressure which included comments about potentially removing members of the board" was this pressure applied in front of the entire board? Was it clear or ambiguous? Was Jimbo there? Does any other board member collaborate this claim? --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 21:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
:::: Re: ''"Jimmys' refusal to give me straight answers on his Talk page"'', it should be noted that several editors (myself among them) on that page are of the opinion that he did give you a straight answer, but you are not willing to accept it. That doesn't mean that we are right, but it should be noted that there are different opinions on this. Re: "''These kinds of contradictions are not resolve-able with the "different parts of the elephant" hypothesis''", they may be resolvable by the silo hypothesis. If someone told Doc James something when Jimbo was not present, that could account for some of the contradictions. Doc James, when you say "pressure which included comments about potentially removing members of the board" was this pressure applied in front of the entire board? Was it clear or ambiguous? Was Jimbo there? Does any other board member collaborate this claim? --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 21:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::::Yes Jimbo was their. And it was clear. I would imagine other board members would confirm this. [[User:Doc James|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Doc James|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Doc James|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Doc James|email]]) 21:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Meningococcemia == |
== Meningococcemia == |