Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
I blocked [[User:DoRDalternate]]. I don't have the ability to do a CU block, so I tagged them as "suspected". Feel free to do whatever you want with the tag, including removing it. Funny how they impersonate you and go after me.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 14:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC) |
I blocked [[User:DoRDalternate]]. I don't have the ability to do a CU block, so I tagged them as "suspected". Feel free to do whatever you want with the tag, including removing it. Funny how they impersonate you and go after me.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 14:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
:It's him, of course, so I changed the tag. —[[User:DoRD|DoRD]] ([[User talk:DoRD|talk]]) 15:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC) |
:It's him, of course, so I changed the tag. —[[User:DoRD|DoRD]] ([[User talk:DoRD|talk]]) 15:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
== SockPuppet Investigation Immediately closed by an administrator when the accused requested him to close it- Need Immediate attention == |
|||
Hi [[User:DoRD]], |
|||
I had opened a sock puppet investigation on two users Shriram and Lihaas on India General election page- [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Shriram]]. One of them suddently made a request to another Administrator ( [[User_talk:Soorejmg#What_does_.22edit_warring.22_mean.3F|RequestMadeHere]] ) to close the investigation and the page was immediately closed. |
|||
Excerpt- |
|||
User:JamesBWatson, I would think canvassing around for his view is turning disruptive. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shriram) How about a topic ban?Lihaas (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC) |
|||
The immediate closure of topic looks suspicious. Please do the necessary. |
|||
Thanks |
|||
[[User:Soorejmg|Soorejmg]] ([[User talk:Soorejmg|talk]]) 15:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:59, 10 April 2014
|
||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
NYIT
Hi, thanks for keeping up with the sockpuppets editing NYIT. However, each day new socks are being created to make disruptive edits. Can the NYIT page be semi-protected to prevent new users from editing the page for the time being? MlaneNYIT (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, please disregard request as page is now semi-protected. MlaneNYIT (talk) 03:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible new sockmaster
Can you please help out on this SPI case? It's a really big mess, and it's giving me a headache just trying to sort it out. Thanks. LightandDark2000 (talk) 09:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- @LightandDark2000: As noted above, I am traveling at the moment, and do not have the necessary tools for an involved investigation such as this. —DoRD (talk) 02:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oh. Okay. Well, hopefully we'll have this all sorted out before the sockmaster can cause any further damage. LightandDark2000 (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Re our IRC chat
Hi, DoRD. Not to crowd you or anything, but did you get a chance to take a look at this mess? Bishonen | talk 20:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC).
Semi?
Semi, perhaps? Bishonen | talk 13:21, 6 April 2014 (UTC).
- Heh...I just did. —DoRD (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Another one
I blocked User:DoRDalternate. I don't have the ability to do a CU block, so I tagged them as "suspected". Feel free to do whatever you want with the tag, including removing it. Funny how they impersonate you and go after me.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
SockPuppet Investigation Immediately closed by an administrator when the accused requested him to close it- Need Immediate attention
Hi User:DoRD,
I had opened a sock puppet investigation on two users Shriram and Lihaas on India General election page- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Shriram. One of them suddently made a request to another Administrator ( RequestMadeHere ) to close the investigation and the page was immediately closed.
Excerpt- User:JamesBWatson, I would think canvassing around for his view is turning disruptive. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shriram) How about a topic ban?Lihaas (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
The immediate closure of topic looks suspicious. Please do the necessary.