better reception at WikiBooks |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Internal -?== |
==Internal -?== |
||
See [[User:Dnessett/Sturm-Liouville]] and [[User:Dnessett/Legendre]]. We do not have article titles that begin "internal -". I suspect that these two articles may be too technical for a general encyclopedia. Seek advice on the talk pages of the relevant articles for each function. Invite an established editor to move them back into the (article) namespace rather than doing it yourself. Alternatively, you may find the articles get a better reception at [[Wikibooks]]. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|Talk]] | [[special:contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 16:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC) |
See [[User:Dnessett/Sturm-Liouville]] and [[User:Dnessett/Legendre]]. We do not have article titles that begin "internal -". I suspect that these two articles may be too technical for a general encyclopedia. Seek advice on the talk pages of the relevant articles for each function. Invite an established editor to move them back into the (article) namespace rather than doing it yourself. Alternatively, you may find the articles get a better reception at [[Wikibooks]]. — [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] ([[User talk:RHaworth|Talk]] | [[special:contributions/RHaworth|contribs]]) 16:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
Sorry. I am new to Wikipedia. I forgot to prepend those pages with User:Dnessett. I have created the appropriate pages as subpages of my user account. So, go ahead and delete the "Internal" pages. In regards to your suggestion that I "invite an established editor to move the them back into the (article) namespace rather than doing it yourself" I left a message on Talk:Associated Legendre function/Comments suggesting adding a proof for the orthogonality of the Associated Legendre Functions. My contribution to the Comments page was the first in 2 years. I have not heard back from anyone. I would be happy to work with an established editor for the Associated Legendre Function page if I could find one. [[User:Dnessett|Dnessett]] ([[User talk:Dnessett#top|talk]]) 16:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:08, 11 April 2009
Internal -?
See User:Dnessett/Sturm-Liouville and User:Dnessett/Legendre. We do not have article titles that begin "internal -". I suspect that these two articles may be too technical for a general encyclopedia. Seek advice on the talk pages of the relevant articles for each function. Invite an established editor to move them back into the (article) namespace rather than doing it yourself. Alternatively, you may find the articles get a better reception at Wikibooks. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry. I am new to Wikipedia. I forgot to prepend those pages with User:Dnessett. I have created the appropriate pages as subpages of my user account. So, go ahead and delete the "Internal" pages. In regards to your suggestion that I "invite an established editor to move the them back into the (article) namespace rather than doing it yourself" I left a message on Talk:Associated Legendre function/Comments suggesting adding a proof for the orthogonality of the Associated Legendre Functions. My contribution to the Comments page was the first in 2 years. I have not heard back from anyone. I would be happy to work with an established editor for the Associated Legendre Function page if I could find one. Dnessett (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)