added comment |
|||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
<s>Hi, I was wondering if you could delete my old user page, [[User:Gbambino]]. I've opened up a new account for various reasons and would like to have the old one completely shut down. I'm only assuming you have the ability to do such a thing, but if you don't, I'd be appreciative if you could tell me who can. Cheers.</s> --[[User:Gmbambino|Gmbambino]] 22:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC) |
<s>Hi, I was wondering if you could delete my old user page, [[User:Gbambino]]. I've opened up a new account for various reasons and would like to have the old one completely shut down. I'm only assuming you have the ability to do such a thing, but if you don't, I'd be appreciative if you could tell me who can. Cheers.</s> --[[User:Gmbambino|Gmbambino]] 22:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Never mind, I've found the information I was looking for. --[[User:Gmbambino|Gmbambino]] 22:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC) |
:Never mind, I've found the information I was looking for. --[[User:Gmbambino|Gmbambino]] 22:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
==[[User:Amoruso|Amoruso]] shouldn't have been blocked for [[WP:3RR]] violations, as he was reverting edits by [[User:RedMC|a banned user]]== |
|||
Please see [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#This_block_is_wholly_unjustified_by_the_3RR.2C_and_appears_to_be_inconsistent_with_WP:BAN.23Enforcement_by_reverting_edits]], where I have provided a compelling justification for unblocking [[User:Amoruso|Amoruso]]. [[User:John254|John254]] 22:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:39, 12 December 2006
Old talk at /Archive1, /Archive2, /Archive3, /Archive4, /Archive5, /Archive6, /Archive7, /Archive8, /Archive9, /Archive10, /Archive11, /Archive12, /Archive 13, /Archive 14, /Archive15, /Archive16
This case is now closed and the results have been posted above.
- BhaiSaab (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned for one year.
- Hkelkar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) editing under any name or anonymous ip is banned from Wikipedia for one year.
- TerryJ-Ho (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned for a year for personal attacks, disruptive comments, edit-warring and incivility.
- BhaiSaab is placed on probation for an indefinite period. He may be banned from any article or set of articles which he disrupts. All bans to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.
- Hkelkar and socks is placed on probation for an indefinite period. He may be banned from any article or set of articles which he disrupts. All bans to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.
- TerryJ-Ho is placed on probation for an indefinite period. He may be banned from any article or set of articles which he disrupts. All bans to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.
For the Arbitration committee, Cowman109Talk 06:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Amoruso
Hello D. I am here because Amoruso has requested an unblock. I see you blocked for 3RR (which he didn't trip, making his 4th revert after 24 hours and four minutes) and incivility (which you don't specify). Would you specify what incivility you spoke of? Thx. - crz crztalk 23:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- See my response on the noticeboard: [1]. Four minutes is immaterial for someone who has been blocked for 3RR before. Dmcdevit·t 23:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I did see eventually find your explanation of the alleged incivility, as I took pains to record here. If you don't like his warring or his blatant POV - then start an RFC or discuss a block for ANI - but I don't think you should be co-opting 3RR, a very specific thing, to suit those purposes. Further discussion on AN3, I think. Thanks. - crz crztalk 13:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- I appreciate your opinion, but I am already fully aware of how little you like me. I did nothing wrong, reponding to a bona fide unblock request and properly soliciting your input. I do not edit Israel-related articles, do not have a history with Amoruso, and there's nothing improper in my actions. Yes, he is an edit warrior, but AN3 is not the forum to punish him for it unless he breaks 3RR. Please solicit consensus for such a block in the regular fashion. This is all I stand for. - čřž čřžtalk 20:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
I wouldn't characterize that as "fair criticism", however. You have essentially accused me of enabling edit warriors. And you do a history of disliking me. That was but one diff. - crz crztalk 21:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
DRVNote
User:Xiner/Userboxes/Pro-Life Pro-Abortion on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of User:Xiner/Userboxes/Pro-Life Pro-Abortion. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Xiner 02:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC).
CheckUser request
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/200.119.236.93. This request, which I submitted earlier today, has been declined by Essjay with the suggestion that I might present it to "the Arbitration Committee, which has more leeway in their investigating." Since the situation doesn't involve a dispute that could be arbitrated, I don't know precisely how I would go about doing that, or even whether you would consider the suggestion well-taken. Among the arbitrators I see you most often on the RfCU page, so I'd welcome your attention to or thoughts on the matter. Regards, Newyorkbrad 02:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Voila
Per your request here, voila, Unlikely. Also, very long talk page, slow loading = Dmcdevit should sign up for EssjayBot III. ;) Essjay (Talk) 05:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! Now I am left to ponder why a purple bowling ball signifies "unlikely". ;-) Dmcdevit·t 09:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Regarding your T1 deletion of User:Xiner/Userboxes/Pro-Life Pro-Abortion
I know you are not a fan of userboxes, but may I request you reconsider the speedy deletion? What makes this userbox so obnoxious that it warrants speedy deletion rather than taking it to a MfD? CharonX/talk 16:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Desyopping rationale
Just to be clear...these are the reasons I am to be desyopped?--MONGO 22:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Unblock request from User talk:Nsaum75
Perhaps you want to take a look at it? The autoblock was caused by {{checkuserblock}} on WearCleanDrawers and I am forwarding this to you following what you have stated in the block message. --WinHunter (talk) 05:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Question
Your opinion on this ? [2]. Since you have struck out several votes, is this a policy somewhere ? Haphar 08:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's common sense. Banned users' membership in the community is officially revoked. We shouldn't count their votes just for the sake of process. Dmcdevit·t 09:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- So are we saying the ban implies all their past votes and records are also revoked ? Haphar 09:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Any input on this user's unblock request? I have no familiarity with the events leading to the block, so was hoping you'd be able to shed some light on matters. Thanks in advance. Luna Santin 08:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan motion to close
Before moving to close, I think it would be good for the project if you reviewed Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan/Proposed decision. There is considerable dissent that the decision to desysop MONGO and Seabhcan is the right direction to go. I'm not asking you to change your votes on that RfAr, but rather to consider that this matter is under ongoing, rapid fire discussion. There's been nearly a hundred edits to that talk page in the last 48 hours alone, and that is just one fora where this is being debated among many. Respectfully submitted, --Durin 20:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete old user page?
Hi, I was wondering if you could delete my old user page, User:Gbambino. I've opened up a new account for various reasons and would like to have the old one completely shut down. I'm only assuming you have the ability to do such a thing, but if you don't, I'd be appreciative if you could tell me who can. Cheers. --Gmbambino 22:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind, I've found the information I was looking for. --Gmbambino 22:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Amoruso shouldn't have been blocked for WP:3RR violations, as he was reverting edits by a banned user
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#This_block_is_wholly_unjustified_by_the_3RR.2C_and_appears_to_be_inconsistent_with_WP:BAN.23Enforcement_by_reverting_edits, where I have provided a compelling justification for unblocking Amoruso. John254 22:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)