→Please follow BRD: Reply Tag: Reply |
→Are you following me to article talk pages?: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:Do not revert edits without giving appropriate justification. That is disruptive editing and I treated it as such by editing on sight. –[[User:Dlthewave|dlthewave]] [[User_talk:Dlthewave|☎]] 04:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC) |
:Do not revert edits without giving appropriate justification. That is disruptive editing and I treated it as such by editing on sight. –[[User:Dlthewave|dlthewave]] [[User_talk:Dlthewave|☎]] 04:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
::I did give an appropriate justification. The original addition had no edit summary so how much justification would be acceptable in your view? [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 05:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC) |
::I did give an appropriate justification. The original addition had no edit summary so how much justification would be acceptable in your view? [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 05:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Are you following me to article talk pages? == |
|||
Dlthewave, given our history my impression is you are following me to various topics/articles with the intent to disagree or undermine things I say. You seem to come out of nowhere to disagree with me here [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Matt_Gaetz&diff=prev&oldid=1140753770] and now do something similar at an article that I don't believe you have had any previous involvement [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chloe_Cole&diff=prev&oldid=1142016192]. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I do get that sense. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 02:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:32, 28 February 2023
Discretionary Sanctions Awareness: |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present. |
Confederate monuments
I was hoping you'd comment on a matter at the Removal of Confederate monuments and memorials talk page.--MagicatthemovieS
Lookout, Wyoming
Hello Dlthewave, i answered you on the page's talk section. I'm at your disposal to clarify issues related to the matter.
Your sincerely,
Faqu, talk. 21 May 2020, 02:37
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Out of place artifact source removal
In this edit, you removed a source, calling it "questionable." Could you perhaps explain your reasoning for that evaluation? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for reaching out. It's being discussed on the article talk page, feel free to ask any questions there. –dlthewave ☎ 19:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- No need. I double-checked at RSN, and they confirmed what you had concluded; the source is garbage. Thanks for catching it. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
Please follow BRD
Dlthewave, you are an experienced editor. You know that when a contentious LABEL is added without justification then reverted the correct action is to start a talk page discussion, not revert. If you think the far-right label should be applied to the opening sentence of the Carlson BLP then make the case on the talk page. Springee (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Do not revert edits without giving appropriate justification. That is disruptive editing and I treated it as such by editing on sight. –dlthewave ☎ 04:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Are you following me to article talk pages?
Dlthewave, given our history my impression is you are following me to various topics/articles with the intent to disagree or undermine things I say. You seem to come out of nowhere to disagree with me here [1] and now do something similar at an article that I don't believe you have had any previous involvement [2]. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I do get that sense. Springee (talk) 02:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)