→Murat Han: r |
→Malcolm T Elliott: new section |
||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
The creator of [[Murat Han]] did keep on removing the BLP unsourced tag-you might want to give him another warning for that! [[User:Wgolf|Wgolf]] ([[User talk:Wgolf|talk]]) 23:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC) |
The creator of [[Murat Han]] did keep on removing the BLP unsourced tag-you might want to give him another warning for that! [[User:Wgolf|Wgolf]] ([[User talk:Wgolf|talk]]) 23:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Wgolf}} Based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Murat_Han&diff=721236260&oldid=721234597 this edit], the tag removal coincided with an attempt to add a ref, although that ref link didn't work properly (i.e. did not go to a page relating to Murat Han or the Bliss film). Given the attempt at referencing, a tag removal warning didn't seem accurate at this point. However, will msg the creator with an unref BLP welcome message for now. [[User:Dl2000|Dl2000]] ([[User talk:Dl2000#top|talk]]) 23:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Wgolf}} Based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Murat_Han&diff=721236260&oldid=721234597 this edit], the tag removal coincided with an attempt to add a ref, although that ref link didn't work properly (i.e. did not go to a page relating to Murat Han or the Bliss film). Given the attempt at referencing, a tag removal warning didn't seem accurate at this point. However, will msg the creator with an unref BLP welcome message for now. [[User:Dl2000|Dl2000]] ([[User talk:Dl2000#top|talk]]) 23:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Malcolm T Elliott == |
|||
Up untill the 18th May Malcolm T Elliott's page was CORRECT - written by me his sister, he approved all entries, he can be contacted at malcolmtelliott@gmail.com. |
|||
But if any clown can edit the page it is best removed entirey. Thank you Wendy Elliott |
Revision as of 21:40, 23 May 2016
- Archives
- Do not post or modify messages in the archives - use this current page instead.
- And do not repost messages that have been archived!
- --> Archive 1: February 2006-July 2007 (initial welcome, earliest msgs)
- --> Archive 2: July 2007-April 2009 (second welcome, more msgs)
- --> Archive 3: April 2009-August 2010
- --> Archive 4: August 2010-March 2011
- --> Archive 5: March 2011-October 2011
- --> Archive 6: October 2011-March 2012
- --> Archive 7: March 2012-October 2012
- --> Archive 8: October 2012-July 2013
- --> Archive 9: July 2013-June 2014
- --> Archive 10: June 2014-January 2015
- --> Archive 11: January 2015-August 2015
- --> Archive 12: August 2015-December 2015
---
White Croats
I rewrote the article White Croats with over 120 ref-notes. Previous had templates of Original research and Refimprove, for obvious reasons, but don't understand their return by you for current revision? Is there some issue I didn't notice? As for the infobox, it's just unnecessary as there's no info to put in it, and if was (and don't know which - previously only under language Lechitic, which is obvious OR), don't see how much it would improve the article.--Crovata (talk) 11:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Re:
Can you be specific and tell me what is the wrong with my edits? because my first edit i reverted the content which was removed by IP address [1], and the second i fixed the problems of references [2]. I think you made a mistake and you should restore my edits on Al-Nassr FC. Hazel (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, this is Hsiao-Hung Pai. The reason why I removed the picture was because I don't want to use any picture for the Wikipedia entry. Hope that is acceptable. Apologies for the inconvenience caused! Secret red (talk) 07:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
you reverted my edit?
How was that vandalism? Sorry I'm new to editing wikis, but it's a proven fact that cyclobenzaprine is significantly less effective at treating skeletal muscle pain than carisoprodol. I didn't say cyclobenzaprine wasn't safer, I said it was less effective, which is true.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.171.231.193 (talk • contribs)
- Wrong number - haven't edited Carisoprodol or Cyclobenzaprine, at least in recent times. @Jytdog reverted your edit because you did not provide a source for that "proven fact". Without such verifiability, anyone could declare "facts" such as Elvis Presley inventing the Nitrogen laser. Dl2000 (talk) 15:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Political party-Bjp Avinendra0055 (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Kota Hazrat Nizamuddin Jan Shatabdi Express
Hi there,
Could I have your opinion on Leo Frank's edit for Kota Hazrat Nizamuddin Jan Shatabdi Express. My opinion is that it removes a large amount of information that makes the page what it is.
Superfast1111 (talk) 11:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
My apologies.
Dear Dl2000,
I apologize for removing this template, thereby causing you some unnecessary work to re-instate it.
I think it was only in the 'W' list, which is why I removed it, for consistency. Again, I am sorry if I did something wrong.
Please let me know if it should also be inserted in all the other lists, and I'll propagate it across there too. Thank you.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 21:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Article Inykhnum
Hi there. I undid your revert on Inykhnum. The changes I did are part of an update project. Our portal is working on meeting a new and more reader friendly standard. As a member of this project I work especially on early dynastic nobles and officials. My changes are always patrolled by my co-authors, thus no vandalisms. Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 09:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Content for WMH
Hello,
Thank you for your message. I've requested a username change purely because I take your advise it could be misconstrued as COI - which it isn't. This article and any amendments are purely for factual purposes, not promotional. No monies or any other kind of promotion has taken place with the items cited. Perhaps a little too much citing has taken place; however that was purely to ensure that the content remained factual and not "fluffy" or "promotional" in anyway.
Please advise further with any further recommendations. I wish to follow all guidelines.
Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmhagency (talk • contribs) 16:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Disclaimer above CityFALCON article
Dear, Dl2000!
Above the article on CityFALCON (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CityFALCON) there is a window which state, that the article uses unreliable sources, but there are links on such sources as Forbes, Businessinsider etc. What shall I do to make sources more reliable? Thank you in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gevlare (talk • contribs) 08:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Disclaimer CityFALCON
DI2000 thank you for the reply and for the link! I have read wiki article on reliable sources. Now I suggest to delete any links that you consider not to be reliable. They are almost duplicate each other so any valuable information won't be lost. Thank you in advance! Preceding unsigned comment added by Gevlare (talk • contribs) 10:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
DMY/MDY
Greetings. I have a couple of queries about your edits to Daulis Prescott: 1. Could you point me to a list on WP where it says that Colombia uses DMY instead of MDY, or other such regional variations (as in what they use in the rest of South America, Africa, etc.); 2. What is a "timewarped ref"? At WP:CITESTYLE and WP:CITEVAR, it clearly states that any style may be used, so why change it to citeweb after I spent all that time overhauling the article? (i.e. [I]t is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor.) Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- That explains it—I thought "timewarped" meant a broken ref or something, rather than a numerical error. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Policy discussion in progress
There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Someone like You", a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 02:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
Hello,
Thank you very much for your notification about my edits to the "Stefan Reif" article.
I'm not clear, however, how my submission is a conflict of interest. Yes, I did write a book on this topic, and I did speak with and exchange several emails with Professor Reif for my book. But since then I've had very little interaction with him at all. I was really just trying to complete the record on his work. Is this a conflict of interest?
Thanks in advance for your response,
Rabbimarkglickman (talk) 22:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Rabbi Mark Glickman
Promotional Material
Hello,
You flagged my edits on Stefan Reif as "Promotional Material." In reality, I was just trying to complete the record on the work of this important scholar - I have had very little contact with him since I wrote my book about the Cairo Genizah. Is it possible for you to reconsider your decision?
Thanks in advance
Rabbimarkglickman (talk)Rabbi Mark Glickman —Preceding undated comment added 23:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 29 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Re:
That content falls under db-g5 which I can confirm in my steward's capacities, ciao! --Vituzzu (talk) 22:33, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Saw your revert and thanks. The article is the subject of a university course and well-meaning efforts by several students ("grumble, grumble, why'd they trash the infobox? sheesh!"). Their instructor posted a rather lengthy outline on the Talk page. The article's on my watchlist, but after one revert, I decided to grit my teeth and wait until the current term passes to go back and clean up the aftermath of the party. Not that I'm against cleaning up as it goes along, but I've decided for the sake of my own sanity to join Mr. Thoreau for the season. Just sayin', is all. Cheers! Geoff | Who, me? 17:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
hi about your message : April 2016
Information icon Hello. An edit that you recently made to Court of Arbitration for Sport seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dl2000 (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
_________________
i've a question
i want to translate Court of Arbitration for Sport to Persian(Farsi)
but i can't find how to add new language to a page
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.113.173.159 (talk • contribs)
Your recent message
Hi, thanks for your message. The edits to the article in question were made in line with edits made to the world passport article which were made by concensus. Consequently, these edits were necessary on the WSA article as well, in order to maintain cohesion between articles. As I'm sure this is just a good will mistake on your behalf, I've reverted your reversion. --Île flottante (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Response to your message
The edit of mine which you reverted was simply trying to restore the page to its original content. It has since 2014 been hijacked by an IP to create a fake biographical article which I have now nominated for deletion at AFD. Ytfc23 (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ytfc23: Fair enough, but next time you replace an article with a redirect to a completely unrelated subject, you need some sort of justification in the edit summary. It would also have helped to verify and tag the refs, raise the hoax concerns earlier, maybe with a talk page discussion. Dl2000 (talk) 22:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Visa requirements for Malaysian citizens
Hi. Do you know what means inuse-section? Why did you amend the article with this warning? --Norvikk (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't put in the inuse-section, but ideally it means it shouldn't be left unedited for about six hours. Dl2000 (talk) 20:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Nikki Laoye
I reverted your removal of copyvio content. http://dailymail.com.ng/biographyprofile-of-award-winning-gospel-artist-nikki-laoye/2/ is dated February 20, 2015 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikki_Laoye&oldid=642105133 is the state of the article 2015-01-12T03:47:17. The copy was already present in the Wikipedia article before the dailymail.com.ng article was written. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Murat Han
The creator of Murat Han did keep on removing the BLP unsourced tag-you might want to give him another warning for that! Wgolf (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Wgolf: Based on this edit, the tag removal coincided with an attempt to add a ref, although that ref link didn't work properly (i.e. did not go to a page relating to Murat Han or the Bliss film). Given the attempt at referencing, a tag removal warning didn't seem accurate at this point. However, will msg the creator with an unref BLP welcome message for now. Dl2000 (talk) 23:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Malcolm T Elliott
Up untill the 18th May Malcolm T Elliott's page was CORRECT - written by me his sister, he approved all entries, he can be contacted at malcolmtelliott@gmail.com.
But if any clown can edit the page it is best removed entirey. Thank you Wendy Elliott