Line 1,732: | Line 1,732: | ||
If a page contains material which infringes copyright, that material – and the whole page, if there is no other material present – should be removed. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations for more information, and Wikipedia:Copyright problems for detailed instructions...Images, photographs, video and sound files, like written works, are subject to copyright. Someone holds the copyright unless they have explicitly been placed in the public domain. Images, video and sound files on the internet need to be licensed directly from the copyright holder or someone able to license on their behalf. In some cases, fair use guidelines may allow them to be used irrespective of any copyright claims; see Wikipedia:Non-free content for more. |
If a page contains material which infringes copyright, that material – and the whole page, if there is no other material present – should be removed. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations for more information, and Wikipedia:Copyright problems for detailed instructions...Images, photographs, video and sound files, like written works, are subject to copyright. Someone holds the copyright unless they have explicitly been placed in the public domain. Images, video and sound files on the internet need to be licensed directly from the copyright holder or someone able to license on their behalf. In some cases, fair use guidelines may allow them to be used irrespective of any copyright claims; see Wikipedia:Non-free content for more. |
||
Image description pages must be tagged with a special tag to indicate the legal status of the images, as described at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Untagged or incorrectly-tagged images will be deleted."}}''<!-- Template:uw-copyright --> '''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|-- ψλ]]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
Image description pages must be tagged with a special tag to indicate the legal status of the images, as described at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Untagged or incorrectly-tagged images will be deleted."}}''<!-- Template:uw-copyright --> '''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|-- ψλ]]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
:I hereby acknowledge receipt of the warning, but outright refuse to do anything in blatant defiance thereof. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- [[User:Director|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]] <span style="color:#464646">([[User talk:Director|<span style="color:#464646">talk</span>]])</span></font> 21:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
:I hereby acknowledge receipt of the warning, but outright refuse to do anything, in blatant defiance thereof. <font face="Eras Bold ITC">-- [[User:Director|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]] <span style="color:#464646">([[User talk:Director|<span style="color:#464646">talk</span>]])</span></font> 21:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:11, 3 December 2017
Sign (~~~~) before you save.
Roman EmpireI beg for your pardon but I see no 'consenus formed with input from quite a lot of users' as the talk page has only got a few articles and none of them are promptly responded. If you do not provide evidences, your 'very good reason' will only be a boastful self-proclamation. If my article in the talk page is still unresponded in this week, I will see that my opinion is not well-respected and will do the edit all over again. Thank you for your notice. Yours sincerely, Pktlaurence (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC) New Page Patrol survey
RfC started on WikiProject YugoslaviaSince you have taken part in substantial discussion on this matter, I am informing you that an RfC has been opened on WP Yugoslavia [1] RE:RenamingHello, Director. You have new messages at Talk:Draža Mihailović.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Merry ChristmasApril 2014There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Smeat75 (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC) which Parteiadler? discussionsee http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Nazism_sidebar#which_Parteiadler.3F and join the discussion 115.187.78.250 (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Disagreement on posterI realize we have a legitimate disagreement of opinion here, and I'd like to resolve it in a reasonable way. Rather than spreading it out to a million pages, Talk:Leon Trotsky seems like the best place to discuss this, and get third opinions, so it's not just you and me.--Pharos (talk) 05:11, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 8Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diocletian's Palace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jews_and_Communism_(2nd_nomination)You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jews_and_Communism_(2nd_nomination). Thanks. MarkBernstein (talk) 21:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Template:Z48 What really happenedDirector, I'm very happy that you have finally come to the realization that we were all "spending months in discussion on absolutely nothing." That's exactly how I feel. What really happened, whether you realize it or not, is that you blindly supported Producer (I have no idea why) and when the tide of support turned against him, you all of a sudden felt the need to change sides. Why do you "honestly feel nauseous" after reading a comparison? Why does it matter that the article was copied from an antisemitic site? Why does it matter where it came from? Any reasonable person should be able to look at information and decide for themselves whether the information is worthwhile, or propaganda, or whatever. I wonder if it may have something to do with being on the opposite side of the world (from me) and how propaganda is presented to you in your country compared to how propaganda is presented in my country. In any case, I'm really happy that you're able to see things differently, even though I don't understand your reasoning for changing your mind. I hope you know that I was giving you a hard time simply because it was so much fun, and also because you were sooooooo wrong! :-) I like you much better now that you agree with me. lol USchick (talk) 18:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank youI said thanks on my talk page but I want to make sure that you see a message from me saying thank you for my barnstar! It is very gracious of you and I am really touched.Smeat75 (talk) 23:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. USchick (talk) 17:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Possible Meat/Sock Puppetry InvestigationWe're discussing possibly opening another investigation of you for meat and/or sockpuppetry here. --Atlantictire (talk) 01:11, 14 May 2014 (UTC) SupportHi Director, Each day we discover new examples of dysfunction of the "internet community" system. Group behaviour is something fascinating but that should frighten all of us. Don't forget that the accusations that target you are just the results of such social mechanisms that lead to the lynching of the black sheep. Despite the basic and clever rules that were written to manage wikipedia, writing an encyclopaedia in such a context is more than a challenge. Good continuation. For your own wellness, but for no other reason, I advise you to self-ban from this article and topic. Pluto2012 (talk) 04:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
I do NOT "scheme"USchick (talk) 23:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, I am a riot at parties.. :) As regards the thread, well, I guess even when I make such a big mistake I draw the line at tolerating such poor diagnoses. And why would I mention you? I don't believe in quid pro quo ;). -- Director (talk) 02:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments from TParisI've closed the AN thread that sought a topic ban against you as no consensus. I was going to leave it at that, but upon further reflecting, I think this warrants a little more than thread summary. I've run across you quite a few times on ANI and AN. I can't recall all of the times, but I know at various points I've supported and opposed some of the things that you've done in those threads. I also understand that you've taken a lot of heat in the last couple of days after you accepted that the article in question was sourced to a antisemitic article. So take this with however many grains of salt you choose to. However, I think what got you into this situation has been the same issues that has often led you to being at ANI. My impression of you has always been 'good editor, bad collaborator.' You seem to be right about 90% of the time I see you in these messes, and I think you're probably quite educated and informed. But I think this needs to be a beacon for you that other editors can be just as educated and informed. A little more patience and understanding of other editors is needed and would've helped you here. There were several editors saying that there fish stank and that more investigation was needed. Anyway, I'm just a kid from the US, not trying to be patronizing, so take whatever you find useful.--v/r - TP 21:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I hope you and Producer are safe and not affected by the floods. USchick (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC) Yah, just noticed this massive body of water already covering much of the landscape! Luckily I have located an ingenious device that may allow me to traverse it on my way to safety.. :) -- Director (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes FkpCascais, deciding where to locate your household is definitely something to consider once you have lived through a catastrophe. I live in the Southeastern United States. During Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita people were being evacuated in helicopters and some of those people ended up in my region, far away from the disaster area. Somehow I ended up being in charge of communications for our entire region. Thankfully, I was prepared, because my organization had just finished disaster preparedness planning. At that time, there was a national mandate that required everyone to coordinate efforts and plan for natural disasters, but anyone with a brain understood that the real reason was a terrorist threat like another September 11 attack. It's a long story about how I ended up in charge, but I did. Since I was directly involved with the planning teams, I was probably more qualified than upper management to deal with the crisis. After each event, I was officially recognized by the government. The coordinated planning effort proved to be so useful, that people keep it in place and keep updating it. It's been used for all kinds of things since then. For all our faults, one thing we do very well in the US, is self organize. We also have a lot of local disasters, but everyone in the South is extremely self sufficient, so some stories barely make the news. Anytime there's a disaster, you never hear other countries sending aid, people are so used to taking care of problems, it has to be something really serious before anyone from the outside takes notice. I would never live in a large metropolitan area with skyscrapers and subway systems. That's a terrible place to be stuck, with no way out and crazy people everywhere. USchick (talk) 04:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Re:Hello, Director. You have new messages at IvanOS's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. HiHello, Director! I assume you'll be interested to take a look at edits recently made at Prime Minister of Yugoslavia, when you have enough time to do that. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Coat of arms of Croatia properI have a question about the coat of arms of Croatia proper. At our page, Coat of arms of Croatia, it says that the coat of arms of Croatia proper, as represented in the coat of arms of the Republic of Croatia, is the image linked on the right. However, at Croatia proper, you've put the chessboard in. I don't know enough about the subject, but I figure that either the Croatia proper article or the Coat of arms of Croatia article is wrong, or perhaps I'm missing something. RGloucester — ☎ 19:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Personal attacks on my behalfI kindly ask of you to that you do not call me a sock puppet. There has been no reason to do so, especially on the talk page. Asdisis (talk) 19:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Belligerents order in World War 2There is a discussion about belligerents order for WWII in the talk page [2] which challenge previous consensus. Current change for WWII article is ranking USA above United Kingdom, ranking France above China and adding the leaders of Romania and Hungary into Info box. I thought you should know, as you seem to join the previous discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.38.217 (talk) 00:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Re: Well..Please, don't go into a grand conspiracy mode... I've had enough of that this week on another front (pun intended). Nobody actually removed anything about the NOB from Wikipedia. Heck, I'd be much happier if we actually had people write more about it in such a summary article, whatever its name, because this one remains an article about WWII in Yugoslavia that hardly even touches on the context of the major elements of the war such as the persecution campaigns, concentration camps, the stories of the People's Heroes, the strategic bombings... --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Andrewjacksonclipper.jpg listed for deletionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andrewjacksonclipper.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
DalmatiaThe third paragraph at Dalmatia/Definition is a 65-word sentence. Would you please look at it if you have time. No response is necessary. Thank you very much. Respectfully, Tiyang (talk) 10:37, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 5Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonio Tacconi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. WikiProject Military history coordinator electionGreetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC) Seven reverts is edit warringI don't have time to fuck with you right now, but you really need to have stopped and hour ago. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 22:35, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussionHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.-TFD (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC) IQ and Global Inequality: a suggestionA few months ago, when TheRedPenOfDoom removed a similar map from Race Differences in Intelligence (book) along with several paragraphs from the book's summary, I opened a request for comment about the removals. Two uninvolved editors, Markbasset and Solarra, commented in favour of including the removed content before the RFC was shut down. If you care about restoring the map on the IQ and Global Inequality article, I suggest starting an RFC like I did. You may find that, as was the case on the other article, editors without a vested long-term involvement in these articles tend to share your perspective. 36.250.89.95 (talk) 22:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou! The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. AN/IThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Alex discussion ★ 21:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC) Complaint about you at WP:AN3Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Director reported by User:Aleksa Lukic (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC) Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC) This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience. Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81 MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Global accountHi Director! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Reichskommissariat is a Commissariat, not a countryThis was already discussed at Talk:Reichskommissariat_of_Belgium_and_Northern_France and the consensus was that a Reichskommissariat is a Commissariat and thus inbox government agency is the most appropriate. --Nug (talk) 09:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. User nameWhen you changed your user name, your user name was changed from DIREKTOR to Director on en.wiki only. No unified global account was created, probably because unattached accounts (some of which which have edited) exist on over 40 wikis. See https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ACentralAuth&target=Director. Your account on the Commons under is DIREKTOR, and Commons is the home wiki for that account. A global unified account exists for this username. https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ACentralAuth&target=DIREKTOR. Therefore, every time you visit a wiki with this username, an account is automatically created with that username, and if you edit while logged in under this name, edits are credited to DIREKTOR. Perhaps the unused user account "Director" on Commons can be linked to your account here; I don't know. You will have to ask a bureaucrat. If it's not possible to link them, you will have to remember to log out when you leave the Commons and log in with your new user name when you arrive here. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2015 (UTC) I just noticed the message above where a steward is recommending creating a unified login, so it might still be possible to do this yourself, if the "Director" account on the Commons was created by you and has the same password. See meta:Help:Unified login#How to unify your accounts. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
GamerGate Discretionary sanctions noticePlease carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Head of stateI'm gonna let others weigh in at that article. PS: Whatever you do, don't bring England, Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland into it ;) GoodDay (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC) Missing mayors 20 through 23This edit [3] at Mayor of Split seems to have removed no.20 through 23. I don't understand the table formatting well enough to fix it and I don't want to revert this edit because it fixed some content. Perhaps in your copious free time you can see what went wrong here and fix it? --Wtshymanski (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
TimbouctouWhat do you think about Timbouctou making unnecessary changes on article about Ivo Josipović. He keeps adding years next to Prime Ministers despite the fact that I have proven to him this is unnecessary, no President of a EU member state has years next to Prime Ministers who have served in time of their mandate. Why is he doing this? This is not the first time he has done such violations. He ignores the Talk page. Does he need to be sanctioned? Tnx --Tuvixer (talk) 22:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Germany - historical mapsHi. First off, I would like to congratulate you the high quality on your map of the Third Reich during 1942. I was just wondering if you were going to be making similar maps for the Holy Roman Empire (as the current map shows the expanse of the nation in Europe, but overlain on modern borders), and the North German Confederation (for aesthetic purposes so that the maps in the German articles can "match"). I'm asking you as I do not have the programming or technological knowledge to make one myself. Nick Mitchell 98 (talk)
How to?Hi. Can you help me in something. Again Tombouctou is trolling, I have provided the sources. But he wont stop terrorizing me. I would like to change on the article about Ivo Josipović from jurist to law professor. If he reverts my edits, can i warn him. I have never experiences such harassment from another user on Wikipedia so I don't know how that works, I mean the warning system. Do I copy paste the templates from this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#Warnings , or something else? Tnx. I hope I am not disturbing you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuvixer (talk • contribs) 17:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. List of Presidents of Croatia ANI discussionThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC) nazi germany mapthe original map is also more usefull it shows how europe was under german domination why do we have to replace with a low quality version? the new map is incorrect and you opossed it Dannis243 (talk) 16:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Disputed text on Istrian ExodusHello, I understand you consider the following text POV: The first city to see a massive departure of ethnic Italians was Zadar. Between November 1943 and Zadar was bombed by the Allies, with serious civilian casualties (fatalities recorded range from under 1,000 to as many ad 4,000 of over 20,000 city's inhabitants). Many died in the carpet bombings, and many landmarks and centuries old works of art were destroyed. A significant number of civilians fled the city. In late October 1944 the German army and most of the Italian civilian administration abandoned the city.[1] On October 31, 1944, the Partisans seized the city, until then a part of Mussolini's Italian Social Republic. At the start of World War II, Zadar had a population of 24,000 and, by the end of 1944, this had decreased to 6,000.[1] Formally, the city remained under Italian sovereignty until September 15, 1947[2] (Paris Peace Treaties) but by that date the exodus from the city had been already almost total. Please do not hesitate to join the Talk page. Silvio1973 (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC) References
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Dispute Resolution of Istrian ExodusI am the third volunteer at the dispute resolution noticeboard who will ask you to limit your comments on Istrian exodus until a volunteer agrees to mediate the content issues. User:Doniago advised you and other editors on 27 March not to continue your back-and-forth until someone takes the case, and said that continuing to complain about conduct would likely result in no one taking the case. On 29 March, User:Keithbob said: "Stop the bickering and wait for a moderator or this case will be closed and sent back to the talk page." Threaded discussion is generally not permitted at DRN, and discussion of issues is generally not permitted while a case is waiting for a moderator. You then said to User:Keithbob: 'I don't appreciate being talked to like this. Simply because Silvio1973 keeps trying to "reply" to everything I write doesn't mean I'm "bickering" with anybody (that kind of disruption is "how he rolls"). I was asked a question. I replied to that question. If I discussed Silvio1973's conduct its because its relevant to my reply.' First, no, your comments on editor conduct are not relevant at DRN. DRN discusses content, not contributors. Conduct issues are dealt with elsewhere, and are not allowed to get in the way of content resolution at DRN. Second, it is not useful, if you do want the content dispute resolved here, to rebuke a volunteer mediator, who was only trying to explain how we work here. I don't know anything about the content dispute. I do see that you need to be more patient if you want the content dispute resolved amicably, and patience includes avoiding premature threaded discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:48, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Oh what nonsense... Firstly the DRN request was ridiculous from the start: Silvio1973 doesn't know what DRN is for (he thinks its this), and his "summary" is a deliberate provocation. I do know what DRN is for, but since I wasn't about to discuss while Silvio1973 is edit-warring - I naturally had to state that position. Then I was asked outright whether or not I'd discuss the issue with Silvio1973, and I again explained my position. This is "bickering"? Look, I've been around Wiki for maybe eight years now; with over 55,000 edits, I know full well how DRN functions. Its Keithbob who didn't really appear to read or get the point of my comments on Silvio1973, which were: "I won't be bullied, I won't talk to this guy". I'm really getting too old to just take that kind of patronizing nonsense from random users. I wrote a total of what? Three posts? -- Director (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2015 (UTC) Discretionary sanctionsThis message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
GermanyThank you so much for the polite and civilized debate over NSDAP, Nazi etc. I really do appreciate when it's editors who can talk to each other! Cheers DBaK (talk) 10:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Cabinet of Zoran MilanovićHi. Can you put your opinion regarding the "Budget 2015" column in the table listing the ministers. There is a discussion on the talk page. Cabinet I think it is a good addition to the table to list the current budget for every Ministry. But an other used has been overzealous to stop this addition. Tnx in advance. --Tuvixer (talk) 09:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. MinistriesHi, can you join the debate on Talk:Ministry of Culture (Croatia). I think it is a good addition to the infobox to place next to the amount of budget increase/decrease arrow that shows the changes compared to the last year budget. Also only one user thinks that the HRK should be before the amount and not after. What is your thinking on that. It is for all ministers, and you can see in the history of all ministries of Croatian Government that timbouctou has started a edit-war just to harassed me again, I don't know why. I have put a great effort on finding the information and I can't think of a reason not to put the information in the infobox. I understand that he wants to put the HRK currency in front of the amount because it makes the amount less visible or maybe he thinks that people will think that it is in dollars and that would be a disaster because we now have a "red" government. I mean he is crazy, you understand? I hope I was clear enough. You can imagine how I felt when I saw that he reverted all my edits. And did not even try to discuss. Tnx in advance. :) --Tuvixer (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC) list of presidentsHi, tombouctou has again vandalizes the article about the list of presidents. Can you handle him, i can no longer stand him and i will go offline now. --Tuvixer (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Ema Derossi-Bjelajac.jpgThank you for uploading File:Ema Derossi-Bjelajac.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC) nazi germanysee https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nazi_Germany#map_4 Dannis243 (talk) 11:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC) but its diffrent this time and i explained the diffrence Dannis243 (talk) 15:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Croatian languageCould you please enlighten me - is there another official language in Croatia besides Croatian? Our article about Croatia lists Croatian as the only official language. Our article about Croatian language states that it is the official language of Croatia. Why should then our article about Croats state that Croatian is an official language of Croatia? Surtsicna (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
ANIThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Potočnik (talk) 11:31, 17 June 2015 (UTC) I'm afraid you;re showing your ignorance on this topicKershaw is the author of the recent 2-volume definitive biography of Hitler, Fest is the author of the first major biography, and Burleigh is the author of the recent The Third Reich: A New History. These are not WP:FRINGE writers, they are major players in this area, and they all agree that there was no coherent political philosophy behind "National Socialism", that it tried to be all things to all people in order to attract voters, and after the "seizure of power", all it really stood for was whatever Hitler demanded. Early on it tried to combine radical nationalism with socialism, but about the only thing it really stood for was getting into power, at first by putsch and then by electoral politics. Its most consistent aspects were nationalism, anti-Bolshevism and antisemitism, but even the latter was significantly under-emphasized during the electoral politics period. There really is no ideology called "National Socialism". BMK (talk) 22:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Ban appealHi, I appealed my topic ban (diff). Taking in consideration that we were involved in disputes in past I would like to inform you that I appealed my ban so you could again present your opinion. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:BanrevertTemplate:Banrevert has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:04, 13 August 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Proposed deletion of SiderophageThe article Siderophage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. WikiProject Military history coordinator electionGreetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC) Battle of France ResultHello! I would invite you to join me, yet again, to the Battle of France talk page. Keith-264 has yet again decided to emberass himself, and I need your help. He says that he will undo the page and infobox once again, despite the facts that we have presented. Join us at talk. Thanks. KevinNinja (talk) 00:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC) SemiprotectionHi, Director, just a heads up: I've semiprotected your user page for 24 hours. If you want it unprotected, please feel free to ask me (or any other admin) and we'll do so. Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Use of your old account.You are using your old account with no clear link to the new one for example in talk pages. You should at least show it in your signature. Cheers, --77.105.28.219 (talk) 16:56, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Nazism sidebar debateHi Director. In order to avoid any further improper use of a superseded RfC (the one that selected the Parteiadler as the infobox image), might I suggest archiving posts on the talk page earlier than 2015? Whether this is done now or after the current issue has been resolved is up to you, this is just a suggestion from me. Nick Mitchell 98 (talk) 10:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Serbs of CroatiaHello. Can I ask how come you are not participating on Serbs of Croatia to apply the consensus of the RfC. You extensively participated in the RfC and when it was closed you kinda left. Don't you agree with the consensus? 94.253.23.60 (talk) 21:56, 15 October 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Early Himmler SS photoDirector: being a frequent editor of Nazi Germany/SS related articles, and the last person to upload a version (correcting the tone) of this photo, you may have an interest in commenting on it herein: Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2015_October_17#File:HimmlerOberfhr.jpg. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC) POV pushing[7], he's been doing that for ages. Well a few months on Serbs of Croatia, and for walls of text on Yugoslavia. I think I would find more if I went trough his contributions. 91.236.250.250 (talk) 00:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Maybe this would interest you. It seems others have problems with him as well. 93.171.64.118 (talk) 01:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Us again...Now that the show is over and the spotlights are off, we really need to have a chat. What happed there, why were saying those things over there? Why you use the discrediting tricks? Saying I am a Croatian Serbs refugee, why? So people would think I am acting in rage? Come on, we talked long time ago, I dont know if you remember, I told you who am I. I am from Belgrade. Born in Belgrade, have an apartment in Belgrade, family in Belgrade, and Belgrade was the only place I ever lived there. My father is from Belgrade and his family are a traditional Belgrade family, and the only remarc from my paternal side is that my grand-grand-father was an engeneer from Prague who was in the team of Austro-Hungarian specialists projecting the railroad construction between Belgrade and Istambul. He got inloved for a Serbian woman in Belgrade, my grand-grand-mother, and married and lived mostly in Belgrade since then (sowe have a little Czech blood there). My mother is from Belgrade and her parents are Serbs from Sarajevo that came to Belgrade to study still before the WWII. I lived abroad since young age because my mother worked in SIP and was a diplomat (now retired). So no, I have nothing to do with Serbs from Croatia, and much less with refugees. First time I moved abroad was to a country where my mother was sent to another diplomatic mission (SFR Yugoslavia embassy) still in the time when no one even dreamed what was going to happend in the 1990s. I was a proud Yugoslav back then, and for long afterwords. The only thing that associate me to Croatia was, I told you I believe, a summer house we had near Dubrovnik. It was preciselly there, in my summer hollidays in 1990, that I perceved for the first time what was being cooked. Our car with Belgrade-registered plates got to be a target of vandalization, and so was our house in the following years, which my parents ended up selling. In Belgrade you were feeling a change too; the gray aparatchiks talking about the nasty foreign-payed secesionists wanting to destroy our wanderfull country. However, I dont know if you ever been to Belgrade, but there, more notoriously back then, you get totally influenced by the metropolitan urban speach, which is absolutely opposed to the populist politicians one. You were mentioning there at the discussions Milošević, Šešelj, the Radicals, etc. bolding them, sugesting I am following their theories or associating me with them... They were mocked and ridiculised in all my circles, loved just as in Zagreb or Split, and you guys probably payed them more atention than we did. Only old people and rednecks followed them. You dont get information and influence by the media, but you get them from your social circles. However, and returning to my point, you dont get right or wrong necessarily that way. Because Serbs had awfull polticians you cant conclude Serbs are some crazy lunatics and were always wrong and had no points whatsoever. If one thing I learned is that there are no good&bad guys and the situations in the 1990s, it is not black and white, but rather shades of gray. Anyone using the good vs bad guys formula is subjective. So again you used a strategy I saw you doing many times before, which is working on discrediting the editor opposing you by associating him with the extremists from his side. In the personal remarcs part of your comments you made so much wrong claims that I would have needed long posts (such as this one) just to explain it all. You may have noteced I ignored those parts totally. As soon as I was seing nationalists/Milosevic etc. words in your comments, you may not believe me, but those paragraphs of yours I wasnt even reading them. And I was not willing neither having patience to have those debates with you, and I was really hoping whoever comes from outside they would just pay atention to the sources and the concrete ponts that mattered. But I was wrong, your discrediting strategy worked the trick. I ended up being seen as someone wanting to take your territory, an invasor, and that was not it. I dont plan at all coming anything near this issues, maybe forever. I have so many areas here of my interest I want to work on. However some points need to be cleared out between you and me. First one, how I got involved? I will tell you the secret of how I get involved in differrent issues. I rutinely observe my watchlist, which after near a decade is quite vast and includes diverse topics. I involve where I see the usual POV-pushers making their work. You possibly remember how it started there. I saw the huge gap between one side and the other so there was an invitation for my involvement. Second thing; I didnt had any specific intention. I went to see sources and I made propoals by seing what they were saying. Third, Important! I never said Serbs had the right to secede from Croatia, something b the end you argued a lot. I found one source saying constitutive nations had the right to sucede (also that same, or maybe another one, talked that Serbs were added as such along Croats in what was SFRY solution for the Serbian question. An issue worth exploring for personal knolledge and you know what it refers), I just put that on the table to discuss, and you criticized that view and you made a funny exemple of a Serb-owned flat in Zagreb. I just mentioned the municipalities as a more logical exemple than your exageration about the flat. But I didnt said I supported that, or that the source was saying that about municipalities, nothing of that. You missused my exemple to mock me, and you got it. And fourth, OK, this is getting way longer than I wanted, so I will conclude; I respect you because we are ammong the oldest active editors in our area and we already had numerous battles and adventures together here, but I would respect you way more if you didnt made use of personal remarcs and those tricks trying to discredit the opponent in other editors eyes so you would get points. You and I know what is it about, and I know you know when you apologised. Cause this is a wanderfull project which often criates content by challenging the opposite views. And I like good challenges. I am someone perfectly able to get along with someone having a totally opposite opinion than me. So you apologised to me and I accept your apologies, and I apologise to you for saying the bullshit comment. I will just ask you, please, if we ever discuss in oposiite side in future to totally refrain from tricks such as labeling the opponent and commenting on each other. Not that I have something to loose, I am not affraid of your labels, I could deal and prove them wrong perfectly, but because degrades us both and creates a contaminated enviromnent. Peace. Pozdrav. FkpCascais (talk) 05:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Oh god... am I supposed to read all this? Will reply when I get the time.. Asdisis, if you have something to say to Fkp, take it to his talkpage. -- Director (talk) 01:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the long post, but I had to post this [13]. Just look at this sentence:"Svedok Štrbac – koji je bio predsednik komisije za razmenu zarobljenih i mrtvih, kao i sekretar Vlade Republike Srpske Krajine – opširno je opisao izbijanje rata u Hrvatskoj, sugerišući da je zato bila kriva vlast Hrvatske demokratske zajednica koja je Srbe diskriminisala, otpuštala i uklonila ih iz ustava kao konstitutivni narod.". This is exactly as I put it. People who were responsible for the war are trying to justify it. So it's not surprising Serbs are repeating those exact claims. On the other side it's not surprising that many Croatians do not have positive view on Tudjman since it's not hard to find criticism towards him in Croatia. 89.164.165.230 (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Dubrovnik nobility2Template:Dubrovnik nobility2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zoupan 22:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Dubrovnik nobility sidebarTemplate:Dubrovnik nobility sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zoupan 22:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Undisputable titles of some Ragusan familiesFor now, I am sure you have no basis for claiming that the moves to Binciola, Caboga and Zamagna are controversial. In good faith, I am waiting for your answer on these examples.--Zoupan 14:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buća, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Tryphon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Hi, Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC) Abu Bakr al-BaghdadiWhy is there no need for dob to be in lead sentence? That it default MoS isn't it? Omnipedia (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Social Democratic Party of Croatia.pngNote that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. My condolencesI am sure you must be delighted about the recent assignment of Zlatko Hasanbegovic... Silvio1973 (talk) 09:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Serbs of Croatia articleSorry for bothering you again with this, but since the recent posts in that topic are directed towards you I would like to note some things here so I don't start the pointless discussions on the topic. The new editor had made a post on 10 January. I answered on 11th by saying "The matter is closed by a RfC.". Then in another post I said "This discussion has yielded a conclusion that had entered the article." Then on 12th I said "You can read the conclusion in the RfC closure and the review". The new user then wen't on claiming this on the 25th: "The IP user disagrees: they claim the RfC and the subsequent discussions haven't reached any conclusion...". I think the best thing is to ignore that kind of behavior. 89.164.194.137 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Battle of France under review!The Battle of France article is now being reviewed for good article status. I require your help, if possible, to get this review to pass. Much help would be HIGHLY appreciated! Since you worked a lot on the article, I think you could really contribute to the pass. KevinNinja (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. House of Zamanjić (Džamanjić) listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect House of Zamanjić (Džamanjić). Since you had some involvement with the House of Zamanjić (Džamanjić) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 20:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Answer[14] , you know that doesn't go along with Serbian nationalistic view? Those pov pushers don't care whether they go against their own previous view, as long as they insert Serbian pov. You can make an alternative suggestion, but here's a preview of what it will look [15]. Interesting enough, when it comes to insert ethnicity to the lead in pro-Serbian point of view, then it's not "so irrelevant" for them - Nikola_Tesla141.136.205.239 (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC) Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participateHi Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal. We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal. You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason. DiptanshuTalk 05:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine. The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Help in calming nerves with the Battle of France, againHey! Please visit the talk page for the Battle of France. Again, a discussion has been created about the infobox, and I need you to back me up. Thanks!! KevinNinja (talk) 02:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator electionGreetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Abusive edits and threatsUser:Director: I have mentioned you by name [[16]] here. Keith-264 (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Battle of France (last time?)Please comment on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_France#RFC:_Scope_of_.22result.22_included_in_the_infobox Thanks. KevinNinja (talk) 23:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Director. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) QuestionI would just like to ask you something. --Silverije (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. re:COAWhy, prey tell, didn't you simply upload the COA with one border as a separate file instead of uploading it over a COA with two borders? And then you upload the same COA with two borders as a separate file. It's a waste of time. Also, please keep Christmas and other celebrations of superstition for yourself.--Calapone (talk) 10:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC) This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject. The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Requested move: Split, Croatia to Split (city)Hi! Seeing as you're one of the most active contributors to the article, I thought you'd like to share your thoughts on the matter. You can find the move discussion here. Thank you! (Also, you should probably consider archiving some of your talk page.) ~barakokula31 (talk) 12:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. March Madness 2017G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement. The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also. The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now. For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Balkans calling Split, EUHey, whazzup? How is life now in EU? You dont need to forget your old palls. My wife hated you so much those past years when she spent the nights alone while we fought each and every word in the neverending discussions here. Are you still in Split? I am still in Cascais. Time starts running so fast one doesnt even notece it. I thought of moving to Belgrade with my wife but I am still postponing it. As much as Serbia still has a harsh reputation of low living standard within Europe, looking just to Belgrade actually is not at all behind compared to Lisbon in many paramethers. The thing that actually warries is that your favourite comedian Šešelj is bloody serious about taking power and if that happends, a scenario quite plausible, the uncertenty about the future will be huge. I always considered you intelligent. So it is not necessary for you to comment to me about the reasons why was Šešelj allowed to return to Serbia and even engage in politics. When wanting to finish with an already beaten and unstable enemy, you don't need to further get your hands dirty, no, all you need is just give him a gun and they will kill themselves. Šešelj is the perfect gun for the job. So allow me to go back. I was in 1990 in Belgrade, Sarajevo, Mostar, Dobrovnik and Korčula. Since I had already lived in the West I was quite used to election campaigns. Everything was quite iqual, posters, flags, stickers, borring politician faces, slogans of promisses of wanderfull futures that never happen, etc. but this one was clearly different in one important aspect. My country was Yugoslavia, but the parties were all campagning for their respetive republic. In all previous countries I had the chance to see the election campaigns, parties were focused on national problems and had platforms and agendas directed to the entire nation. How could such democratization process lede to anything beside separation? FkpCascais (talk) 02:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
YugoslaviaAlthough I like to thank you for rolling back the Yugoslavia article since it is the overview article, do we consider the main Yugoslavia (Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) as the default article? Supreme Dragon (talk) 21:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. AN/IThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legal threat by Director. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC) A bit of advice...You may want to look into {{fbdb}} which produces ([FBDB]) or maybe setting up a link like this. For the record, I thought it was pretty obviously a joke, too. I wouldn't have thought so if it came from a brand new editor, though. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 02:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Nomination for deletion of Template:ExamsDIRlongTemplate:ExamsDIRlong has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. "Full Titles in Infobox"A while back you reversed my edit to Adolf Hitler's main page listing him as "Fuhrer of the German Realm and People". You mentioned that your reason for doing so was because "full titles were not used for this entry". Does this apply to all biography articles or just the one for Hitler? Thanks!Emiya1980 (talk) 23:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator electionGreetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Kingdom of YugoslaviaYour edit was reverted by another user back to a state flag. Just thought you should know. 108.30.128.7 (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Take this into considerationIf you bludgeon commenters and !voters at this RfC as you did at the last one (as well as the image deletion discussion), you will be reported at AN this time around. Just so you know. Please reconsider any plans or compulsion you might have for engaging in such. Thanks. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 16:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Director. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) December 2017 Your addition to Talk:Benito Mussolini needs to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. |