ScrupulousScribe (talk | contribs) |
PaleoNeonate (talk | contribs) →February 2021: new section |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Dingle, I read [[User:Heimstern/Wikipedia_is_going_to_suck_sometimes|this essay yesterday]] and [[Wikipedia:Advice_for_hotheads#You_cannot_argue_Wikipedia_into_capitulation|this essay earlier today]], and I would suggest that you read them too and close the ANI. I created this account on the urge to right something that I felt was wrong, and while it hasn't been hugely successful in the way I went about it, I believe I have achieved my overall objective, and I trust that other editors who understand the science, as well as WP Policy, will pick up where we left off. While they often act obtuse, our contrarian friends are slowly coming around to realizing that the lab leak theory wasn't quite what they first thought it was, and if you listen in on their conversations ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Wuhan_Lab_Leak_again here]), you can see some cogs starting to turn in their heads (they're past the second stage of realizing that the leak doesn't mean "Bioweapon + Trump + bleh", but they are still a bit before the final stage of understanding the risks posed by certain gain of function studies). Let's meet up again at the [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)|Village Pump]]. |
Dingle, I read [[User:Heimstern/Wikipedia_is_going_to_suck_sometimes|this essay yesterday]] and [[Wikipedia:Advice_for_hotheads#You_cannot_argue_Wikipedia_into_capitulation|this essay earlier today]], and I would suggest that you read them too and close the ANI. I created this account on the urge to right something that I felt was wrong, and while it hasn't been hugely successful in the way I went about it, I believe I have achieved my overall objective, and I trust that other editors who understand the science, as well as WP Policy, will pick up where we left off. While they often act obtuse, our contrarian friends are slowly coming around to realizing that the lab leak theory wasn't quite what they first thought it was, and if you listen in on their conversations ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Wuhan_Lab_Leak_again here]), you can see some cogs starting to turn in their heads (they're past the second stage of realizing that the leak doesn't mean "Bioweapon + Trump + bleh", but they are still a bit before the final stage of understanding the risks posed by certain gain of function studies). Let's meet up again at the [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)|Village Pump]]. |
||
[[User:ScrupulousScribe|ScrupulousScribe]] ([[User talk:ScrupulousScribe|talk]]) 19:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC) |
[[User:ScrupulousScribe|ScrupulousScribe]] ([[User talk:ScrupulousScribe|talk]]) 19:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
== February 2021 == |
|||
Your [[Special:Diff/1006680196|comment]] towards Joelle there is a borderline personal attack, in reply to a very accurate comment she made. Since your only activities are to promote and complain, this is a warning that unless you move-on I'll unfortunately have to report you as [[WP:NOTHERE|not being here for the encyclopedia]]. The community has its processes and policies, including [[WP:MEDRS]], [[WP:PRIMARY]], [[WP:SPS]], [[WP:PA]]. Ignoring them leads nowhere. Thanks, —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 00:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:36, 15 February 2021
Dinglelingy, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Dinglelingy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC) |
General sanctions alert
Template:Z33 El_C 01:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Suggestion
Dingle, I read this essay yesterday and this essay earlier today, and I would suggest that you read them too and close the ANI. I created this account on the urge to right something that I felt was wrong, and while it hasn't been hugely successful in the way I went about it, I believe I have achieved my overall objective, and I trust that other editors who understand the science, as well as WP Policy, will pick up where we left off. While they often act obtuse, our contrarian friends are slowly coming around to realizing that the lab leak theory wasn't quite what they first thought it was, and if you listen in on their conversations (here), you can see some cogs starting to turn in their heads (they're past the second stage of realizing that the leak doesn't mean "Bioweapon + Trump + bleh", but they are still a bit before the final stage of understanding the risks posed by certain gain of function studies). Let's meet up again at the Village Pump. ScrupulousScribe (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
Your comment towards Joelle there is a borderline personal attack, in reply to a very accurate comment she made. Since your only activities are to promote and complain, this is a warning that unless you move-on I'll unfortunately have to report you as not being here for the encyclopedia. The community has its processes and policies, including WP:MEDRS, WP:PRIMARY, WP:SPS, WP:PA. Ignoring them leads nowhere. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 00:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)