Antifinnugor~enwiki (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Antifinnugor~enwiki (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:You explained, that you do not understand, how a simple word table should be set up understandable, and also, that you think, words that are clearly unrelated in meaning and also in form, are cognates. This is very unlikely. However, all this is your problem, not mine. [[User:Antifinnugor|Antifinnugor]] 09:57, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
:You explained, that you do not understand, how a simple word table should be set up understandable, and also, that you think, words that are clearly unrelated in meaning and also in form, are cognates. This is very unlikely. However, all this is your problem, not mine. [[User:Antifinnugor|Antifinnugor]] 09:57, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
||
==defamation== |
|||
delete. but note that the duplication was a clumsy attempt at pagemoving, an not intended as spam. (i.e. the "Critic" one would have become a redirect). I originally supported the creation of a detailed article of FU criticism. In my understanding, an article should be deleted if the title has no promise of becoming a relevant article, while the content may of course be changed without deletion. However, in the weeks of discussion about the issue, no material worthy of more than a brief paragraph has come to light, and I do not think the article has any promise until more detail is accumulated in the Criticism section on Finno-Ugric. (so far, I have seen one peer-reviewed linguist "debunking" FU, and the peer-review I have seen about that work was utterly condemning. This one instance is still mentioned in the main article. This article could be about the political controversy in Hungary, but asking for such an article is asking for trouble. But I think Magyar nationalism would be the proper place to discuss these things. |
|||
Talk:Finno-Ugric_languages#Finno-Ugric_as_a_political_issue,[3] (http://www.google.com/search?q=hungary+magyar+nationalism+finno-ugric) dab (ᛏ) 10:19, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Magyar nationalism? You mean Antimagyar defamation page? Antifinnugor 18:58, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
|||
:bachman, you are an angaged hater and a defaming person. |
Revision as of 10:18, 20 December 2004
- archive1: 19:40, 21 Jul 2004 – 18:26, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- archive2: 04:01, 2004 Nov 11 (UTC) – 04:10, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- archive3: 09:41, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC) – 08:23, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
AFU, you accuse me of hate and what not. I am not reversing your edits, but I explained why people who do are correct.
- bachman, the reversing orgies are incorrect to the bones.
Have you read the article on cognate? Have you understood that a cognate is not the same as a translation? Then you understand that nobody thinks that ín means vein.
- bachman, if ín is in the row where the corresponding English word is vein, then people think, that ín means vein. Understood?
We know, ok? It means sinew. We are talking about cognates. Linguists think that the words suoni and ín are related even though one means vein and the other sinew.
- bachman, why should they think that? Those words have in meaning very little in common, and sound very differently. It is pure phantasy, that they are cognates.
Do you get it? no? pity, because I will not explain it again. dab (ᛏ) 10:22, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- You explained, that you do not understand, how a simple word table should be set up understandable, and also, that you think, words that are clearly unrelated in meaning and also in form, are cognates. This is very unlikely. However, all this is your problem, not mine. Antifinnugor 09:57, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
defamation
delete. but note that the duplication was a clumsy attempt at pagemoving, an not intended as spam. (i.e. the "Critic" one would have become a redirect). I originally supported the creation of a detailed article of FU criticism. In my understanding, an article should be deleted if the title has no promise of becoming a relevant article, while the content may of course be changed without deletion. However, in the weeks of discussion about the issue, no material worthy of more than a brief paragraph has come to light, and I do not think the article has any promise until more detail is accumulated in the Criticism section on Finno-Ugric. (so far, I have seen one peer-reviewed linguist "debunking" FU, and the peer-review I have seen about that work was utterly condemning. This one instance is still mentioned in the main article. This article could be about the political controversy in Hungary, but asking for such an article is asking for trouble. But I think Magyar nationalism would be the proper place to discuss these things. Talk:Finno-Ugric_languages#Finno-Ugric_as_a_political_issue,[3] (http://www.google.com/search?q=hungary+magyar+nationalism+finno-ugric) dab (ᛏ) 10:19, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC) Magyar nationalism? You mean Antimagyar defamation page? Antifinnugor 18:58, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- bachman, you are an angaged hater and a defaming person.