|
|||||||||
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
June 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
thete are no Iban violations by me outstanding, if so please show diffs. And should an adminwho just called for me to be banned be handing out a block. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Violation 1[1][2] is enough to get you blocked for two weeks. And, if we should choose to judge your by your own standards, given that you think this is a violation, then we can include another: [3] (this example was as useful for maintenance of the block as the previous comment). Should we include another week for that? I'm not even going to include the countless times I cut you slack when TopGun mentioned violations on my talk page (and which other users agreed were violations). In any case, I have no problem declining this unblock because I'm sure you'll file another request as I am supposedly biased against you in the case. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock
Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Diff one and two as shown Magog are not violations as it was self reverted, which would make this block purely punitive.This is not an iban vio as Magog says[4] as it is reporting at ANI an IBAN violation and discussing IBAN violations are not a violation, they are an exemption. I have been blocked by an admin who has called for me to be banned from editing, which has now been enforced by an admin I am in dispute with on ANI. I have no IBAN violations outstanding, this block is purely punitive and needs to be overturned. Darkness Shines (talk) 3:33 am, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
A general statement about violations without supporting diffs is not a report on an IBAN violation but is a comment on the user. regentspark (comment) 14:08, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You've used up your capital for self-reverts. You cannot make an edit and then self-revert when you're reported and expect to have this continue ad infinitum. This is the fourth time this has happened. We've been more than patient. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)- I have struck the above comments, I do not think it right a highly involved admin is coming over here to poison the well. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Unblock III
Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Regents park rejection is flawed. Why would I need to provide a diff to the vio I mentioned when it was in that very thread. The fact that it was seen by various admins and not acted upon left me little choice but to mention it. I was commenting on IBAN violations, that is an exemption. Again, I have been blocked by an admin who called for me to be banned before he blocked, that is entirely inappropriate. I was refused my first unblock request by an admin who I am not only in a dispute with at ANI but who has now also called for me to be banned claiming "everything is my fault" This block is purely punitive which is against the blocking policy. Darkness Shines (talk) 01:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have an interaction ban with TopGun. You reverted TopGun's addition. Seems clear enough to me. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In all fairness, if one party is unblocked for a confirmed IBAN violation, the other party should be unblocked immediately also. Especially when both parties have had a largely equal number of vios (see Salvio's talk for more). This would be balanced. Are we balanced and fair here? We will see. JCAla (talk) 08:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Unblock IV
Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Seraphimblade has declined even though I had self reverted the violation he mentions. He has basically said the block is punitive. The violation was reverted as such there is no violation please unblock me. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The current block is for continuing IBAN violations over a lengthy period, of which the latest was just one example. I think the only way we're going to get it through to you that you really need to stop this feud is to make you sit out a block whenever you even slightly violate the ban. As such, this block is preventative rather than punitive, and I suggest you use the time while blocked to think about how you are going to avoid this very long battle of yours turning into an indefinite block or a ban from the project. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock V
Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Again, I have been blocked by an involved admin which is a violation of policy. The block is purely punitive as the error was self reverted, this block does not prevent any disruption whatsoever. As Dennis Brown says here[5] More importantly, it was an admitted mistake, so blocking would be less than optimal here since we block to prevent rather than punish. This was in response to a similar error were I had self reverted. I will also point out that Salvio giuliano has given editors the opportunity to self revert accidental violations. The fact that I reverted the error without complaint is proof that I knew I was fully at fault. This entire block is a violation of policy, blocked by an admin calling for me to be banned. Refused my first unblock by an admin calling for me to be banned. The same admin restores comments I have removed from my talk page so as to poison the well. There is a discussion at ANI to ban me, and I cannot even defend myself. Unblock me now. Darkness Shines (talk) 8:33 am, Today (UTC−4)
Accept reason:
It's probably to late for you but go ahead and defend yourself on ANI. Magog is right about your habit of reverting and then undoing the revert so, if you do survive at ANI, don't push things. regentspark (comment) 13:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes indeed - the excuse of "I interacted with him, but then I reverted myself, so it's OK" won't wash any more, because you keep doing it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Regent, thank you for being fair. Boing, to err is human. I have never intentionally set out to break the Iban. The last one was a stupid mistake as I had not noticed Mar4d had restored content I could not touch, he had been slowmo edit warring other content into that template for quite a few days and then added the content which got me blocked on his last revert of it. If one makes a mistake and fixes it it should not be used as a weapon against him. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- It's the cumulative effect of things DS (and a bit of the 'boy who cried wolf'). My suggestion to you is that you stop aggressively defending yourself and instead focus on presenting an editing plan for the future. Attacking Magog or pleading unfair treatment won't work at this stage. --regentspark (comment) 14:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Regent, thank you for being fair. Boing, to err is human. I have never intentionally set out to break the Iban. The last one was a stupid mistake as I had not noticed Mar4d had restored content I could not touch, he had been slowmo edit warring other content into that template for quite a few days and then added the content which got me blocked on his last revert of it. If one makes a mistake and fixes it it should not be used as a weapon against him. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Sock
[6] This is an IP sock of Lagoo sab Darkness Shines (talk) 01:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Continuing mediation
Would you be interested in continuing the mediation? If you were to agree to not edit the topic while mediating and mediate in good faith, I could propose this to the blocking admin. Sunray (talk) 07:52, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Some Lassi for you!
Some cool Lassi for you | |
Have some and chill out! ;) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 08:40, 14 June 2012 (UTC) |
- Gotta admit, I misread that header at first and got worried, this popped into my head[7] Darkness Shines (talk) 08:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Nangparbat
user:109.145.226.227 Darkness Shines (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
A beer for you!
i think a beer or two is more suitable for you :P altetendekrabbe 08:55, 14 June 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks man, that put a smile on my face. You know me to well :o) Darkness Shines (talk) 09:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Purple Barnstar | |
For continuously going through harassment by socks of Nangparbat, but still staying true to the site. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC) |
Climate change & Afghan security
Have you come across any climate change related aspects during your reading of security issues as regards Afghanistan? I'm really keen to know. AshLin (talk) 10:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Some in J&K regarding glacial melt. Some due to massive deforestation in Afghanistan. What in particular are you after? Darkness Shines (talk) 10:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)