Content deleted Content added
Darkness Shines (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:::I don't want to mess up the FA page so I'll ask it here. If it already passes the criteria, why wasn't it promoted the last time around? I am definitely puzzled. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 20:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC) |
:::I don't want to mess up the FA page so I'll ask it here. If it already passes the criteria, why wasn't it promoted the last time around? I am definitely puzzled. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 20:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
::::Because the usual suspects jumped in and I lost my temper, so other that Hamiltonstone there were no further comments, but given what has now been written it was obviously a waste of time. One reviewer is suggesting Bose as a source, what a joke. This BTW is the "scholar" who has said that the rapes only numbered in the thousands, and in one paper said the Pakistani military had committed no rapes at all. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines#top|talk]]) 21:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC) |
::::Because the usual suspects jumped in and I lost my temper, so other that Hamiltonstone there were no further comments, but given what has now been written it was obviously a waste of time. One reviewer is suggesting Bose as a source, what a joke. This BTW is the "scholar" who has said that the rapes only numbered in the thousands, and in one paper said the Pakistani military had committed no rapes at all. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines#top|talk]]) 21:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
==Notification of report== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. |
Revision as of 22:17, 15 October 2013
DYK for John Rope
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. Had you had any thoughts about taking this back to FAC? I thought probably we were over the POV issues raised by one particular editor, but that the appearance on the FAC page of that discussion, together with Dr Blofield's comments, may have discouraged further reviews. I'd be cautiously optimistic about it running again from scratch... hamiltonstone (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- The one particular editor will find something else to prevent it going through, but I was thinking of trying it again at any rate. Will probably do it tonight when I get back from the pub. Thanks. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- On second thoughts I just did it now, I would likly muff it up later Darkness Shines (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't want to mess up the FA page so I'll ask it here. If it already passes the criteria, why wasn't it promoted the last time around? I am definitely puzzled. --regentspark (comment) 20:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Because the usual suspects jumped in and I lost my temper, so other that Hamiltonstone there were no further comments, but given what has now been written it was obviously a waste of time. One reviewer is suggesting Bose as a source, what a joke. This BTW is the "scholar" who has said that the rapes only numbered in the thousands, and in one paper said the Pakistani military had committed no rapes at all. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't want to mess up the FA page so I'll ask it here. If it already passes the criteria, why wasn't it promoted the last time around? I am definitely puzzled. --regentspark (comment) 20:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)