185.240.17.46 (talk) →My books: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic |
Undid revision 1190368463 by 185.240.17.46 (talk) Tag: Undo |
||
Line 242: | Line 242: | ||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Nine}} |
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Nine}} |
||
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC) |
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
== My books == |
|||
Im help you.! |
|||
uie [[Special:Contributions/185.240.17.46|185.240.17.46]] ([[User talk:185.240.17.46|talk]]) 14:15, 17 December 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:02, 17 December 2023
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Administrators' newsletter – November 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC) QueryHello, Daniel, As far as I can see, you are the admin closer who is the most adept at finding a consensus opinion in the most complicated AFD discussions (or at least you are willing to try!). Do you want to take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denial of atrocities during the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and make a judgment? I'd likely close this as No consensus which wouldn't satisfy anyone and I'm hoping that you can see through the thicket of opinions on this hot topic and come to a decisive closure of this case. If not, that's fine, I just thought I'd ask. Thank you for considering this request. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Invitation to join the Fifteen Year SocietyI'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. Best regards, Jax 0677 (talk) 23:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC) --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC) Australian IP editorHi Daniel, Their most recent IPs appear to be:
Regards, TarnishedPathtalk 11:16, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Would it be possible to Move a Deleted article to Draft?Hi Daniel, I discovered an article i publish got deleted with the last 24hrs by yourself, i just wanted to know would it be possible to move the deleted article to my draft so i can further improve it? instead of everything being gone? thank you. Frankymulls (talk) 22:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
|
- @Frankymulls: I presume you mean B Major (South African musician), which was just deleted and salted due to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B Major (South African musician)? Mach61 is correct, if it was speedy deleted, but this wasn't. The first paragraph of WP:RFU covers this. No, you may not have it undeleted and userfied in your userspace or draft. There is a draft located at Draft:B Major (Producer) which you created. But, seriously, how many deletion discussions do we have to go through on this person? We've been through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B major (person), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B Major (Music Producer), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B Major (South African musician) already. The person simply isn't notable, and nothing has changed that makes him notable. I don't see the point of all this. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Closed as redirect
On your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Rock Peak you changed Red Rock Peak to a simple redirect to Mirabito Range. It would have been more useful to our readers to have redirected to Mirabito Range#Red Rock Peak, and also to have removed {{main|Red Rock Peak}} from the section on ===Red Rock Peak=== in Mirabito Range. That way, links to Red Rock Peak go directly to where the information on this feature can be found, and readers do not see a circular link from this section to the parent article header. If the information on the child article did not have a target section header, you could add an anchor like {{anchor|Red Rock Peak}} in front of the content from the child article, and redirect to that anchor. I have cleaned this one up. but you may want to consider this with AfD closures resulting in merges or redirects in the future. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Aymatth2, firstly apologies for the previous reply (if you saw it in your notifications) yesterday - my response was a bit asshole-y, and totally unwarranted. Thanks for your feedback, noted - one thing that would help us when closing debates to avoid ambiguity is if you could write "Redirect to Mirabito Range#Red Rock Peak" explicitly, that way can minimise confusion on my part. I know you referenced linking to a section in your comment but sometimes putting it right in front of our faces with a wikilink etc. can reduce the risk of potential errors like mine. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 21:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. I added sections for features like Red Rock Peak to the parent after voting for a redirect, so there would be a target for the redirect. Should have changed the wording of the vote. There are a whole lot of little stubs like this where the content is worth keeping, but only as a section in a parent article. I would like to see them all replaced by clean redirects to the sections. A redirect to the parent title only makes sense if the redirect name is a synonym. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just saw we have a software bug. When I click on Mirabito Range#Red Rock Peak on my phone I am taken to a point well past the section header. Can't win. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- On desktop I'm taken to a point above the section, but I think that's because there isn't enough content below it yet so the bottom of the page is 'too high'. Daniel (talk) 04:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- My laptop must have a smaller screen than yours. The section title is neatly aligned at the top of the window, and I have a few pixels left to scroll down. But if I click on Mirabito Range#Thomson Peak on the laptop I get the effect you do: taken to a point above the section. I can live with that.
- But see the screenshots to the right from a click on Mirabito Range#Red Rock Peak on my phone. The first has scrolled down well past the section title. The second is after I set the default font to the smallest size, and displays as it should. This looks like a bug that affects people with poor eyesight. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:31, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- On desktop I'm taken to a point above the section, but I think that's because there isn't enough content below it yet so the bottom of the page is 'too high'. Daniel (talk) 04:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Just saw we have a software bug. When I click on Mirabito Range#Red Rock Peak on my phone I am taken to a point well past the section header. Can't win. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. I added sections for features like Red Rock Peak to the parent after voting for a redirect, so there would be a target for the redirect. Should have changed the wording of the vote. There are a whole lot of little stubs like this where the content is worth keeping, but only as a section in a parent article. I would like to see them all replaced by clean redirects to the sections. A redirect to the parent title only makes sense if the redirect name is a synonym. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Read this
Please read this page: Talk:List of Puma sponsorships Kbcars123 (talk) 03:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Kbcars123, you will need to be significantly more specific about what you want to see and why you want to see it. The article will not be restored as an article on Wikipedia, but if there's something in particular you need from the article I will provide it to you here. Daniel (talk) 03:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I will be more specific. Kbcars123 (talk) 03:47, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- The reason why I want the list of puma sponsorships page back is because i need to show my sister that they stopped sponsoring the Israel football association, according to an edit made in the page. I needed to show her this to show that they don’t support Israel anymore, which is obviously a good thing. When I was about to show her, it got deleted. So, please, restore the page. Kbcars123 (talk) 03:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- The page isn't being restored, as a consensus of Wikipedians wanted it deleted at the AfD discussion you tried to re-open. I can confirm that the Israel Football Federation isn't listed on the last version of the page; an unregistered editor removed the below from the page on 18 November 2023, however did not provide a source showing where they stopped sponsoring the IFA:
- Israel Football Association
- I won't be undeleting the article on the basis you requested. Daniel (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion
Good day Daniel. How did you come to the conclusion that consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion was to merge? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- There is a consensus there not to retain the article (delete and merge combined), and out of the two options, I chose merge as it is a valid alternate to deletion that was not rendered as an invalid option during the discussion. Daniel (talk) 19:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
-
- Ajpolino
- Lourdes
- Mairi
- RockMFR
- Somno
- WilyD
- Beeblebrox → Just Step Sideways
- Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
- Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
- The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Deletion review for 2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion
An editor has asked for a deletion review of 2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jax 0677 (talk) 16:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Permanent link for reference: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 December 9. Daniel (talk) 00:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Relist
What would you like to accomplish by relisting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghetto Love (Karl Wolf song)? --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am hoping for additional participation to either shore up the 'keep' consensus, or alternatively people to argue Oaktree's contributions and sources presented. As the template says, "generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus". Daniel (talk) 00:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Daniel,
I tried to close this AFD discussion but the XFDcloser won't let me, saying that it's already closed but the page history says that it clearly isn't. Have you run into this glitch before? I purged my cache, refreshed the screen but still, nada. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Liz, sometimes - but normally after refreshing it works. I got the same error here as you, "Discussion already closed (reload page to see the close)". I wonder why...could ask at Wikipedia talk:XFDcloser maybe? Cheers, Daniel (talk) 03:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Daniel,
Waterville High School is a priority requested page on Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine/Requested articles.
You deleted the original Waterville High School page in 2007 (which I highly doubt rings a bell). Could you possibly undelete it as it is a priority request to WP:MAINE?
Cheers - Akyyka (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Akyyka, I've undeleted it as a contested prod. You'll see from the article it's in pretty bad shape so might be worth moving to draft-space straight away to work on it? Up to you though. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have a draft in progress in my sandbox
- Thank you very much
Akyyka (talk) 18:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Nine years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)