Dan the Plumber (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Note your topic ban is reset to last one week '''after''' this block expires. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 19:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC) |
Note your topic ban is reset to last one week '''after''' this block expires. --[[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 19:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
: I was only trying to keep a few wikipedia articles on Syria from resembling Sputnik and RT. I hope you bloody well keep an eye on those articles and the way those pro regime twisters 'edit' in such a way that OPCW reports are 'selectively' read/misread and RS material is misquoted. They swarm all over them with their twisted narratives to push. I wouldn't mind if they respected sources but they don't. They misquote, excise, misrepresent, distort. They make articles on Syria unreadable if you aren't as brain dead and cynical as they are. [[User:Dan the Plumber|Dan the Plumber]] ([[User talk:Dan the Plumber#top|talk]]) 19:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:58, 8 July 2018
March 2017
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Neil Taylor (footballer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed that you've changed De Bock's club over to Leeds. I'm not going to change it back as it's "referenced", but note that the Yorkshire Post are the only ones that are reporting this (plus a couple of others quoting the YP). There has been no official announcement from the club. I'll leave it to you to decide whether you think the ref is adequate. Nzd (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Terrorist96 (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
I've closed this report with a warning to you. --NeilN talk to me 15:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Note
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--NeilN talk to me 15:00, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dan the Plumber. Thank you. Terrorist96 (talk) 03:51, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Daraa offensive
I would ask that you cancel your edit here [1]. First, the source itself also refers to them as "government forces", and not just "forces loyal to Assad". Furthermore throughout all Syria-related battle articles the uniformed wording that we have been using to describe them for years is: government forces/troops/fighters, pro-government forces/troops/fighters, Syrian military, Syrian Army, etc. We have avoided using wording such as: Assad loyalists, regime forces/troops/fighters, pro-regime forces/troops/fighters, etc, since it was determined this wording is not really neutral and is rather subjective. Plus, the "Assad" government is still officially considered and recognized by most (including the UN) as the Syrian government. Hope this clears it up now. Second, your edit removed the date from the sentence and also canceled out the correct title of the source/report to an incorrect one. EkoGraf (talk) 23:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Topic ban
For violating WP:1RR on Douma chemical attack and a general battleground attitude you are now subject to the following sanction for one week:
Topic banned from making any edits about the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. This includes talk pages.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the community authorised general sanctions for the Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. This sanction has been recorded in the log. Please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction on the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page) and you may ask for clarification of the scope of this ban. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.
--NeilN talk to me 23:54, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
You need to start taking WP:1RR seriously. It doesn't matter how right you think your edits are, breaking this restriction is going to get you sanctioned as everyone has to follow the same restrictions. Also if you think Terrorist96's user name is against policy, bring it up at WP:RFCN. Otherwise, please drop the matter. --NeilN talk to me 00:05, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- My username has already been litigated [2] and I would prefer to avoid double jeopardy. Terrorist96 (talk) 00:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Terrorist96: Thanks for linking to that decision. Dan the Plumber, you'll have to accept the fact the community has decided to let this editor use this name. --NeilN talk to me 00:31, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN talk to me 19:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Note your topic ban is reset to last one week after this block expires. --NeilN talk to me 19:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- I was only trying to keep a few wikipedia articles on Syria from resembling Sputnik and RT. I hope you bloody well keep an eye on those articles and the way those pro regime twisters 'edit' in such a way that OPCW reports are 'selectively' read/misread and RS material is misquoted. They swarm all over them with their twisted narratives to push. I wouldn't mind if they respected sources but they don't. They misquote, excise, misrepresent, distort. They make articles on Syria unreadable if you aren't as brain dead and cynical as they are. Dan the Plumber (talk) 19:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)