Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
ChyranandChloe (talk | contribs) →GW Discussion: new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm bullied by the cyber-thugs on Wikipedia. If you ever try to question the information that users present as cannon on wikipedia, you get shot down in about 30 seconds. So liberalism has run amuk on Wikipedia, i.e. they only allow glowing information about their dear leader, President Barack Hussein Obama. They only allow alarmist, wild, wacky claims that the earth is warming, when in fact, it is cooling, and the list goes on and on. It appears that Wikipedia is just another appendage of the wild, leftist, lame-stream media run amuk with liberal ideaologies and theories. |
I'm bullied by the cyber-thugs on Wikipedia. If you ever try to question the information that users present as cannon on wikipedia, you get shot down in about 30 seconds. So liberalism has run amuk on Wikipedia, i.e. they only allow glowing information about their dear leader, President Barack Hussein Obama. They only allow alarmist, wild, wacky claims that the earth is warming, when in fact, it is cooling, and the list goes on and on. It appears that Wikipedia is just another appendage of the wild, leftist, lame-stream media run amuk with liberal ideaologies and theories. |
||
== GW Discussion == |
|||
Would you be so kind to start the discussion about this diff?[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_warming&action=historysubmit&diff=337077824&oldid=336985977] [[User:ChyranandChloe|ChyranandChloe]] ([[User talk:ChyranandChloe|talk]]) 22:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:34, 10 January 2010
I'm bullied by the cyber-thugs on Wikipedia. If you ever try to question the information that users present as cannon on wikipedia, you get shot down in about 30 seconds. So liberalism has run amuk on Wikipedia, i.e. they only allow glowing information about their dear leader, President Barack Hussein Obama. They only allow alarmist, wild, wacky claims that the earth is warming, when in fact, it is cooling, and the list goes on and on. It appears that Wikipedia is just another appendage of the wild, leftist, lame-stream media run amuk with liberal ideaologies and theories.
GW Discussion
Would you be so kind to start the discussion about this diff?[1] ChyranandChloe (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)