MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Daedalus969/Archive 14. |
→Hey Daed: new section |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Hello. Could you kindly tell me how you justify that a collection of links to archived AN/I discussions constitutes a personal attack? Please also explain why you've been showing up frequently to make changes to my user page or to make negative comments on the way I edit it? Please answer here. Thank you. <b>[[User:Radiopathy|<font color="#006600">R</font><font color="#0D8147">ad</font><font color="#009966">io</font><font color="#009999">pa</font><font color="#1E99CC">th</font><font color="#67B2DE ">y</font>]]</b> [[User talk:Radiopathy|•talk•]] 18:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) |
Hello. Could you kindly tell me how you justify that a collection of links to archived AN/I discussions constitutes a personal attack? Please also explain why you've been showing up frequently to make changes to my user page or to make negative comments on the way I edit it? Please answer here. Thank you. <b>[[User:Radiopathy|<font color="#006600">R</font><font color="#0D8147">ad</font><font color="#009966">io</font><font color="#009999">pa</font><font color="#1E99CC">th</font><font color="#67B2DE ">y</font>]]</b> [[User talk:Radiopathy|•talk•]] 18:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
:A similar page I once had was constructed the same way, and deleted for the same reason. As to your editing habits, you are not allowed to call good-faith edits vandalism, as such is a personal attack against an editor. I've already explained this to you, so I don't see why you're asking me to do so again.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 20:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC) |
:A similar page I once had was constructed the same way, and deleted for the same reason. As to your editing habits, you are not allowed to call good-faith edits vandalism, as such is a personal attack against an editor. I've already explained this to you, so I don't see why you're asking me to do so again.— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 20:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Hey Daed == |
|||
I was just getting ready to address that post. Since you've already reverted it, I'm guessing you're following this and are on top of things. Good luck, let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Although I'll be the first to admit that I'm not real knowledgeable when it comes to sock accounts. To be honest, the only reason I'm even familiar with Axman is because I'm friends with Bugs. Cheers, thanks, and best. ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#0000fa;"> ? </font>]]</span></small> 01:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:53, 12 September 2009
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
- Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
- Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
- Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
- News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
- Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 15:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
re: deletion
several other sites have leeched it as a link (displaying my full name, etc.) and I've complained to them as well. I would like the entire page deleted because it never should have been put up in the first place. I'm a huge wikipedia fan, but the last thing I want is to be mentioned and/or referenced by a name that could throw my audience off and which carries no real affiliation with my identity or works. I make this request with an urgent tone, but with sincere kindness--Can my request be obliged?
Re: certainly
Dear Daedalus
These are the remaining sites:
demo4.thaiseosubmit.com/singer-wikipedia.htm
and www.spock.com/Avi-Singer
There were several, but I've managed to get rid of the rest, I think.
Thanks for the help,
K.N. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.93.46 (talk) 08:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Axmann8
I wonder if you realize that you just restored an "unblock" request which begins "This unblock is not justified". Self-defining. :) FYI, the impostor Max Antean turns out to be another sock of User:Pioneercourthouse, who has been extremely busy today, probably with summer winding down and junior high school about to begin again. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pioneercourthouse It's apparently only Axmann8's bad luck that he reappeared after 4 months on a day when PCH went bananas. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 21:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- I should also point out that (1) I hadn't realized he had replaced his previous unblocks with a new one, or I might have restored it as you did; and (2) the restored version was denied faster than it took me to write the previous comment above. I especially like the part where he says (again) that I somehow tricked him into making comments that got him indef'd. Evidently, I'm controlling his brain somehow (although apparently not very effectively). Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 21:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
rv vandalism
When it's on my talk page, it can be reverted for any reason, or none at all. And BTW, when I put a tag on my user or talk page, I would prefer that I be the one to remove it. Radiopathy •talk• 05:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Also, what was the motivation behind your failed sockpuppet report? Radiopathy •talk• 05:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: Jedi
I would, but I am unsure as to how. I don't do many multiple XfDs, so I am not sure how to combine them together. If you can, please feel free. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- I removed them from the main MfD page. I can't outright delete them (not an admin) but they are removed from the main page. Once you get them all together onto one page, I will track down an admin to delete the unneeded MfD pages. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 07:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
I can't tell you what a relief it is when I see someone watching out for my talk page. I genuinely appreciate the support. Gotta run, but enjoy a cookie in the meantime. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
And thank you again.:) PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok I Promise
Promise i had copyright of all poster by Manhwalover —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manhwalover (talk • contribs) 01:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Abce2|TalkSign 02:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nom of one of my subpages
Hello. Could you kindly tell me how you justify that a collection of links to archived AN/I discussions constitutes a personal attack? Please also explain why you've been showing up frequently to make changes to my user page or to make negative comments on the way I edit it? Please answer here. Thank you. Radiopathy •talk• 18:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- A similar page I once had was constructed the same way, and deleted for the same reason. As to your editing habits, you are not allowed to call good-faith edits vandalism, as such is a personal attack against an editor. I've already explained this to you, so I don't see why you're asking me to do so again.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey Daed
I was just getting ready to address that post. Since you've already reverted it, I'm guessing you're following this and are on top of things. Good luck, let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Although I'll be the first to admit that I'm not real knowledgeable when it comes to sock accounts. To be honest, the only reason I'm even familiar with Axman is because I'm friends with Bugs. Cheers, thanks, and best. ;) — Ched : ? 01:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)