→Template-ing: new section |
|||
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
You seem to have done the same thing you accused me off. At any rate, it wasn't a "welcome" warning, precisely b/c they are well-versed it was upped. |
You seem to have done the same thing you accused me off. At any rate, it wasn't a "welcome" warning, precisely b/c they are well-versed it was upped. |
||
And if was because it can be construed as a response to uncivility, you will see, based on the template, it was uncivil. |
And if was because it can be construed as a response to uncivility, you will see, based on the template, it was uncivil. |
||
⚫ | |||
Seeming the same thing happened [[User talk:Daedalus969#Regarding your message|here]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 12:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:50, 17 November 2008
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
RE:
I was trying to make {{munch}} work so that if you add in the |guy parameter it would change the pronouns. This is how it looks now:
{{subst:munch|~~~}}
Guy version: {{subst:munch|~~~|boy=yes}}
Think you could work magic? :) And thanks for offering to help! Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. Magic worked.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 01:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- You're my hero! Hell, why not - have a cookie.
- Sure, if you have the time/want to; I'm happy the way it is, though. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
tb
Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at roux's talk page. |
You can at any time by removing this template. |
Re:Speedy deletion of Tejas Networks
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Tinu Cherian - 10:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Saw the ANI post
Putting that title on the blacklist seems to be the best idea or mentioning it to one of the admin bots around who block blatant usernames as soon as they are created (doesn't work with SUL accounts though i dont think). Since Luna's talk is protected mention to him that a range block was implemented on that editor (discussion here) last month for 2 weeks but seems not have made a difference. You know there are so many great things to do in this city and with summer approaching i know the last place i want to be is in the house - on the computer - editing wikipedia - make that vandalising wikipedia ;) 220.239.47.163 (talk) 06:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- You really want to know? ;) 220.239.47.163 (talk) 07:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Unbelievable. You really think i am the person behind the Hollback girl or whatever it is? I am trying to let you know some info. When that range block was implemented i realised that i was on the same IP range as that person. That's the only reason i wanted to let you know about this person. But if Luna or anyone wants to do another range block, thats OK of course. It won't affect me, for other reasons. Cheers 220.239.47.163 (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
respond to your message
i have responded to your message on my talk page.... --Cooljuno411 (talk) 06:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Edit
Would you please revert the last edit at the article? I don't like to get even close to 3RR. Squash Racket (talk) 07:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- I will do so only because of your recent message on the talk page of the article, not because of your message here. This would fall under WP:CANVASS, which is prohibited.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 07:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I think WP:Canvass applies to notifying specific, carefully chosen editors, not WP:ANI. Squash Racket (talk) 08:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought B.fever was an admin who had read about this at ANI. Squash Racket (talk) 12:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Re: Internet addiction
Re your message: Sorry to hear that you've become addicted to the Internet. It's not entirely uncommon and the first step is to recognize that you've reached that point. Unfortunately, I can't offer much help because I'm not qualified to really help you with. You can look into professional help, but a first step may be to try to walk away from your computer yourself. As for requesting a block to enforce a wikibreak, that would not be done for you. Blocking is not done for wikibreaks. You can use the WikiBreak Enforcer script which can help you not login to Wikipedia, though really the only truly effective method is to just not use the computer. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Friends?
Giggle, i took your advice about being a contributer.The Nice Hollaback Girl (talk) 07:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC) This template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions
- I'll consider it, but I could be called a fool if I followed blindly into the light. I'll have to wait and see what happens before I agree of anything.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 07:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, so far, so good. Let's hope it stays this way! Thanks for the note. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Re your message: From what I can tell, you tagged the article for CSD because a similar redirect was deleted through an RfD back in August. The RfD had spaces between the words, while the one you linked to did not. What did you need to know? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: I see. Everything happened back in August and nothing was created post the closure on the original RfD as far as I can tell. Therefore, I wouldn't call it disruptive. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: The RfD was still not closed at the time. Might I suggest that you not pursue this so vigorously? It's not that big of a deal. The redirects have been deleted, nothing was done post RfD closure, and everything happened months ago. There's nothing really to pursue. You're causing agitation over something that is essentially closed and done with. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your message
Why in the world should I need to explain a comment I placed on another user's talk page? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 02:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- You seem to have some very strange notions about how this place operates. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 04:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Likewise. You wrote a comment about me. It is common courtesy to tell someone when they're being talked about. You have no reason to keep such information from me.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 05:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- My one and only purpose in bringing the discussion to Skomorokh's attention was the fact that I was talking about him and felt he should be aware of it. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 02:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Likewise. You wrote a comment about me. It is common courtesy to tell someone when they're being talked about. You have no reason to keep such information from me.— Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 05:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
RE:Troublesome Templates
Though holding grudges is wrong, or so I feel, he has the right to keep his talk page as he wants it, though it would be nice of him to make it work for the rest of us (it shows up weird for me too; I think the spacing is set to too large of a number). I'll drop him a note but I won't impose anything (I know you didn't ask me to, just saying). Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 07:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Template-ing
You seem to have done the same thing you accused me off. At any rate, it wasn't a "welcome" warning, precisely b/c they are well-versed it was upped. And if was because it can be construed as a response to uncivility, you will see, based on the template, it was uncivil. Furthermore, the template was just that, a template, with an addition more that led to a "personal message [that] tends to work better in these situations."
Seeming the same thing happened here Lihaas (talk) 12:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)