→edit warring: new section |
|||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
Sorry, the above should have context--I've just noticed that you're making more edits to economics articles than just [[Economics]], and it would be nice to be able to tell which are substantive and which are minor. [[User:Cretog8|C<small>RETOG</small>8]]([[User_talk:Cretog8|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cretog8|c]]) 17:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC) |
Sorry, the above should have context--I've just noticed that you're making more edits to economics articles than just [[Economics]], and it would be nice to be able to tell which are substantive and which are minor. [[User:Cretog8|C<small>RETOG</small>8]]([[User_talk:Cretog8|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cretog8|c]]) 17:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
== edit warring == |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Economist|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Economist]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
|||
Hello-You might be new here, and so possibly don't know about the [[WP:3rr|three-revert]] guideline to limit edit warring. So, this is just a warning--you probably want to keep it in mind for the [[Economics]] article as well. [[User:Cretog8|C<small>RETOG</small>8]]([[User_talk:Cretog8|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Cretog8|c]]) 18:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:27, 6 June 2009
|
May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JNW (talk) 14:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JNW (talk) 15:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
minor edits
Hello--I'd be grateful if you limit your use of the "minor edit" tag. It's appropriate when fixing the spelling of one word, or fixing one ref or some such, but not when content is changed. People who are interested in the article might miss the edit when you do that. CRETOG8(t/c) 17:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, the above should have context--I've just noticed that you're making more edits to economics articles than just Economics, and it would be nice to be able to tell which are substantive and which are minor. CRETOG8(t/c) 17:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Economist. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
Hello-You might be new here, and so possibly don't know about the three-revert guideline to limit edit warring. So, this is just a warning--you probably want to keep it in mind for the Economics article as well. CRETOG8(t/c) 18:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)