→Discretionary sanctions - firearms: new section Tag: contentious topics alert |
Sagecandor (talk | contribs) Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
(69 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| algo = old(5d) |
| algo = old(5d) |
||
| archive = User talk:DHeyward/Archive %(counter)d |
| archive = User talk:DHeyward/Archive %(counter)d |
||
| counter = |
| counter = 22 |
||
| maxarchivesize = 50K |
| maxarchivesize = 50K |
||
| archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
| archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<small>Learn more about [[Wikipedia:New Pages Feed/Help|page curation]].</small> |
<small>Learn more about [[Wikipedia:New Pages Feed/Help|page curation]].</small> |
||
== |
== COI Notice == |
||
While this isn't looking at your editing... looking at one of the parties talk pages seems to indicate you might be interested in this. |
|||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Gaming the system?|Gaming the system?]]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 04:46, 3 September 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== [[Todd Heap]] == |
||
Please look at talk section for the article. Your assistance is requested in formulating the wording for a proposed subsection of the article. [[Special:Contributions/66.103.35.72|66.103.35.72]] ([[User talk:66.103.35.72|talk]]) 19:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC) |
|||
ESPN.com [http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/19161911/todd-heap-accidentally-hits-kills-3-year-old-daughter-moving-truck reported] her cause of death as stated in the article, which you removed. <sup>(talk page stalker)</sup> '''[[User:Crash Underride|<font color="#008caf">'''Crash'''</font>]][[User talk:Crash_Underride|<font color="#6000c6">'''Under'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Crash Underride|<font color="#6000c6">'''ride'''</font>]]''' 18:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== restored RfC == |
|||
:Until we have a name, no it's not BLP material. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward#top|talk]]) 01:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::Continued whitewashing/reversion of cited material is vandalism. "Without a name" is a rule you made up. Desist or I'll go to ANI. <font face="Cambria">[[User:Abductive|<font color="teal">'''Abductive'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Abductive|reasoning]])</font> 17:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Major donors to presidential campaigns == |
|||
It appears you deleted a RfC opened by another editor, as well as comments by two editors [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Conspiracy_theories_of_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2016&diff=736079986&oldid=736079831] from the Talk page of [[Conspiracy theories of the United States presidential election, 2016]]. I have restored it/them. The page itself has been protected by [[User:Airplaneman|Airplaneman]] due to edit warring, which happens; edit warring at a Talk page, though, is a pretty big deal. I can't imagine what you were thinking. [[User:BlueSalix|BlueSalix]] ([[User talk:BlueSalix|talk]]) 04:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC) |
|||
You said $10 million is the threshhold for a "major donor" on the Russian interference article talk page. I think it is far less. I don't believe there are more than a dozen individuals who donated more than $1 million. I could be wrong, and would be interested to see any data to the contrary. [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 23:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Personal comments == |
|||
:https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php The top 100 are all above $2 million. Soros on that list was $20 million at number 12. One of the Koch's was $4 million. The other wasn't listed so there are probably other bundling mechanisms. Devos was in the top 100 at $3.2 million. Prince was not in the top 100. --[[User:DHeyward|DHeyward]] ([[User talk:DHeyward#top|talk]]) 00:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
This comment, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Firearms&diff=738248265&oldid=738241406 "...these agenda driven accounts seek only to demonize firearms with undue weight accounts of rare use in crime"], is an inappropriate personal attack that fails to assume good faith. Please withdraw it and do not make another like it. Firearms articles, presumably including the project itself, are covered by ArbCom's discretionary sanctions that specifically prohibit behavior like this. [[User:Felsic2|Felsic2]] ([[User talk:Felsic2|talk]]) 17:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding |
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. |
||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[ |
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Felsic2|Felsic2]] ([[User talk:Felsic2|talk]]) 17:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Note: Saw it in alerts history but not in talk page history. Not sure why it wasn't showing up on talk page history, so here it is. [[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 00:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:54, 4 June 2017
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Please add comments to the bottom
A page you started (2016 Nice terrorist attack) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 2016 Nice terrorist attack, DHeyward!
Wikipedia editor Pianoman320 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for adding this redirect!
To reply, leave a comment on Pianoman320's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
COI Notice
While this isn't looking at your editing... looking at one of the parties talk pages seems to indicate you might be interested in this.
ESPN.com reported her cause of death as stated in the article, which you removed. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 18:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Major donors to presidential campaigns
You said $10 million is the threshhold for a "major donor" on the Russian interference article talk page. I think it is far less. I don't believe there are more than a dozen individuals who donated more than $1 million. I could be wrong, and would be interested to see any data to the contrary. SPECIFICO talk 23:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topindivs.php The top 100 are all above $2 million. Soros on that list was $20 million at number 12. One of the Koch's was $4 million. The other wasn't listed so there are probably other bundling mechanisms. Devos was in the top 100 at $3.2 million. Prince was not in the top 100. --DHeyward (talk) 00:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert for American politics 2
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Note: Saw it in alerts history but not in talk page history. Not sure why it wasn't showing up on talk page history, so here it is. Sagecandor (talk) 00:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)