Content deleted Content added
Cwmacdougall (talk | contribs) |
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk | contribs) →ARBCC: new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== ARBCC == |
|||
Hi, Per [[WP:DISRUPT]], failure to answer simple direct questions is indicative of disruptive editing, and that is something which is expressly prohibited by the arbitrators. In the arbs' [[WP:ARBCC]] ruling, they placed all climate articles "broadly construed" under [[WP:DS|discretionary sanctions]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Global_warming&curid=454409&diff=587585984&oldid=587583989 This edit of yours] just repeats your earlier naked assertion that there is a dispute. Will you please, at the article talk page, tell us the substance of the dispute and the [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] on which you base your reasoning? [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 01:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:51, 25 December 2013
ARBCC
Hi, Per WP:DISRUPT, failure to answer simple direct questions is indicative of disruptive editing, and that is something which is expressly prohibited by the arbitrators. In the arbs' WP:ARBCC ruling, they placed all climate articles "broadly construed" under discretionary sanctions. This edit of yours just repeats your earlier naked assertion that there is a dispute. Will you please, at the article talk page, tell us the substance of the dispute and the reliable sources on which you base your reasoning? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 01:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)