Glad you're back on |
129.169.10.56 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==I WILL DESTROY/KILL YOU VANDAL== |
|||
DO NOT MESS WITH THE BEST i.e CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY |
|||
MESS WITH THE BEST AND DIE LIKE THE REST! |
|||
You would be out of your depth in a parking lot puddle. I understand what you are trying to say, even though you obviously don't. Oh well, at least you only charge what your free advice is worth. As Abba Eban so aptly said: "His ignorance is encyclopedic." or in your case "wikipedic" |
|||
Reading your post is less interesting than watching paint dry. If wit was spit, your mouth would be drier than a shallow well in an African heat wave. There's nothing wrong with you that couldn't be cured with a little Prozac and a polo mallet, or, better yet, suicide. Maybe you wouldn't come across as such a jellyfish-sucking mental midget if your father didn't screw a plant and raised a blooming idiot; if the chief excitement in your meaningless life wasn't spotting people who are fatter than you are, or if you didn't have a face that could scare a hungry wolf off a meat truck. No, come to think of it, you would. |
|||
In conclusion, as your clue meter is reading zero, lets see if this registers: Get lost, creep! |
|||
You must really not have a life, editing unknown cricketers.. hahaha.. do u have a girlfriend? or even friends?? and i dont mean that piece of rabbit fur you rub on your dick every night. |
|||
or are u gay? u seem to be very interested in ranjit, isnt he a bit too old for u? hahaha LOSER! |
|||
--[[User:129.169.10.56|129.169.10.56]] 13:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Can you add Brian Lara Images == |
== Can you add Brian Lara Images == |
||
Please, can you or your contacts put a picture/s of this great man that does not violate copyright issues? Brian Lara Wikipedia page requires pictures of him -- a portrait image and some cricketing images. Thanks [[User:130.194.5.130|130.194.5.130]] 00:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
Please, can you or your contacts put a picture/s of this great man that does not violate copyright issues? Brian Lara Wikipedia page requires pictures of him -- a portrait image and some cricketing images. Thanks [[User:130.194.5.130|130.194.5.130]] 00:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:47, 23 April 2007
I WILL DESTROY/KILL YOU VANDAL
DO NOT MESS WITH THE BEST i.e CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY
MESS WITH THE BEST AND DIE LIKE THE REST!
You would be out of your depth in a parking lot puddle. I understand what you are trying to say, even though you obviously don't. Oh well, at least you only charge what your free advice is worth. As Abba Eban so aptly said: "His ignorance is encyclopedic." or in your case "wikipedic"
Reading your post is less interesting than watching paint dry. If wit was spit, your mouth would be drier than a shallow well in an African heat wave. There's nothing wrong with you that couldn't be cured with a little Prozac and a polo mallet, or, better yet, suicide. Maybe you wouldn't come across as such a jellyfish-sucking mental midget if your father didn't screw a plant and raised a blooming idiot; if the chief excitement in your meaningless life wasn't spotting people who are fatter than you are, or if you didn't have a face that could scare a hungry wolf off a meat truck. No, come to think of it, you would.
In conclusion, as your clue meter is reading zero, lets see if this registers: Get lost, creep!
You must really not have a life, editing unknown cricketers.. hahaha.. do u have a girlfriend? or even friends?? and i dont mean that piece of rabbit fur you rub on your dick every night.
or are u gay? u seem to be very interested in ranjit, isnt he a bit too old for u? hahaha LOSER!
--129.169.10.56 13:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Can you add Brian Lara Images
Please, can you or your contacts put a picture/s of this great man that does not violate copyright issues? Brian Lara Wikipedia page requires pictures of him -- a portrait image and some cricketing images. Thanks 130.194.5.130 00:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Regarding your edit to Brendan Taylor:
Your recent edit to Brendan Taylor (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a shared IP address to add email addresses, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, or forum links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 06:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
The general Wikipedia guideline is that appearing for a full national team is notable, but not appearing for a youth national team. Thanks, NawlinWiki 12:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
What is your source of 17-78 for his first century ? Almost all the references have it as 17-82. He scored it on the fourth day of the match, so I suspect your source used the starting date of the match instead of the one on which he scored his 100. Tintin (talk) 15:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Good work
Just wanted to drop a thank you note for the many cricket articles that you started ... Tintin 08:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Harvinder Singh
Hi just wondered why you've reversed my small addition to the Harvinder Singh page twice today without telling my why. talk Fri Apr 13 13:18:40 CEST 2007
Are you aware of this? I have seen a lot of your articles, I am suprised how small this article is you are usually more comprehensive. That you have put so little in this article makes me think there is little to say?Garrie 04:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
You're right, there is very little to say about the guy at this stage hence it being a stub. I've seen alot of articles on here about non first class cricketers who have represented their country at under 19 level. I reckon there would be atleast 30 of them, not saying that they should be there but I merely felt that a precedent had been sent. Now this guy has captained his country - http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/australia/engine/current/match/288202.html so if any of these players are notable than he would be one I feel. Cheers Crickettragic
12345ak contribs
In your contributions (Special:Contributions/crickettragic) it looks like you are reverting all of 12345ak (talk · contribs) contributions. What's up? --Iamunknown 23:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Revert-warring in a very big way. 12-hour block to prevent disruption & article is now fully protected. Your edit-warring friend is also getting the same - Alison☺ 00:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm not an admin, but I spotted 12345ak's post on ANI. The whole situation is rather confusing. The one thing that seemed clear to me, though, is that neither of you communicated with one another. Is that a fair assessment? --Iamunknown 01:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- I am guilty of not explaining to the guy why I was deleting the material sure, but that was only because he was well aware. If and when I get unblocked I am not sure whether I am even going to start posting here again, that is how peeved off I am about how this has been handled. Firstly you need to look at the material he kept adding, clearly unacceptable and with a link to a hate site. When I started removing this material I was flooded with harassing messages on my talk page which I deleted. When I got up this morning I see that this person has reversed my last 30 edits to various articles. Please take a look at them yourself and you will see that my edits were genuine. I then posted a complaint to WikipediaCricket and asked the more experienced members how best to deal with this. I then found that over the next hour this person was editing this post and reversing the names. The harassment then contiued with the user posting the reversed complaint in the place which you found it. --Crickettragic 01:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- The diffs are indeed everywhere. :-D I am inclined to think, based upon 12345ak's previous edits, that he or she moved the link to the bottom (which was originally added by an anonymous user, see [1]) which is, although the link is to a hate site, proper formatting.
- I assumed after seeing the diffs that it was a failure to communicate. I also noticed (no hard feelings) that you haven't used your user talk page very much [2]. That might be a good thing to do when your block expires or when you get unblocked. (Also about that, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Betacommand/Proposed_decision#Communication; bad things happen when people don't communicate.) :-)
- I'll leave a note at Alison's talk page on your and 12345ak's behalf. --Iamunknown 01:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Crickettragic, Are you still blocked? I can't see any autoblocks active. Post a msg here to advise. —Moondyne 04:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Not seeing one either. That IP address is coming up as unblocked - Alison☺ 04:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
BlockID was #474372 - see here - Alison☺ 04:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Everything seems ok now, don't know what was going on. Anyway thanks for the unblock, glad we got that sorted. Hope I didn't come across as rude, I was just very frustrated that is all. Cheers —Crickettragic 04:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- That was wierd, but glad that its fixed. FYI, the guy and his sockpuppets have been indefblocked. I can only reiterate what Alison said: If you start to get drawn into an edit war, it's vital that you keep communicating. Remember Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. —Moondyne 04:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- (ec) Glad it's all sorted out now. And I do feel bad about blocking you. Given the stress that guy was putting you under, what you did was understandable. I should have researched in more depth & was unaware of the ANI reporting. Glad you're back again now. BTW - I'll keep a watch on your user and talk page for a while just in case that guy comes back to harrass you. Thanks to Iamunknown and Moondyne for getting involved :) - Alison☺ 04:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)