→Disrupting AfD: new section |
→Disrupting AfD: note |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
AfD is not the place to air your grievances about a specific editor. I have removed your various personal attacks against {{User|Delicious carbuncle}}. Before you go and accuse us of ganging up on you, see [[User talk:Francophonie&Androphilie/Archive/Archive 3#Block]]. If you have complaints about DC, take them to AN/I or ArbCom.''' — <u><font color="#000000">[[User:F&A|Francophonie<font color="deeppink">&</font>Androphilie]]</font></u>'''<sup>(''<u><font color="#000000">[[User talk:F&A|Je vous invite à me parler]]</font></u>'')</sup> 10:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
AfD is not the place to air your grievances about a specific editor. I have removed your various personal attacks against {{User|Delicious carbuncle}}. Before you go and accuse us of ganging up on you, see [[User talk:Francophonie&Androphilie/Archive/Archive 3#Block]]. If you have complaints about DC, take them to AN/I or ArbCom.''' — <u><font color="#000000">[[User:F&A|Francophonie<font color="deeppink">&</font>Androphilie]]</font></u>'''<sup>(''<u><font color="#000000">[[User talk:F&A|Je vous invite à me parler]]</font></u>'')</sup> 10:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Hi Craddock1. Please chill out and take a step back for a moment. I have considered blocking you for a bit to stop the disruption you are causing, but I feel a final plea is a better bet for now. On Wikipedia we have an important guideline of "Comment on the content, not the editor". Your very first contribution to that AFD is to attack the nominator, and it has gone downhill from there. All you are really doing is undermining the AFD in a way which will not benefit you. Take a moment to step back, consider how you could marshal an argument to explain how the article meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, and continue with a reasoned explanation in the deletion discussion. Continuing with your current behaviour will end up with you being blocked. --'''[[user:ErrantX|Errant]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:ErrantX|chat!]])</sup> 11:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:22, 31 December 2012
Your submission at Articles for creation
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch (talk) 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Amirite
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Amirite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Amirite for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amirite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amirite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
December 2012
Hello, I'm Zymurgy. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Social media, because to me it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks, Zymurgy (talk) 00:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Re:Amirite.com Article
I'm not the one who made the Articles for deletion nomination. Delicious carbuncle was the one who did so; you'd be better off talking with that user. Also, I can't close the nomination right now per the Articles for deletion project rules; it would have to be done by an admin. Lugia2453 (talk) 00:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Links on social media
Hi, thanks for your message. The main social media articles are referenced in the lead so it didn't seem appropriate to include a selection plus some newer ones per your edit. Good luck with your editing--Zymurgy (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Canvassing
Please read Wikipedia:Canvassing and then delete all of the talk page appeals you've made to have a Deletion Discussion closed. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 00:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SarahStierch (talk) 00:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SarahStierch (talk) 00:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm TBrandley. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amirite without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 07:18, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amirite with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 07:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
I removed this content because the user Carbuncle is trying to sabotage the article Amirite.com The sockpuppet investigation was also started by him and I have already explained mysel
- There are 2 (TWO) SockPuppet investigations and I am not associated with Carbuncle nor his SockPuppet investigation. Additionally, I am allowed to voice my opinion on any AfD. PeterWesco (talk) 07:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Disrupting AfD
AfD is not the place to air your grievances about a specific editor. I have removed your various personal attacks against Delicious carbuncle (talk · contribs). Before you go and accuse us of ganging up on you, see User talk:Francophonie&Androphilie/Archive/Archive 3#Block. If you have complaints about DC, take them to AN/I or ArbCom. — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) 10:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Craddock1. Please chill out and take a step back for a moment. I have considered blocking you for a bit to stop the disruption you are causing, but I feel a final plea is a better bet for now. On Wikipedia we have an important guideline of "Comment on the content, not the editor". Your very first contribution to that AFD is to attack the nominator, and it has gone downhill from there. All you are really doing is undermining the AFD in a way which will not benefit you. Take a moment to step back, consider how you could marshal an argument to explain how the article meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, and continue with a reasoned explanation in the deletion discussion. Continuing with your current behaviour will end up with you being blocked. --Errant (chat!) 11:22, 31 December 2012 (UTC)