→AP discretionary sanctions alert: new section Tag: contentious topics alert |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> (These expire after 12 months so another reminder is needed.) [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 05:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC) |
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> (These expire after 12 months so another reminder is needed.) [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 05:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC) |
||
"Disruption." That's funny. The truth is "disruption." You people really are living in 1984, aren't you? |
|||
Joe Biden may be the most corrupt person to ever run for office. You people actually impeached Trump for looking into Biden crimes that you now deny. You do not have the intellectual honesty to even admit what you doing. You're a loathsome enemy of everything America stands for. You -- personally. Scum. |
|||
Is Reuters reputable enough, Scum? |
|||
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hunter-biden-ukraine-idUSKBN1WX1P7 [[User:Cpurick|Cpurick]] ([[User talk:Cpurick#top|talk]]) 15:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:43, 26 October 2020
Welcome!
Hello, Cpurick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 16:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Post-1932 politics of the United States
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Drmies (talk) 20:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
October 2020
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Hunter Biden. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Hunter Biden
I noticed your comment at Talk:Hunter Biden (diff) where you made a claim about a living person without providing a reliable source. Do you have any evidence to support that claim? If so, please post it immediately (before making any further edits). If not, please remove it immediately. Note that at Wikipedia, even on a talk page, "evidence" means a reliable source—not one of the many anything-goes websites. I make this request as an uninvolved adminstrator. Johnuniq (talk) 04:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
AP discretionary sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 (These expire after 12 months so another reminder is needed.) Johnuniq (talk) 05:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
"Disruption." That's funny. The truth is "disruption." You people really are living in 1984, aren't you?
Joe Biden may be the most corrupt person to ever run for office. You people actually impeached Trump for looking into Biden crimes that you now deny. You do not have the intellectual honesty to even admit what you doing. You're a loathsome enemy of everything America stands for. You -- personally. Scum.
Is Reuters reputable enough, Scum?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hunter-biden-ukraine-idUSKBN1WX1P7 Cpurick (talk) 15:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)