Counter-revolutionary (talk | contribs) |
Astrotrain (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
Nearly all your edits are marked as minor. You may have got this set as a default in your preferences. Edits should only be marked as minor when they concern things such as spelling, formatting, punctuation, etc, but not if they relate to content in any way. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 22:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
Nearly all your edits are marked as minor. You may have got this set as a default in your preferences. Edits should only be marked as minor when they concern things such as spelling, formatting, punctuation, etc, but not if they relate to content in any way. [[User:Tyrenius|Tyrenius]] 22:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
:You are correct and this is set as default. I shall try to be more careful.--[[User:Couter-revolutionary|Couter-revolutionary]] 01:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
:You are correct and this is set as default. I shall try to be more careful.--[[User:Couter-revolutionary|Couter-revolutionary]] 01:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
==[[Raymond Gilmour]] |
|||
See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Gilmour]]- another AFD for a non notable IRA member [[User:Astrotrain|Astrotrain]] 19:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:50, 9 February 2007
Problem
I am carefully cataloguing User SandyDancer's edits and comments. He is clearly very jaundiced towards any form of conservatism and monarchy etc. There was an appalling User on Wikpedia before called homeontherange (or homey) who is said to have left. But has he? Viewing his comments and similar attacks on the same things I wonder if this is the same person. Once I think I have the time to put together a reasonable case I will make a formal complaint. Chelsea Tory 16:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not homeontherange. If you seriously think I am I suggest you make a checkuser request.
- In the meantime, doing what you are doing is called wikistalking and you probably shouldn't do it.
- For someone with a username like yours, who announced that Wikipedia needs "a Real Conservative policeman" on his user page, you have a cheek suggesting others have a biased agenda. Your personal political views do not represent a neutral point of view - so when someone edits an article in a way you don't like, you can't just accuse them of being on some sort of mission, especially when you yourself are on one by your own admission. --SandyDancer 23:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not use my Talk page for debate which isn't addressed to you. You seemed to go through a period of following my edits, surely this was "Wiki-stalking".--Couter-revolutionary 23:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- No, it wasn't. I decided that you were in the process of editing lots of articles about deposed monarchs in a way I believed to be incorrect and to be representative of your own point of view rather than neutral fact. That isn't Wikistalking.
- Also please note you don't own this talk page and I am perfectly entitled to be part of this - or any - discussion on Wikipedia. --SandyDancer 00:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, you've made that comment before. It is, however, polite to only enter into conversations of which you can be helpful and/or are addressed to you. There is no point to verbose debate. I think that is all I have to say on the matter.--Couter-revolutionary 12:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think I am entitled to participate in a conversation about me, where allegations of misconduct and personal attacks have been made. --SandyDancer 13:18, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, you've made that comment before. It is, however, polite to only enter into conversations of which you can be helpful and/or are addressed to you. There is no point to verbose debate. I think that is all I have to say on the matter.--Couter-revolutionary 12:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not use my Talk page for debate which isn't addressed to you. You seemed to go through a period of following my edits, surely this was "Wiki-stalking".--Couter-revolutionary 23:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Everyone should bear in mind Wikipedia:Harassment. I think prolonging this exchange probably doesn't serve a useful purpose. Charles Matthews 16:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- I quite agree, SandyDancer was not being "harassed", nothing has even been directed at him. This conversation was intended to be between ChelseaTory and myself, granted this is impossible on Wikipedia.--Couter-revolutionary 16:18, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
I actually think that Sandy Dancer is both arrogant and dictatorial. Why should my User name be offensive? Britain has had eminent Tories for centuries. The whole problem with the Left is that because they are so (obviously) biased they wish to create an illusion of balance by accusing those not in their camp of the same thing. I believe that I am unbiased. At least I have been honest about myself, and given his atrocious edits which are thinly veiled attacks in themselves, more honest than he. Chelsea Tory 11:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Can you even make one post on a talk page without peppering it with numerous personal attacks? I am growing tired of your persistent pattern of abuse and harassment, principally aimed at me it would seem. I will notify you before I seek administrative censure or sanction for your behaviour, but note that unless you stop doing this I will have to do so. --SandyDancer 12:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Counter-revolutionary! I've just started a poll about Category:British royal titles templates, and would really value your input - please do have your say! Cheers, – DBD does... 13:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello
A Happy New Year to you, counter-revolutionary. I see that User:SandyDancer has "retired" from Wikipedia. Possibly I (and doubtless others) were getting a bit too close to identifying him as a sock-puppet. Anyway, I hope you are still soldiering on. I have been very busy with my family over Christmas and New Year (not to mention work!), as well as having my parents to stay, so I have have not been able to find the time to edit etc. Every good wish. Chelsea Tory 19:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Regicide
Please see Talk:Regicide#Savang Vatthana --Philip Baird Shearer 15:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Assassination
I think this word is not POV at all. Strictly factual. People on both sides have been assassinated by people on the other side. Fact. - Kittybrewster 23:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Do not remove referenced material, it is considered vandalism - if it is not reinserted than I will report you.--Vintagekits 00:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- There are folks who say "Never argue with st*p*d people; there is no point". Your articles are excellent and much appreciated. - Kittybrewster 17:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Please remember WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA--Vintagekits 17:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- There are folks who say "Never argue with st*p*d people; there is no point". Your articles are excellent and much appreciated. - Kittybrewster 17:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Baron Alexis de Rédé
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Baron Alexis de Rédé, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Baron Alexis de Rédé. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. --Vintagekits 01:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Seen this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Vintagekits
- Interesting? Chelsea Tory 11:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Please improve Arbuthnot Road. - Kittybrewster 11:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can
I have removed material that is in violation of these policies. It is advisable not to even give the appearance of endorsing such attacks. Tyrenius 20:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- What have I done to offend the biographies of living persons or to make a personal attack... I was merely hypothesising over the action to take against a user who continually "stalks" my edits. --Couter-revolutionary 20:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's been established that wikipedia editors also benefit from this policy, as they are living persons. I recommend deleting posts from your talk page if they are like the one in question, and certainly not giving the appearance of endorsing it. You have to be careful about accusations of stalking, i.e. harrassment, to differentiate between a legitimate interest in a subject, and an interest purely in the editor for the sake of causing him trouble. The latter is usually apparent when the editor goes to a completely different subject area and still finds himself being pursued. This makes evidence. Tyrenius 22:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Greetings
I have logged onto WP for the first time in ages, and have left a couple of talk comments for ChelseaTory and thought I'd do the same for you. As you know I have retired from WP, and have no regrets about doing so. All the bickering got tiresome. However with the benefit of hindsight, I now see that despite differences over editing style, you are actually a net contributor to this project, far more than others. So for creating all the articles listed on your user page and remaining interested in doing so despite all the arguments, I SandyDancer award you:
Best wishes for the future and farewell. --SandyDancer 21:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Minor edits
Nearly all your edits are marked as minor. You may have got this set as a default in your preferences. Edits should only be marked as minor when they concern things such as spelling, formatting, punctuation, etc, but not if they relate to content in any way. Tyrenius 22:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct and this is set as default. I shall try to be more careful.--Couter-revolutionary 01:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Gilmour- another AFD for a non notable IRA member Astrotrain 19:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)