Southasianhistorian8 (talk | contribs) |
170.170.200.154 (talk) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
::FYI, these barrage of IPs/proxies on your talk page are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/HaughtonBrit/Archive HaughtonBrit] who is continuing his harassment campaign against me through proxies. Since his account {{noping|Ralx888}} was banned, HaughtonBrit has been incessantly hampering my edits either logged out or through sock accounts like {{noping|Rivanawam}}, {{noping|Jaagit}}, {{noping|Elifanta23}} and Ralx888 along with IPs such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1016:B000:0:0:0:0:0/42] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:547:B03:0:0:0:0:0/49]. Now he is using proxies-[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ivanvector&oldid=1176579373#Curious_case_of_Wrythemann] + [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Courcelles&oldid=1177635251#could_be_something_to_look_into?] + [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Neutrality#Curious] (trying to get me blocked by saying Wrythemann is my sock) + [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1140#IP_sockpuppetry/_Long_term_abuse_by_HaughtonBrit] and this 205* IP here. (The 199 and 192* IP is his confirmed sock btw as per his SPI archives). This is really quite disturbing behaviour. |
::FYI, these barrage of IPs/proxies on your talk page are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/HaughtonBrit/Archive HaughtonBrit] who is continuing his harassment campaign against me through proxies. Since his account {{noping|Ralx888}} was banned, HaughtonBrit has been incessantly hampering my edits either logged out or through sock accounts like {{noping|Rivanawam}}, {{noping|Jaagit}}, {{noping|Elifanta23}} and Ralx888 along with IPs such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1016:B000:0:0:0:0:0/42] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:547:B03:0:0:0:0:0/49]. Now he is using proxies-[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ivanvector&oldid=1176579373#Curious_case_of_Wrythemann] + [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Courcelles&oldid=1177635251#could_be_something_to_look_into?] + [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Neutrality#Curious] (trying to get me blocked by saying Wrythemann is my sock) + [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1140#IP_sockpuppetry/_Long_term_abuse_by_HaughtonBrit] and this 205* IP here. (The 199 and 192* IP is his confirmed sock btw as per his SPI archives). This is really quite disturbing behaviour. |
||
::Recently, this 65* IP/proxy showed up [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Patti&action=history] pushing the same religious chest thumping edits as HaughtonBrit, also editing the same page that the PrinceofRoblox sock did-[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abhinandan_Varthaman&action=history] very strongly indicating this is HaughtonBrit . The IP is displaying very simliar behaviour as UnbiasedSN (whom I belive is HB's puppet account) who also made disruptive POV edits to hamper me-[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Kartarpur&action=history] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Rahon_(1710)&diff=prev&oldid=1179403488] with the same exact messages on my talk page-[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suthasianhistorian8&diff=prev&oldid=1178819455] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suthasianhistorian8&diff=prev&oldid=1180883246], essentially copy pasting the same message I left on their talk page. [[User:Suthasianhistorian8|Southasianhistorian8]] ([[User talk:Suthasianhistorian8|talk]]) 03:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC) |
::Recently, this 65* IP/proxy showed up [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Patti&action=history] pushing the same religious chest thumping edits as HaughtonBrit, also editing the same page that the PrinceofRoblox sock did-[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abhinandan_Varthaman&action=history] very strongly indicating this is HaughtonBrit . The IP is displaying very simliar behaviour as UnbiasedSN (whom I belive is HB's puppet account) who also made disruptive POV edits to hamper me-[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Kartarpur&action=history] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Rahon_(1710)&diff=prev&oldid=1179403488] with the same exact messages on my talk page-[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suthasianhistorian8&diff=prev&oldid=1178819455] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suthasianhistorian8&diff=prev&oldid=1180883246], essentially copy pasting the same message I left on their talk page. [[User:Suthasianhistorian8|Southasianhistorian8]] ([[User talk:Suthasianhistorian8|talk]]) 03:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
What is happening here is that Suthasianhistorian8 is upset that socks of Prince of Roblox keeps getting caught and blocked and trying to tie me to something to just prevent any more socks of Prince of Roblox from getting blocked. I have been editing wikipedia since last 12 years and my IP has always been in good standing. I suspected Suthasianhistorian8 to be sock or say having connection with the socks of Prince of Roblox such as Wrythemann where both their edits overlapped [https://interaction-timeline.toolforge.org/?wiki=enwiki&user=Suthasianhistorian8&user=Wrythemann] and [https://sigma.toolforge.org/editorinteract.py?users=Suthasianhistorian8&users=Wrythemann&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki]. After Wrythemann was blocked, new sock emerged NeutralClaims who too was found to be sock of Prince of ROblox but what is interesting here is that NeutralClaims's very first edit was on Suthasianhistorian8's talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suthasianhistorian8&diff=prev&oldid=1180371038]. Its like an attempt to prove they both have no links to one another. Why would a sock of Prince of Roblox out of all the users on Wikipedia, try to connect with Suthasianhistorian8? Another attempt to separate from Prince of Roblox is where IP65 makes changes to same page that NeutralClaims did [[Abhinandan Varthaman]] and somehow Suthasianhistorian8 now recognizes this IP65 as sock of Prince of Roblox? Come to find out Suthasianhistorian8 himself had been blocked for having a sock farm before his probation completed. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Suthasianhistorian8/Archive]. Could it be that connection between Prince of Roblox and Suthasianhistorian8 was missed? There is clear indication of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry here. |
|||
== Indefinitely semi-protected pages needing prior PC settings reset == |
== Indefinitely semi-protected pages needing prior PC settings reset == |
Revision as of 13:10, 20 October 2023
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Promotional socks/meat
I just blocked Ge0ffrey de smet for a personal attack at WP:ANI (reverted by another user). Ge0ffrey is openly promoting OptaPlanner, his software, and related products. It also looks like Ge0ffrey created (sock) or recruited (meat) Jdmbs to help (among other things, Ge0ffrey uses Jdmbs's sandbox). I'm inclined to block both indefinitely, but I thought it might be good to know beforehand whether they are socks or meat.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Confirmed as sockpuppets. I've blocked them both. Courcelles (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Any reason you didn't tag the master?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- No, I was actually still considering if the main article needed to go through AFD when I got the new message email. Courcelles (talk) 13:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong beat me to nominating it. If it were about an eligible subject, I could see an A7, but AFD it has to be. Tagged the master now. Courcelles (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- That's what you get when you go look at your e-mail.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- EMail makes my wrist buzz ever since I got this "smart" watch that thinks I'm talking to it all the time... makes it harder to ignore! Courcelles (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- That's what you get when you go look at your e-mail.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong beat me to nominating it. If it were about an eligible subject, I could see an A7, but AFD it has to be. Tagged the master now. Courcelles (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- No, I was actually still considering if the main article needed to go through AFD when I got the new message email. Courcelles (talk) 13:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Any reason you didn't tag the master?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Do you have a moment to take look, please? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- GS and I were looking at the same time. Handled. Courcelles (talk) 18:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
😊 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Unusual result of block evasion
I don't know if this happens much, but an article that was in draft form when you blocked the editor just made it through AfC. It looks likely that they continued editing it as an IP after the block, to bring it to the status in which it was approved. You had blocked the editor some days after this ANI thread that I started.
Just thought you might want to know. I can't say for sure whether or not they created a new account after the block; there's a low signal-to-noise ratio in the pageant articles. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- GS/PAGEANT applies, so semied. Not seeing much else to do at this point. Courcelles (talk) 18:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of administrative tools
A while ago you protected Port Blair. You did this at the behest of a user who had falsely described obviously good edits as vandalism. This user in fact has a long history of making false accusations of vandalism when they have merely decided on a whim that they don't like a certain edit. You protected the article in a poor state, rewarding the disruptive editor for their harmful behaviour. You should remove the protection and restore the improvements that were made. 185.104.136.31 (talk) 06:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- No. Courcelles (talk) 14:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Please look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jad Krimeed
Latest reported named sock is prolific. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not seeing any sleepers, for the record. Courcelles (talk) 13:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Prince of Roblox
You blocked Wrythemann [1] and now the New user NeutralClaims [2], account created on 10 October 2023 is suspiciously one of the many socks of Prince of Roblox [3] with similar editing patterns which doesn't indicate this new user to be an "actual" new user. 205.182.133.63 (talk) 13:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Confirmed. Blocked and tagged. Courcelles (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- FYI, these barrage of IPs/proxies on your talk page are HaughtonBrit who is continuing his harassment campaign against me through proxies. Since his account Ralx888 was banned, HaughtonBrit has been incessantly hampering my edits either logged out or through sock accounts like Rivanawam, Jaagit, Elifanta23 and Ralx888 along with IPs such as [4] and [5]. Now he is using proxies-[6] + [7] + [8] (trying to get me blocked by saying Wrythemann is my sock) + [9] and this 205* IP here. (The 199 and 192* IP is his confirmed sock btw as per his SPI archives). This is really quite disturbing behaviour.
- Recently, this 65* IP/proxy showed up [10] pushing the same religious chest thumping edits as HaughtonBrit, also editing the same page that the PrinceofRoblox sock did-[11] very strongly indicating this is HaughtonBrit . The IP is displaying very simliar behaviour as UnbiasedSN (whom I belive is HB's puppet account) who also made disruptive POV edits to hamper me-[12] and [13] with the same exact messages on my talk page-[14] and [15], essentially copy pasting the same message I left on their talk page. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 03:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
What is happening here is that Suthasianhistorian8 is upset that socks of Prince of Roblox keeps getting caught and blocked and trying to tie me to something to just prevent any more socks of Prince of Roblox from getting blocked. I have been editing wikipedia since last 12 years and my IP has always been in good standing. I suspected Suthasianhistorian8 to be sock or say having connection with the socks of Prince of Roblox such as Wrythemann where both their edits overlapped [16] and [17]. After Wrythemann was blocked, new sock emerged NeutralClaims who too was found to be sock of Prince of ROblox but what is interesting here is that NeutralClaims's very first edit was on Suthasianhistorian8's talk page [18]. Its like an attempt to prove they both have no links to one another. Why would a sock of Prince of Roblox out of all the users on Wikipedia, try to connect with Suthasianhistorian8? Another attempt to separate from Prince of Roblox is where IP65 makes changes to same page that NeutralClaims did Abhinandan Varthaman and somehow Suthasianhistorian8 now recognizes this IP65 as sock of Prince of Roblox? Come to find out Suthasianhistorian8 himself had been blocked for having a sock farm before his probation completed. [19]. Could it be that connection between Prince of Roblox and Suthasianhistorian8 was missed? There is clear indication of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry here.
Indefinitely semi-protected pages needing prior PC settings reset
Greetings, the following pages have all been indefinitely semi-protected but for whatever reason the prior PC settings were never reset:
- Srinivasa Ramanujan
- Pauline Hanson
- Wilfred Owen
- Orange juice
- Fly
- Battle of Stamford Bridge
- Toronto Raptors
- Rolf Harris
- Childhood (redirect page)
- Laptop
- Mistake
- List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network
- Malcolm Turnbull
- Indian Air Force
- Mohanlal
- Naruto Uzumaki
Can you please take care of this for all these pages? Thanks. Ranstid (talk) 13:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- All fixed. Courcelles (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed?
Hey, can you confirm that Mo Mazen is a sock of Ottomanor? I would like to increase the block duration of Ottomanor (not sure precisely how much yet), but just in case it's a joe-job or freakish coincidence... Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Technically?
Unrelated. And I'm surprised, too. Courcelles (talk) 16:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Good thing I checked first...so to speak. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was sure they'd be the same looking at the exact revert... but there's nothing technically there. Different countries, etc... Courcelles (talk) 16:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Good thing I checked first...so to speak. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Stranger than fiction
TheMaster077 is an odd new (October 10) account. Started by playing in their sandbox (did some more pointless sandbox editing most recently), then after some intervening article edits filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Musicfan122 accusing two alternative accounts (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/QuestFour for more) of being socks of a blocked sock of another master. I've requested a clerk to move the report. In reviewing the edits, I saw some history of socking on the articles they edited, but nothing convinced me behaviorally. Any thoughts?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Confirmed and blocked, and filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aaron106 for the record. Courcelles (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- That was one of the masters I thought of. I deleted the SPI filed by the account. Any reason not to tag and close the report you filed for the record?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Berceuse my class decided pandemonium was the correct way to come back into the room? (I.e. done now that I can sit down again.) Courcelles (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- I assume you mean because, but berceuse is an amusing extended French typo. Is this that 12-week thing you mentioned in late September? You're the teacher? Did you ever watch Downton Abbey? The butler/footman Molesley takes up teaching in middle age and his first class devolves into chaos. Happy ending, though.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Berceuse my class decided pandemonium was the correct way to come back into the room? (I.e. done now that I can sit down again.) Courcelles (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- That was one of the masters I thought of. I deleted the SPI filed by the account. Any reason not to tag and close the report you filed for the record?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)