Tag: Undo |
→Savage (song): new section |
||
Line 1,353: | Line 1,353: | ||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC) |
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
== [[Savage (song)]] == |
|||
Hey! Can I ask why you keep making disruptive edits to the Savage article? Like I get that you're a big Cardi B fan (as am I) but I'm not sure why repeatedly moving material into the wrong subsections or removing material from another female rapper's article helps your cause. Thank you [[User:Bgkc4444|Bgkc4444]] ([[User talk:Bgkc4444|talk]]) 16:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Bgkc4444 |
Revision as of 16:33, 3 September 2020
Hi would like to communicate with cornerstone — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.205.112.193 (talk) 22:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- You should post at the bottom. Not at the top. 115.164.222.232 (talk) 03:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Please help!
Look the page List of awards and nominations received by Missy Elliott, the user Jeanpierre660/Jeanpierre1844 is editing the page with bad sources and fake numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.117.169.248 (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks
Hello friend, I read completely the article of The Boombox and you are right. This is a survey, I regret my stubbornness. Best regards! --Mixitnew (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Mixitnew
Hey bud!
Thanks for creating M-Train's awards and nominations page. I polished this one tonight. If there are no notability concerns, It may be ready for FL... :) MaranoFan (talk) 18:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- What do you think about the article? MaranoFan (talk) 07:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- OK so I wont be editing for a few weeks since I have my ecxams. I just wanted to let you know that you should send the list for FL, (well, if you want to.).... :) MaranoFan (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's too soon. She only has five awards and that's make the article a little weak. I would wait. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- OK so I wont be editing for a few weeks since I have my ecxams. I just wanted to let you know that you should send the list for FL, (well, if you want to.).... :) MaranoFan (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
I award you this barnstar for all the award-related lists/events you've worked on, especially for Justin Timberlake and your expansions to his article. Keep it up! Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC) |
how are you bruhhhhh
Removing Ariana Grande's parents
Hi I noticed that you removed Ariana Grande's parents from the Ariana Grande page. You said they weren't notable, but I know her mom works as her manager and Ariana Grande has mentioned quite a fews time about her and her father so people would probably like to know that. I'll put the edits back again but if you want to remove them again please talk to me and let me know why!
Thank you! Stephilippou (talk) 05:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Unless their parents are Celebrities or notable for the public, they shouldn't be there. See Template:Infobox_person#Parameters. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 08:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding!
- Stephilippou (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Timberlake Tha Fashion Killa
Hey. I'm Justin Timberlake fan and i found some useful links if you would like to add info about his fashion style in his article.
- DeLeon, Jian. "JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE'S 10 BEST STYLE MOVES OF 2013". GQ. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
- Phili, Stelios. "6 STYLE MOVES TO STEAL FROM JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE". GQ. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
- Nygaard, Sandra (February 24, 2011). "Justin Timberlake: Style Power". Men's Health. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
- Carreon, Blue (April 2, 2013). "10 Things To Learn From Justin Timberlake's Makeover". Forbes. Retrieved October 19, 2015.
- Cool, I'll take a look. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
... I would like to thank you for all the contributions and maintenance you give into the article. ;) — Tom(T2ME) 18:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
5sos
Hi! I just wanted to let you know a little error on the 5 seconds of summer page. It states that the boys went on the "on the road again" tour with one direction when they actually didn't. If you wanted to change it that would be great. Thanks! Katesmarsbar (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- According to http://www.webcitation.org/6XTT5XsBm they performed at the Saitama Super Arena as opening act. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
To Pimp A Butterfly revision
Why did you undo the addition of mastering engineer under the production heading? It is a valid addition. Grundman's has mastered some of the world's greatest music, including Michael Jackson's Thriller. It's worth noting. Mastering engineers are an integral part of the production of an album. add Bozzi to the personnel heading if you think it's more appropriate. He's listed on the good kid mad city page--- Lamar and his team including sounwave, Derek Ali, Thudercat, etc spent many hours making additions to to pimp a butterfly at grundman's studio with Bozzi Chemmech99 (talk) 02:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Check "Personnel" section first, official credits.Btw, you deleted the critical reception charts. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)o- My bad, I added Mike Bozzi on "Personnel" section, the Grammys credit him. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Sales, streaming
But you know that if RIAA change the certification's mechanism, is bc something happened. The streams are increasing, and the article says "sales" not "pure sales", RIAA count 100 streams in the US as a sale, not excuse your hatred by Fifth Harmony on sales, lol. Worth It sell 3M WITH STREAMS!!! You don't want to see the article extinct right, because your pure sales will end, lol!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucas11925 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- You are just assuming that. Those are streaming points, sales here are pure sales. "3x certication omg it sold 3 million!!!!" please, dont be that guy. Until you find a source stating "Worth It" has sold 3 million in the US (the chart you have edited is about the country, not WW like that tweet you showed) it will be removed. Edit: Lucas11925, I added a note there for "Worth It" multiplatinum-certification. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: @Lucas11925: this is an ongoing problem with this article which has troubled me for months: in short, a lack of actual sales figures for virtually all records means it is impossible to make any accurate lists of best-selling girl group records, which really makes this article redundant.
- If you read through the RfC discussion on the talk page you can see my misgivings - we felt the only way to salvage the article was to use certification levels, so the argument of Lucas11925 and Musicstan is valid: if we remove "Worth It" we have to remove virtually the whole article, because the sections for Australia, France, Germany, Canada, etc. are all implied sales based on certification levels. Japan and South Korea have sales figures, but these are mostly unverified... the Korean figures are mostly sourced from a French(!) blog. The UK figures are just about the only officially sourced ones, but even these are incomplete - for example, I can work out from OCC figures that both "Yes Sir I Can Boogie" and "Frankie" have sold in excess of 640,000 copies, so should be included on the UK singles list. But as I don't know exactly how many, or have a source, they have been excluded from the table.
- There has been an attempt before to delete this article, in 2011: if it got put up for AfD again I wouldn't oppose it. Richard3120 (talk) 09:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Just read that, Richard3120, so he has a point. But since 2013 streaming points have been included in certifications. I guess pre-2013 all were pure-sales. Don't Cha is only platinum, but has sold 3 million in the US. Confusing. Or maybe it can be merged to "Girl groups" article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- The explanation behind "Don't Cha" can be found in the article used as the source for the 3M sales: it says it sold 3M on downloads in addition to a single platinum certification for old-fashioned physical sales. Which means the total sales should be 4M, not 3M. But as the person quoting those figures is Cee Lo Green, the song's co-writer, that's not really a verifiable source. And so we're back to the problem of sourcing verifiable sales figures: we can't do this for the Pussycat Dolls and we can't do this for Fifth Harmony, and we can't do it for most singles. So this is why we went with implied sales from certifications. But this is also problematic as (1) certifications are for shipments, not actual sales, (2) apart from the US and UK few countries had certifications before the 1980s, so the tables are heavily skewed towards the last twenty years, (3) it wasn't important for record companies in the past to apply for certifications, so many records from the 1950s, 60s and 70s have no certifications despite theoretically qualifying for them (see the lack of certified Supremes records in the US, or the single platinum certification for Bridge over Troubled Water in the UK, despite being one of the top 20 all-time best-selling albums in that country). The whole article is a minefield, really. Richard3120 (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Just read that, Richard3120, so he has a point. But since 2013 streaming points have been included in certifications. I guess pre-2013 all were pure-sales. Don't Cha is only platinum, but has sold 3 million in the US. Confusing. Or maybe it can be merged to "Girl groups" article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Reverts on Drake articles
Thank you for those reverts. Edits were against consensus, and had a "I know better than the sources attitude". They were disruptive as well, the editor took it to the talk page and continued. Thanks for the help. I was already at three reverts, so I didn't dare revert again. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Year-end charts
Year-end charts are missing in This Summer's Gonna Hurt like a Motherfucker. Add it please.
- Because it didn't chart in any Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Anti Critical Reception
Hi Corner! Are you taking a full responsibility over the section? If you do, I have some tips for you: 1) If you want to build a successful CR section take a look at the previous critical receptions on Good Girl Gone Bad, Rated R or Loud (those sections are looking pretty good). 2) The first paragraph should contain the positive reviews, then the others mixed and the end negative. 3) I am gonna add some reviews in the infobox you can use it. I really appreciate the work. — Tom(T2ME) 19:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Tomica Ok! most of the reviews are mixed so far. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, but I think Spin and Toronto Sun should be first, then the rest. — Tom(T2ME) 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Spin has seven editors with different opinons in the article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, but I think Spin and Toronto Sun should be first, then the rest. — Tom(T2ME) 19:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 1 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Kendrick Lamar discography page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Writers for Pillow Talk
Hi would you be able to edit the Pillow Talk page to amend the writers info! There are only 3 registers writers. Zayn , Michael , and Anthony. I am a representative from Sony ATV music Publishing and we have two of the writers ATVformusic (talk) 17:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- We still need a Reliable source, published on internet. Otherwise, it would be original research. Please, if the credits can be published somewhere (reliable) so we just link, it would be helpful. There is not source for the writers yet. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)I will try and get a label copy upladed thank you for doing that
- ATVformusic https://www.ascap.com/Home/ace-title-search/index.aspx , search Pillowtalk. 5 writers. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please can you revert the writers back to the 5 as there is no evidence suggesting there are only 3 writers. ASCAP and PRS have confirmed the 5 writers that are registered.
Thank you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Hi! Just wanted to thank you with the original barnstar for all your great work on Zayn articles! :) |
Upcoming Meghan articles
Would you like to help me expand Draft:Thank You (Meghan Trainor album) and Draft:No (Meghan Trainor song)?--MaranoFan (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- sure! Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
IKWYDLS
Hey, I tried playing smart with my little knowledge of coding and accidentally almost messed up IKWYDLS's page. Would you mind adding the Platinum certification? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoriagomezv (talk • contribs) 13:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Victoriagomezv But is not on RIAA's website yet riaa.com/gold-platinum/ , where did you read that? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
It was announced on a press release from Island Records regarding Shawn's world tour. Doesn't RIAA update once a week? It should be up soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoriagomezv (talk • contribs) 17:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Here it is: http://www.riaa.com/gold-platinum/?tab_active=default-award&ar=SHAWN+MENDES&ti=I+KNOW+WHAT+YOU+DID+LAST+SUMMER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.6.21.174 (talk) 16:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Finally, gotta update Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Gold in Denmark: https://twitter.com/CamilaStats/status/712671764174794753 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.14.177.57 (talk) 16:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Credit
Label copy source: http://www.nowmusic.com/now-93-info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.61.25 (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
ASCAP and PRS have confirmed there are 5 writers on the song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.59.110 (talk) 23:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
I will contact ASCAP Monday for the confirmations!! Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATVformusic (talk • contribs) 01:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
We publish two of the writers on this song! We have the label copy also!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ATVformusic (talk • contribs) 00:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- ATVformusic That should be on the internet, so we can cite the source. Otherwise, ASCAP remains the main source. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
They are credited but not writers!! Thank you ATVformusic (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- ATVformusic Do you a source (reliable publication) that proves otherwise? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
The website is only available in US, Australia and New Zealand, but the other countries cannot view it. Is a reliable source? 123.136.111.147 (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- For what exactly? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Zacharylernersin
You deleted the reviews that I put under TLOP because you said that they weren't "music publications", but they're just as much music publications as the NYT is!!
Complex and Noisey are completely legitimate as just music publications, and the person who wrote the Noisey review also writes for Pitchfork
All the other reviews are from legitimate websites/magazines that have been known to write reviews all the time, idk why they shouldn't be added
the GQ review is even referenced in the Composition portion of the page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacharylernersin (talk • contribs) 00:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Zacharylernersin: you wrote an entire paragraph for each review. Please, check Metacritic for "acclaim" and "positive reviews", they list each review they have considered. If you already have like 20 relevant reviews, why would you add more (specially from those magazines)? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey there. Could you upload the artwork for "Work from Home"? It's here [1]. --Eurofan88 (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- k, I will do it later Cornerstonepicker (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Wrong number on awards received by Eminem
Hi and thanks for your edit but you told me to tell you what article have a wrong number to fix it. Well if you go to List of awards and nominations received by Michael Jackson, you will find that he received 785+ awards. But when I checked the HTML code (1) (2) (3) (4) there was only 363 awards (I am 99% sure about that). Even List of awards and nominations received by Justin Bieber you will find that he received 136 awards. But when I checked the HTML code (1) (2) (3) (4) there was only 69 awards (I am 99% sure about that). And I am sure that there is more pages that have the same thing, what I am trying tell you is not that all artists have a wrong number on their pages but is the amount of received awards by Eminem before you edit it (346) is probably right. Maybe 346 is the actual amount of awards received by Eminem but the author did not mention all the awards, Maybe 785+ is the actual amount of awards received by Michael Jackson but the author did not mention all the awards, Maybe 136 is the actual amount of awards received by Justin Bieber but the author did not mention all the awards. So I think it is a good idea to change the number back to 346 on Eminem's page. And yes I'm an Eminem fan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliasyoussef47 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Eliasyoussef47: You can't just show a list of 120 awards and then put the artist has won "346" awards without proving it. Not even with a (reliable) source. Remember, WP only lists notable awards per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I fixed MJ numbers; and Bieber used "rowspan=4 {{won}}" when he wins four awards in a row, so counting it with f3 won't help, it has to be counted manually. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
It is eligible for WP:DYK. But only till tomorrow. If you want, please nominate it now. I don't have the time. You can use [2] as an example.--MaranoFan (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: Am I late? Can't think of a hook for Thank you Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Just create it with any hook you want. Alt hooks can be added.--MaranoFan (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: done check Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
"Kiyanu Kim" / "KIM DAVID KYUNGIL"
I think that someone hacked into music publishing website as a songwriter "KIM DAVID KYUNGIL" [3]. However in Complex magazine: " "Wrecking Ball"—a team of five songwriters did: Lukasz Gottwald, Maureen Anne McDonald, Stephan Moccio, Sacha Skarbek, and Henry Russell Walter."
123.136.106.23 (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Check Bangerz booklet, (IMO) BMI and ASCAP are not 100% reliable. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your continuous work to keep Meghan Trainor articles up to par. MaranoFan (talk) 08:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC) |
A page you started (Dangerous Woman (album)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dangerous Woman (album), Cornerstonepicker!
Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I enjoyed reading the article on the upcoming album Dangerous Woman by Ariana Grande. Very nicely done.
To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Please help
Please help me listing "Focus" as a single from Dangerous Woman. I have a reliable source (http://www.fuse.tv/2016/03/ariana-grande-new-album-complete-guide), but there is an anonymous user keeps reverting my edits. Please help me! Thx. U990467 (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
It keeps reverting my edits on Dangerous Woman (album) with no reason. Please help!!(talk) 18:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- @U990467: comment on the Talk page to avoid WP:EDITWAR Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- @U990467: don't forget your point of view would be a better comment. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 3rd iHeartRadio Music Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NCAA March Madness. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Impact section for "Anti"
Why no student newspapers?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobpotash (talk • contribs) 17:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Jacobpotash: because those aren't professional publications per WP:MUSIC/SOURCES. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
FAC: Maxinquaye
Hi there. Since you're an active contributor to music articles on Wikipedia, would you be interested in offering a review or comment at my FAC for the article Maxinquaye? Dan56 (talk) 17:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Writing credits on See You Again (Wiz Khalifa song)
Since additional songwriters have been registered but misplaced on database per WP:Songs 123.136.107.177 (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Thank You (Meghan Trainor album)
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IHeartRadio Music Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
You have been invited to join the Meghan Trainor WikiProject, a WikiProject on the English Wikipedia dedicated to improving articles and lists related to Meghan Trainor. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add your name to the list of participants. Thank You. |
Welcome!
Welcome to the Meghan Trainor WikiProject! We are very pleased to have your help with the project. If you have not done so yet, it is strongly recommended that you add all the Meghan Trainor pages to your watchlist. If you have any inquiries regarding the project, or any articles relating to Meghan Trainor, please direct them to the project's talk page. Alternately, you could also bring up a discussion on the article's own talk page, or message a fellow participant, but we would prefer all participants engaging on the project's own talk page. If you find yourself inactive with the project for an extended period of time, feel free to remove yourself, or just add yourself to the inactive participants section. Thank you and happy editing! |
Great work on Fifth Harmony
You're doing a nice job making Fifth Harmony's article into a well written article rather than a fan information page, which is easy that it gets since it's basically only fans willing to edit its page. Keep up the good work // Psemmler (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Psemmler: thanks! tho I may reach 3RR in order to stop some fan and his messy edits. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Lemonade
Hi, why are you reverting my edits on Lemonade? I provided a source, so unless you can provide a source proving my statement to be false, I don't see why you are removing it. I updated it just now, with another source claiming it could be just a 48-hour Tidal-exclusive, so it is more neutral. 73.81.159.74 (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Great: that's how you add information. When is not confirmed, cite the source there. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 03:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Dangerous Woman
Why did you revert my edits on "Dangerous Woman"? The page says the song was praised, and all of the reviews are positive. Do people have a thing against Ariana because of "Focus"? Like, I don't get it. It clearly received acclaim. 166.170.34.148 (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Please, read WP:ORIGINALSYN. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Positive reviews are not equal to praise, or acclaim. See the dictionary for clarification. Toddst1 (talk) 21:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
When has a song page on Wikipedia ever had a source specifically say "This song received acclaim", or something like that? That is bull. 166.170.34.148 (talk) 21:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Also, the page says "Critics praised...", so it WAS praised. Stop being so pressed about this. You guys are so stubborn. 166.170.34.148 (talk) 21:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- I use the "best songs of the year" lists for that. Btw, "Critics praised" shouldn't be like that. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK
Please see my comments at Template:Did you know nominations/Can't Stop the Feeling Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS: Is it ok to replace one of them? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. Any hooks used must be supported within article body and adequately referenced without any copyright violations or close paraphrasing. Provide new hooks on that page or be sure the ones already given are sufficiently supported with a mention in the article itself. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Can't Stop the Feeling!
On 23 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Can't Stop the Feeling!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that that Justin Timberlake's "Can't Stop the Feeling!" became the 26th song in history to debut at No. 1 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Can't Stop the Feeling!. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Can't Stop the Feeling!), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Taylor Swift's "Legacy" section topic
Hi! Just wanna inform you that I deleted your reply regarding Taylor's musical influence to other artists specifically Troye Sivan and Camila Cabello. You reasoned out that they were just being fans and so I researched more about it and I found solid evidences that Taylor Swift is one of their musical influence. Here you can check them out:
Thanks! Mat 1997 (talk) 14:30, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Mat 1997: Yeah, you didn't have to delete it. Just reply showing the reasons. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello
Hi~ Can you review Ariana Grande discography? This list is a current featured list candidate. I think it meets the criteria and should be a featured list. If you are willing to review the list, you can click here. Thank you. --U990467 (talk) 12:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi U990467, as other editor commented there, I think it should go through WP:PRG (the place for feedback) first before FL. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
List of songs recorded by Justin Timberlake
The new format for this page and the deleting of songs and featured artists left and right... *sigh* Where should I begin...? Bryan McLaude (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Bryan McLaude: just like Featured-Article List of songs recorded by Katy Perry. what songs did I delete? Cornerstonepicker (talk)
The format is pretty much fine really. I think I just liked the previous format as it was, so I found the change a bit unexpected but it still gets the job done and your making sure the information is being presented accurately and as is. I also have to thank you for your suggestions regarding how to add the additional vocal artists on the 'Justified' album tracks in like a Notes section. As for the deleted song, it was "Where Is The Love?" by The Black Eyed Peas, but I know since Justin is not officially credited I guess the song can't be officially considered his, despite his featured vocals. That's alright though. Bryan McLaude (talk) 05:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Bryan McLaude: Yeah, he was nominated for a Grammy as a vocalist for the song, but he wasn't credited when it charted, on the album tracklist or elsewhere. Btw, I moved the uncredited stuff to notes already, if you could find a source to support it would be ready. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Justified Notes section
Just checked out the Notes section you did for the additional vocal artists; very good job. I like it much better and presents the information just as the official release did. Bryan McLaude (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Drake revision
Why are you repeatedly reverting the edits I have made on the Drake page? I have provided sources and list information primarily from a neutral stance, without violating any Wikipedia guideline. What is the reasoning? PsychopathicAssassin (talk) 19:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- @PsychopathicAssassin: I have explained why several times, even in your Talk page, which you ignored and continued with disruptive edits and non-sense edit summary. With two sources of positive reviews you can't say "critical success" or "widespread success" (WP:SYN), the feuds you "sourced" are not encyclopedic (WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and was already removed weeks ago per Discussion). Among others. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: The usage of "critical success" and "widespread success" was only written due to articles like Kanye West, (a good article-certified article, might I add) using the language on positive reviews with NO sources prevalent in the top of the page. I had also improved the references about the feuds, taking them from viable sources, rather than fan made websites. It would now be nonsensical to revert the edits. PsychopathicAssassin (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- @PsychopathicAssassin: Keep in mind Kanye's article is backed with Metacritic claiming critic acclaim and Rolling Stone 500 best albums of all time. That's not Drake case. Those feuds have already been removed per Discussion, because they aren't encyclopedic. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: Drake also has Metacrtic claim, whilst his albums have repeatedly topped lists fitting of critical acclaim, as well as his albums seeing a large amount of commercial success. The feuds have been reported by reputable outlets, and can be described as encyclopedic. The removal is illogical. PsychopathicAssassin (talk) 22:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- @PsychopathicAssassin: No, this is the album you keep adding is critical acclaimed Metacritic: generally favorable reviews; this is Kanye's Universal acclaim Universal acclaim. Amount of commercial success, you posted "widespread commercial success", not backed with a source claiming that, totally falling on original research and WP:SYN. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Edit: please, don't re-add your content until both discussions reach a conclusion. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: @PsychopathicAssassin: I figured I'd give some outside input on this. I agree with Cornerstonepicker that the addition of the phrase "critical success" was WP:SYN based on the sources that were cited. I have removed this portion from the article. Commercial success I believe can remain because the billboard link shows the backing for that. I hope this helps add some clarity. Dane2007 (talk) 21:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Justin Timberlake
Hello! I have added an award to this article but I can not give a proper summary about it. Can you take a look into it? I added an old issue of Billboard magazine as the reference. Its even there in the Grammy Awards site. Ref: 1 Ref: 2
Thanks. King Cobra (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- @6033CloudyRainbowTrail: I saw the article some time ago, but I didn't know the name of the award. I couldn't find more sources to write a summary. I'll search again to expand. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:2016 MTV VMAs logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:2016 MTV VMAs logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Sfan00 IMG: It's ok, there's a new version of the image uploaded by other user currently used in the article. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Amy Schumer Awards
Hi there, again! I was wondering if you would be able to make a separate page for Amy Schumer's awards? I think she has enough awards/nominations for a separate page to be made for her. I would do it myself, however, I don't know how to. Thank you Lovatc543 (talk) 00:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Lovatc543: for some reason, comedians/TV host (Jimmy Fallon, James Corden) always have the list of their awards included in their main article. However, you can start Schumer's article of her awards and nominations using List of awards and nominations received by Ellen DeGeneres as a main example (copy/paste and replace names). You'll surelly find support for the frequent editors on Schumer's article to keep the new one in WP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 03:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Doubt
Hello,
I was wondering if you can help with the sentences about critical reception that I need to add at the top of some articles that I contributed, because you used the WP:SYN as the reason to take them away completely, but I was looking for some articles that you contributed as well, and you used the WP:SYNTH to take few information about the critics, but not all of them, such as Katy Perry's "Wide Awake", where the sentence "'Wide Awake' garnered mostly favorable critiques from music journalists, who commended its production" is still there, or the Justin Timberlake's "Drink You Away" and Meghan Trainor's "Lips Are Movin" articles, where the critical information is intact. For instance, Rihanna's "Kiss It Better" article has nothing more about the critical reception, not even a sentence, same as all of the Justin Bieber's songs that I revamped, such as "Sorry" and "Company", where the only information were "Music critics mostly were complimentary about its tropical vibe and Bieber's vocals" and "Music critics were mostly complimentary about the R&B environment" respectively. Even the featured article "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" does not have the reception part at all, where all the content was "Most music critics praised the song's smooth production and some noted its similarity to Beyoncé's 2007 single 'Get Me Bodied'. How those statements are different than "critics stated that 'Lips Are Movin' elevated Trainor from a one-hit wonder to a successful pop act"? or "'Drink You Away' received generally positive response from contemporary critics, with some of them labeling the song as a highlight and one of the most impressive moments on the album."? These are not WP:SYNTH too? So how come the reception part not being featured in selected articles, but in some they are intact? Best regards, FanofPopMusic (talk) 22:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
For your most recent contributions to the Trolls soundtrack! Very much appreciated! :) Carbrera (talk) 22:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC) |
Demi lovato main section
Hi there! I was wondering if you could please add "model" to Demi's main page. she signed to Whilelmina modeling last October. it was there but then someone took it off of her page. thanks!! Lovatc543 (talk) 06:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC) Lovatc543 (talk) 06:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Lovatc543 There's an issue with that, she's not known/notable as a model. Lead section and infobox are for main occupations. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MTV Video Music Award for Video of the Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Formation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Side to side
Both "Side to Side" and "Side To Side" are completely blocked for ONE YEAR and can't be edited now. What should I do? U990467 (talk) 16:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Since we're talking about this article (note that the "Side to Side (song)" is blocked until DECEMBER, when the song will probably be over), I also got a question. Now, the song has entered the Hot 100 and others notable charts, as well its video released and a notable live performance. I still don't understand the reason for the block (probably a war edition). Do you know some user who can unblock the page or do you agree with the block? Music01 (talk) 00:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Encore: Movie Partners Sing Broadway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Lady Gaga - Emmy Award win
Hi there! lady gags just won an Emmy for her son Til It Happens To You for The Hunting Ground. I was wondering if you could add her nomination/win to the Emmy section on her awards page. I would do it, only I am unable to. thanks! Lovatc543 (talk) 03:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've read only Diane Warren was credited as a winner @Lovatc543:. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Sia - The Greatest
Hey. I see you reverted my edit of the top section under WP:SYN, which is absolutely true, and kind of fine, as long as one might find an acceptable way to mention the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting in this section, regarding the song's direct connection with it. Feedback? ChrisMartinYoung (talk) 22:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- @ChrisMartinYoung: None from Sia's team has confirmed the song/video is about the shooting. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot
Hello, I noticed you are removing a screenshot from the video of Heathens on its article, I find it unnecessary, it's simply a screenshot of the video. Thanks for reading. EthanRossie2000 (talk) 24 September 2016
- @EthanRossie2000: it is not "just a simply screenshot". I don't think you understand WP strong policies regarding copyright. Please, read WP:NFCCP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Sia; artistry and Lead
Hi. When I looked at the ref for Sia's musical styles, I saw that it did not support the assertion at all. I think that what the article says about her style is basically true, but we need to find refs that verify the assertion. Do you see any good sources to use? All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Ssilvers: I searched everywhere and there's no info about it. I think that was original research. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 03:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Illuminate (Shawn Mendes album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Lemonade Song Covers
I noticed that you reverted several of my edits to songs from Lemonade (Beyoncé album). What would you deem as having a song cover "published"? They were in the CD booklet, just as the covers for "Hold Up" and "Freedom", and yet you haven't reverted those covers. Additionally, they were also published on Beyoncé's official website Beyoncé.com. Thanks, TheKaphox T 22:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC):
- @TheKaphox: can you give me the link @ her website where the covers are? Btw, I did revert the other covers, and you added them again. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: My apologies, I didn't realise that someone had already added an image for the single cover. I just thought that the article didn't have one, so thought that I ought to include it. The single covers are on found here on Beyoncé's website. TheKaphox T 14:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @TheKaphox: you're just assuming those are the official covers, seems those are photos from the music videos. Look at "Formation", that isn't the official cover. Not on iTunes, or on an streaming service. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: I have a physical copy of the album Lemonade. The images listed there are the images that are included in the official liner notes of the CD. This makes me think that they are the official covers. TheKaphox T 14:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @TheKaphox: I know they are featuring in the liner notes, but you're still assuming those are the single covers. It should be removed until a source says "single cover", if there isn't anything on the music services I mentioned before. Again, that isn't the "Formation" cover. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: I have a physical copy of the album Lemonade. The images listed there are the images that are included in the official liner notes of the CD. This makes me think that they are the official covers. TheKaphox T 14:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @TheKaphox: you're just assuming those are the official covers, seems those are photos from the music videos. Look at "Formation", that isn't the official cover. Not on iTunes, or on an streaming service. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 14:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: My apologies, I didn't realise that someone had already added an image for the single cover. I just thought that the article didn't have one, so thought that I ought to include it. The single covers are on found here on Beyoncé's website. TheKaphox T 14:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
"No one else is linked"
Dear fellow editor,
The purpose of the present message is to learn from you, not to challenge; so, thank you for reading it in the spirit in which it was written. In this revert, your edit summary implies that: either all listed names should have been linked, or none of them.
This intrigued me because I was unaware of this guideline; I therefore consulted MOS:LINK and also MOS:LIST, but couldn't find an appropriate guideline. I would therefore be very grateful if you would point me to the relevant guideline, whenever convenient. Thank you very much, in advance, for your helpful assistance.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 15:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Beyoncé Award Main Image
Hey! Seeing as you seem a bit more adept to Wikipedia than I am, and involved in the "List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé" page, I was wondering if you could help me out? Is it possible to have a new main image for the page? The previous one is now 7 years old. I'm not overly sure or confident enough to replace the image myself, but I was thinking an image from Beyoncé's recent sweep at the 2016 VMA awards? Maybe this one: http://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/news/g4004/beyonce-vma-outfits/?slide=2 It'd be much appreciated! Angelic-alyssa (talk) 11:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Angelic-alyssa:, that image cannot be added to Commons unless it is freely licenced, and it's pretty clear that isn't. It would be better to choose a photo that is already on Commons, than attempt to get a photo you find on the internet uploaded there, as such an image is likely to be copyrighted and copyrighted material is not allowed in WP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Cornerstonepicker:, thanks very much for your response. I appreciate the assistance. Angelic-alyssa (talk) 23:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Angelic-alyssa:, that image cannot be added to Commons unless it is freely licenced, and it's pretty clear that isn't. It would be better to choose a photo that is already on Commons, than attempt to get a photo you find on the internet uploaded there, as such an image is likely to be copyrighted and copyrighted material is not allowed in WP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Grande
Routine calculations are NOT synth. See Wikipedia:No original research#Routine calculations. This simple arithmetic from uncontroversial sources that simply total up numbers disclosed by and official counter. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Ssilvers: My bad, didn't see Youtube channels have data showing the total views. I added "combined", so people can understand all the videos are counted. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi again. Would you be willing to weigh in this RfC regarding AnyDecentMusic? should be added in the album ratings template like Metacritic, because the website is another review aggregator. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Roman's Revenge
Hi. I noticed that, on the "Roman's Revenge" article, you reverted my edit claiming that the single wasn't supported by any source. The single is in fact the official cover, as per Spotify and iTunes. I have re-added the single cover to the article. Thanks, TheKaphox T 18:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- I'ts ok, you should've stated that in the field "source". However, that's the cover of The Lil Wayne remix, which is the single version, not the album track that features Eminem. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
"Sorry" and "Freedom" covers
I do know that the artworks are derived from her liner notes, but I actually checked to see if they are the official artwork, and they turned out to be the official artwork. Although I admit that I derived it from a rather unreliable website (Josepvinaixa), the blogger had noted that they derived it from the record label (because I've seen him labelling if it is a fanmade cover too). I can't seem to actually find the actual source, but it seems legitimate. Cheers, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Nahnah4: Where did you check those are the official covers? Those are stills from the music videos, check the 'cover' for "Formation". Isn't the official. We can't just assume. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Rihanna's Webby Awards
I will be reverting your recent edit on the List of awards and nominations received by Rihanna. Billboard and Entertainment Weekly announced that Rihanna was the nominee. Please refer to the articles below:
- http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/awards/7325238/beyonce-rihanna-2016-webby-awards
- http://www.ew.com/article/2016/04/05/webby-awards-2016-nominations
Besides, ANTIdiary is Rihanna's only project to be nominated on the Webby Awards. Mat 1997 (talk) 02:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Can you please keep an eye on the article? Destiny Leo (talk) 05:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Hey can you help me by having this in pose, because it only had three publications on the list, I think it's necessary having it in pose. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for this edit I should have do it myself, but I not a very good editor, so that's why I ask you in the first place. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- No problem Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Cornerstonepicker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Daddy Lessons as a single.
Hey, Cornerstonepicker Daddy Lessons was not a single. It was not sent out to radio. These sources show All Night as the 5th single and 4th in the US. [1] [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gishmuya (talk • contribs) 22:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Gishmuya: As I told you in Lemonade's Talk page, there's no way Direct Lyrics or Idolator are better sources than iTunes itself. It doesn't need to be send to radio in order to be a single. It is a single (stand-alone release) on iTunes and Spotify. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
References
Did you want to check the recent chart edits. I've already hit my 3 reverts for the day. I don't know if it is the same editor using different IP's inflating numbers or if my charts haven't updated and everyone else is putting out the right numbers. Kellymoat (talk) 19:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Kellymoat: This edit added false numbers, but this is correct, I just checked the current charts. I'll keep an eye on it either way. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- When I click the references posted within the charts, I am still seeing my numbers. I even made a few clicks on the site to get to the actual chart instead of the artist chart and still see my numbers. It's only two or three that are different. But, like I said, I've already done 3 reverts and don't want to continue doing it if it is a refresh issue.
Conetstonepicker is deleting every edits from other editors.Mean guy Thurako.26 (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
7/27
Why did you revert my edit saying this is an unreliable source? http://www.horapoptv.com.br/single-post/2016/06/29/Fifth-Harmony-recebe-placa-de-platina-pelas-vendas-do-727-no-Brasil It has a picture of 5H holding their platinum plaque, how much more reliable can you get? The Brazil certifications website is far more unreliable, as it often doesn't update. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookies32895i4 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Cookies32895i4: Would a random blog with that picture be accepted as well? How is the Brazil cert website more unreliable when it's the Official source? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 07:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Me asking you again to have this in pose, because I'm not sure a table for only four publications is not enough. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for this edit. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- But when I look at this source, it's a mid-year list, not a year-of-end list, I'm sure you can fix it. Thanks. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Don't worry, I got it. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- But when I look at this source, it's a mid-year list, not a year-of-end list, I'm sure you can fix it. Thanks. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
JTimberlake
I have added an award requested by a user sometime ago. Ref:1 2 3 I have not added any descriptions.
King Cobra (talk) 16:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll see if I can add descrps. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure if you are a fan of Azealia Banks or even know who she is - it is highly evident that you did not check the sources thoroughly. Azealia Banks herself has confirmed these sources, as well as the release date. You should check her Twitter for more information instead of automatically deleting an article about an album that was announced nearly 3 years ago. Banks has also confirmed the recorded songs numerous times-therefore the source that provided the songs was correct. Thanks. Wizardofoz30
- @Wizardofoz30: There's a reason why WP only works with WP:RELIABLE SOURCES, if none of them have reported about it, is for a reason. Some random Twitter account owned by unknown people and that unreliable website are not WP material.. wait until the album is released to consider it notable/encyclopedic. It is also failing WP:TOOSOON. You may be a fan of hers, but this is not a fan blog. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if you could help me improve this article. There are a lot of people who are vandalizing the article and not referencing. I would really appreciate it. Thanks! Wizardofoz30 —Preceding undated comment added 02:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
If you don't reply soon, I'm reverting the article back. And I suggest actually watching Moana first in English and reviewing the transcript of the Miranda interview before you reply. It looks much better when your opinions are based on the actual content at issue. --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey there. Don't delete her page because she's about to be Dancing with the Stars and her dance scores will be added weekly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afterpartylaur (talk • contribs) 08:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
I too want to add here as well. We use to be on the same page about articles being created and other various citations. I am not going to revert your edits to avoid an edit-conflict war. That would be unnecessary but tell me why .. I added a paragraph edit response because I wanted you to see why the citations were important. I've stated several times on why she is a singer-songwriter. It's more than just being signed to a songwriting company. She has released music that she co-wrote. Her debut single Love Lies is co-wrote by her and singer Khalid. She has also wrote various other songs which I tried to explain in my edits multiple times. My question is what more does she need to prove that she is in fact a singer-songwriter and not just a singer? We were on the same page about Lauren Jauregui not being ready to create her own article. As she and bandmate Ally Brooke only released one single at the time. We were on the same page about other edits that needed to be reverted, changed, sorted and etc .. I am not saying that I am appalled by your reverts. For instance your revert to reference on Normani having the highest charted single made by a girl member. I didn't complain about that as all you were doing was correcting grammatical errors. It's an important piece of citation information but I liked how you just cleaned it up instead of reverting it. I just want you to explain more on why certain things needed to be reverted. Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Welcometothenewmillenium: Singer-songwriter is not the same as singer and songwriter. Then, no source calls her like any of them. She signed for songwriting royalties, but is not her occupation yet. She hasn't released a solo album, and even reaching for her group work, her writing credits there were poor. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Picture used in article Dangerous Woman (album)
Hello! (I don't found any "talk" page so I decided published here). Then, you removed the picture added upon the article of Dangerous Woman album. That picture is on album's liner notes, so its licensed and the photo of Fifth Harmony is present in the group's official site and social media. Can you tell me how add an acceptable "license" in both pictures? Thanks for attention. LikeGaga '(Talk)' 02:15 5, March 2017 —Preceding undated comment added 03:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- @LikeGaga: A picture you normally find in websites have copyright and are not free to be used on WP Commons. This is an example of a licensed picture. In fact, users in Commons tend to use files made available under the CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. This is an example of the latter. Copyright is an important issue to WP. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
JTimberlake
Hello, again. I added one more award. But, no info.
- http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news/2009/04/01/justin-timberlake-sandra-bullock-paris-hilton-to-appear-on-bravos-a-list-awards-30886/20090401bravo02/
- https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DIu6ErnA4Ro
- http://ew.com/article/2009/04/16/bravos-a-list-a/
King Cobra (talk) 22:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Liam-payne-strip-that-down.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Liam-payne-strip-that-down.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Vandalism on Halo article
Hi. A user vandalized the Halo song article changing Kelly Clarkson's accusation about Already Gone to some joke about Kanye West. Im still new to Wikipedia and don't know how to change it back. I was hoping you can help. Kind regards Andrea353 (talk) 18:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. In regards to refer to the aforementioned genres in a precise manner. NME Review says "‘Sounds Good Feels Good’ is obviously more pop than punk", which sounds a little too vague. 183.171.183.81 (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
"Slide" genre(s)
Hi User:Cornerstonepicker, I sourced all the genres on Slide (Calvin Harris song) myself a while back, but knowing what I know now I'm not sure whether the song is being called these genres or the production of the song is. Since you make important edits to many music articles, can you please take a close look at the sources and let me know if you think they're worded in a way that makes it acceptable for them to be used as genres? Here [4], [5], [6], thanks.--Theo Mandela (talk) 04:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Theo Mandela: personally, I avoid using Forbes contributors as references for music genres, critical reception, and that stuff, per WP:PUS. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ok User:Cornerstonepicker, overall do you think any genres need to go or the sources specifically call the song these genres? Thanks. --Theo Mandela (talk) 05:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- yeah I think "Pop", "funk" and "nu disco" are properly sourced. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks User:Cornerstonepicker, is this just because you don't see Forbes as reliable, or do you think they're not directly calling this song R&B and pop? I'm concerned that "production... that blends..." doesn't equate to this song being R&B and pop, thanks again.--Theo Mandela (talk) 10:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Theo Mandela: Both. I don't see Forbes contributors as reliable. The magazine/website has its own staff and also contributors. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:58, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks User:Cornerstonepicker, is this just because you don't see Forbes as reliable, or do you think they're not directly calling this song R&B and pop? I'm concerned that "production... that blends..." doesn't equate to this song being R&B and pop, thanks again.--Theo Mandela (talk) 10:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- yeah I think "Pop", "funk" and "nu disco" are properly sourced. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ok User:Cornerstonepicker, overall do you think any genres need to go or the sources specifically call the song these genres? Thanks. --Theo Mandela (talk) 05:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Cornerstonepicker, just letting you know a new song article has been created for "Instruction". It's released to streaming on Friday, any edits you can make would be a great benefit :)--Theo Mandela (talk) 22:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Progress/Fifth Harmony
I have edited multiple Fifth Harmony articles, rewriting and fixing up the songs and awards section. The only problem I face is the limited amount of pictures that I can use to expand their main article. Is there a way where a recent picture of the group can be legally uploaded to Commons?
Also, are my edits presentable to the common reader? I do not want to sound like a typical-fan editing with no reliable source or poorly-written grammar. Thanks. De88 (talk) 08:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- @De88: I do believe the intro section for Fifth Harmony discography is too much; they are just in their second album. Needs to be condensed. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Until the End of Time (Justin Timberlake and Beyoncé song)
Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.thethomascrownchronicles.com/2007_10_01_archive.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: It was actually from the Billboard article cited. My bad, forgot to rephrase it. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Lauren Jauregui
I'm confused as to why there is a discussion debate on whether or not Lauren Jauregui should have a stand alone article. I understand that each member has done other work outside the group but the other members pages are redirected and cited in the Fifth Harmony members section. To me I feel as though she has not gained notability outside the group. By that I mean her own headline tour, her debut album, her debut movie, TV show and other stuff. She is still touring with the band and has released singles and albums that is with the band hence her still being in the band. The only thing I've seen that she has gained outside the group is colloberating with two other artists on a song and winning an LGBT award. That doesn't surprise me because still is still apart of the group and once she leaves then she might do all the other stuff. To me that does not stand valuable enough to create an article about her. Normani Kordei was on Dancing with the Stars her citation is listed under the member section. Ally Brooke collaborated with other artists her citation information is listed underneath the member section. Dinah Jane has done other work on the side of the but her information is all listed underneath the section. Each member has done side work but their side work does not gain them notability outside the group. Camila Cabello is the only member with an article because she has done some of the stuff I listed above. She is in the process of releasing her debut album. She's released singles and they've charted in many different countries. She's been nominated and won many awards more than just one. To top it all off She left the group and is now a solo artist in that case an article was needed for her but the others not as much. ---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM (Talk) 21:14, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Welcometothenewmillenium: The article is full of Fifth Harmony info and her personal life. I also don't get the point. Ally Brooke also has a new article, with a discussion for deletion. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:39, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I have opened an SPI report. Feel free to comment. Destiny Leo (talk) 07:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- The link isn't working Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Many citations, help correct and self-published sources
Please do consider reading these - WP:OVERCITE, WP:PRESERVE and WP:SELFPUB. It's not an issue to have many citations to a sentence unless it gets to where every word has three or four citations. Instead of removing content from an article, consider correcting inaccuracies, while keeping the rest of the content intact. Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities. - TheMagnificentist 04:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fetish (Official Single Cover) by Selena Gomez.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Fetish (Official Single Cover) by Selena Gomez.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Range on "Can't Stop The Feeling!"
Wouldn't that contradict the article for "Mirrors", since it says "(sheet music commonly prints the notes of a melody an octave higher to keep it within the staff)"? And could we say that site is all that reliable? Since he's barely even touches the 6th octave? Every single vocal range video I could find shows he tops out around B5 or C6. -- Telie2222 (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Telie2222: The website is sponsored by Music Teachers National Association. "Mirrors" is the first article I read that features that line you're mentioning; I guess it should be removed. Idk where they got that info from. Changing the numbers would be WP:Original Research... unless somewhere in the website says it is indeed written one octave higher. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Maluma
Please stop changing the Maluma article. I've opened a Talk section so you can respond:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Maluma_(singer)#Maluma.27s_influences.3F
AyanP (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)AyanP
Can you expand and revamp the article, remove some non-reliable sources. 115.164.84.195 (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Move review for Damn (Kendrick Lamar album)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 12:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/Wikipedian1818 added back with acoustic a genre. Can you remove it? 115.164.176.22 (talk) 18:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Camila Cabello - Havana (Official Single Cover).jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Camila Cabello - Havana (Official Single Cover).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Camila Cabello - OMG (Official Single Cover).jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Camila Cabello - OMG (Official Single Cover).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Slow Hands (Niall Horan song)
Hey, can you help keep an eye on Slow Hands (Niall Horan song) for any contention over genres? You may have the page watchlisted anyway, but I just noticed in August some annoying editor who thinks it's okay to write "fucking" this and "fucking" that in edit summaries removed a genre because they for some reason think Billboard is not a reliable source...? They seem to get into this quite a bit over genres so I wouldn't be surprised if they come back. Ss112 11:54, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Cornerstonepicker, can you be on the lookout for any publications that call "Silence" by specific genres please? I've struggled to find any and the term "dance" is currently in the infobox, which is just too broad to be meaningful in song articles. Hope you can help, cheers. Theo (edits) 11:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Mic Drop Remix
Hey, thanks for creating content at Mic Drop (song), but were you aware of Mic Drop Remix existing? That article is definitely not in the right place and appears to have a lot of bad formatting on it. Not sure what to do with it. Ss112 19:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Ss112: MIC Drop Remix? Just seen it, with a c/p of the Composition section. It's a song so Mic Drop (song) is the correct title with no italics. I guess it should just be combined on Mic Drop (song) to make things easier. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, forgot "MIC" was capitalised. Do you think it'd be easy for you to combine/rewrite some of the material, then maybe when there's not much left to combine, redirect it there? I would, but I don't want to step on your toes when you've been working on "Mic Drop (song)" is all. Ss112 20:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Ss112: I can but wouldn't the name still and issue? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oh no, I meant combine the material that's on "MIC Drop Remix" into "Mic Drop (song)", because as you pointed out, the one you created is in the right place. A note of a remix isn't really part of the title, and it was just "Mic Drop" before it was a remix. Ss112 23:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Done. still have an issue with that "topping 47 iTunes" section, for my part I'd wait for the song to top Digital Sales charts and then add it. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 23:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oh no, I meant combine the material that's on "MIC Drop Remix" into "Mic Drop (song)", because as you pointed out, the one you created is in the right place. A note of a remix isn't really part of the title, and it was just "Mic Drop" before it was a remix. Ss112 23:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Ss112: I can but wouldn't the name still and issue? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, forgot "MIC" was capitalised. Do you think it'd be easy for you to combine/rewrite some of the material, then maybe when there's not much left to combine, redirect it there? I would, but I don't want to step on your toes when you've been working on "Mic Drop (song)" is all. Ss112 20:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Cornerstonepicker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Accolades or year-end lists
Hi. I saw your edits to several album articles earlier (including Culture (Migos album)) and based on previous years' sections and what a publication ranking an album more broadly is (an accolade, an acknowledgment of its merit), I think we should stick with "accolades". I understand that maybe you changed these thinking that it may be confused with awards given to an album (which also often bear the heading "accolades"), but most albums that made year-end lists in 2016 used the heading "accolades", so it's also going off precedent. Ss112 05:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Those accolades come from Critics, so they are inside the Critical Reception section. Then, awards don't go there since awards don't come from critics. So there is an "accolades" section and an "awards" section (?). Films use Top ten lists. I also find weird seeing "Accolades" for an album ranked 40 or 50 in a list. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- I wasn't saying actual awards (like Grammys and such) should go in a critical reception section. Awards and nominations can be its own section. Accolades being a heading under critical reception makes more sense as like you just said, they're given by critics. While what you said may be true for films, films and music are two different scopes and have their own standards and WikiProjects relating to them. I mean, being ranked on a list at all out of all the albums released in a year still kind of is an "accolade". Ss112 06:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Ss112: While on topic, is there an order for these sections? I often see Awards after the Tracklist, almost at the botton of the article. Sometimes I see awards in prose or table but before the tracklist. Just looking for uniformity. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure. MOS:ALBUM doesn't really say anything about it. But most albums I see generally arrange awards as part of the accolades section (in a different wikitable in the same section) or after certifications, before release history. There should be some uniformity or guideline on it, but I don't think there is. Ss112 01:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Ss112: While on topic, is there an order for these sections? I often see Awards after the Tracklist, almost at the botton of the article. Sometimes I see awards in prose or table but before the tracklist. Just looking for uniformity. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- I wasn't saying actual awards (like Grammys and such) should go in a critical reception section. Awards and nominations can be its own section. Accolades being a heading under critical reception makes more sense as like you just said, they're given by critics. While what you said may be true for films, films and music are two different scopes and have their own standards and WikiProjects relating to them. I mean, being ranked on a list at all out of all the albums released in a year still kind of is an "accolade". Ss112 06:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hey, also, would you be able to keep an eye on Perfect (Ed Sheeran song)? I know we've spoken about it elsewhere already but there are a few IPs and editors intent on saying Beyonce was credited where she wasn't, particularly for the Australian and Irish listings when both the singles chart pages do not list her. (No need to ping me, I'm following your talk page!) Ss112 07:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Camila-cabello-crying-in-the-club.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Camila-cabello-crying-in-the-club.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Camila-Cabello-I-Have-Questions.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Camila-Cabello-I-Have-Questions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Would you be willing to weigh in this discussion regarding the infobox should keep "playlist" instead of mixtape. Only if you interested. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bartier Cardi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Vandalism on articles
Cornerstonepicker --- A user decided it was a good idea to create Ally brooke <<<--- this article is poorly sourced and not precisely done in a mannered fashion. She has not done work outside the group .. one single does not cut it! I recommend it be delete and a discussion topic discussed about the page being deleted.Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 01:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 12
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- 2018 iHeartRadio Music Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Walk on Water, Brett Young, SZA, Believer, Royal Blood, No Promises, Rockabye, Kevin Ross and Mi Gente
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Camila vocal producer additions
Hey, I saw on Camila (album) you reverted an edit by the user Lil-unique1. It appears this user is adamant about a vocal producer being equivalent to a record producer on Havana (Camila Cabello song) and insists on including the name in the infobox, despite the fact this is not common practice in infoboxes. Can you keep an eye out? I've warned them. Hey @SNUGGUMS: maybe you've seen this too? Like, Template:Infobox song says only include those credited with record production, in bold. This user is apparently experienced and doesn't get it. I'm very confused. Ss112 13:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Haven't seen this myself, but if it isn't supposed to be there, then why he'd insist on including that is beyond me. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Will the vocals producers stay in the producers field? the user also added additional songwriters Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I think infoboxes and track listing templates don't have the same guidelines apply to them, especially when producers are usually an added extra column to track listings, so it's kind of like users deciding what to put there of their own accord anyway. It isn't really structured. I didn't mean Jimmio78's edits anyway. The ones I was referring to were made by Lil-unique1. Ss112 17:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Will the vocals producers stay in the producers field? the user also added additional songwriters Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
I already explained Musicnotes.com is reliable for the music arrangement related details, not for genres. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_56#Musicnotes.com) but a non-admin user reverted it back and asked "says who?"[7] 115.164.215.178 (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Fake News Awards
An article that you have been involved in editing—Fake News Awards—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 23:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Timberlake
Hi, thanks for leaving me a message, please look at the talk page of the List of best-selling music artists, inside me and other editor talking about Timberlake possibility to entering the list. He would need about 60 million certified units for 88m claim, and I think his certified sales able to reach that. In this moment, we just wait a reliable source to speak officially about his 88m-claim and I need your help to maintain Timberlake's page and prevent any vandalism to his 88m claim that I found for him. Thanks Politsi (talk) 01:26, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Camila Cabello
Hi, I would like to obviously thank you for your edit to the article Camila Cabello and all you extra work that you have done to her "Artistry" but, i would to ask why you removed the sources? i get that sources don't really have to be in the infobox but, why didn't you move them to the "Artistry"? To be honest i'm pretty sure she is more R&B then the normal pop so i was hoping that you would consider re-adding them in again. Malacify247 (talk) 23:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Malacify247: None of those sources call her an R&B artist, nor call Camila an R&B album. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker: Ok thank you for telling me because i was confused, But thank you and i will make sure to find a reliable source next time. Malacify247 (talk) 05:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- I second that. Excellent work. Keep rocking! Regards, Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 09:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For excellent articles on recent JT songs. Thanks! Hayman30 (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC) |
AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS OF BEYONCÉ
Girl, you removed many awards on Beyoncé official pafe such as Trumpet Award, it is an original award recognizing black excellence. You can searched it on the net. Great Big Story is also an award show recognizing excellence in philanthropic campaign.
PS. I have list of Beyoncé awards but I cant edit it due to her page is private. Can you please help me? Beyhiveboys (talk) 13:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Not covered by major media + no big organization + no article: non-notable award. WP:INDISCRIMINATE Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Courtesy notice of discussion
Considering you do edit a good amount of albums on the Wikipedia, I thought I'd make you aware of this discussion to edit the current battle of {{Infobox album}}. Hope to see you there! livelikemusic talk! 15:10, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Why did you delete Little Mix off the top 10 list?
Hi! I wanted to know why you deleted Little Mix off the top 10 list for best selling girl groups of all time. They should be 7 place, right above Bananaramas. Their sales have been confirmed by Global and MTV at 45 million records sold world wide.
Thanks. Barbiegirlyforever21 (talk) 00:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Barbiegirlyforever21: There's a discussion on Talk:Little Mix about it. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:07, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Stop deleting them off the list for no good reason. They have valid sources behind their sales, but you’ll be gossip blogs & other tabloids instead for other girl groups. That’s not fair at all. Also, Little Mix isn’t the only one who’s number are helped by streams. I don’t see you questioning the Kpop groups number (who also uses streams). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbiegirlyforever21 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- The reason's been explained. I'm not questioning streams at all: certifications include streaming. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Your reason is that you just can’t believe Little Mix sold 45 million records world wide, even though it’s been confirmed by valid sources (MTV, Global & their label), unlike some of these other girl groups whose only back up is gossip blogs. You’re showing immense bias towards Little Mix right now, for no reason besides the fact you’re in denial. And once again, Wikipedia is not always up to date and all their certifications (and eligible certifications) aren’t on this website. For all we know, people probably deleted their certifications just like you’re deleting them on the list of best selling girl groups, despite their being outright proof of their total record sales. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbiegirlyforever21 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- My reason is that the group's total units certified (13.1M) don't cover 75% of claimed sales (45M). It is a rule to follow (List of best selling artists). Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:24, 13
I find it funny how this rule is just now being enacted on Little Mix when they’ve been on the list since early 2017, when they received their plaque from their label stating they had 30 million albums and singles sold world wide. And this number continued to grow over the year to reach 45 million. I don’t know why you think their label would go through lengths to lie to their faces like that. And again, certifications on Wikipedia aren’t all updated. Did you add up all the certifications on Wikipedia for all the other girl groups, or you’re only showing bias towards Little Mix? It’s sad how their sales are updated and confirmed multiple times but they still don’t get the credit. Biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbiegirlyforever21 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Quoting the article:
...The more recent the artist, the higher the required percentage of certified units, so artists such as Rihanna, Chris Brown, Taylor Swift, Flo Rida, Katy Perry, Justin Bieber, Adele, Lady Gaga, Bruno Mars, Nicki Minaj and Ed Sheeran are expected to have their claimed figures supported by over 75% in certified units. The certified units are sourced from available online databases of local music industry associations. All certified units are converted from Gold/Platinum/Diamond certification awards based on criteria provided by certifying bodies. The certified units percentage varies according to the first year that an artist appeared in the charts.[a] The requirements of certified units are designed to avoid inflated sales figures, which are frequently practiced by record companies for promotional purposes...
- Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
You really think their label inflated 31.9 million record sales? I get it if they inflated to like 15 million (based on you saying they only sold 13.1 million from Wikipedia certifications), but 31.9 million? Why would a label even fanthom such an inflation, let alone give them a certified plaque stating their sales? Just know that not all their certifications can be found on Wikipedia, people don’t update or in some cases, people delete them because they don’t believe it’s true, their label also haven’t bought a lot of the plaques to make it official, and yes, sales do add up here and there in countries all over the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbiegirlyforever21 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- What I think doesn't change the facts already explained. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Your effort
I notice than you leaving a message with word "unreliable source" in two of my personal effort at Ed Sheeran's and Chris Brown profile. I hope you also put your work and effort to find a better source for both artist's sales claim, your favorite artist (Justin Timberlake) will never having the prestigious title "one of the world's best selling music artists" if not because my effort. If you not yet able finding the reliable source for Brown and Sheeran. I suggest you to step back, and not interrupt while I trying to find a better source for them. Thanks Politsi (talk) 03:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- To step back..? I answered on your talk page. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker, The Guardian already change their format into tabloid since 2018. So you think The Guardian also should be banned from Wikipedia?, I agree that we should maintain the highest quality of the reliable source that we use for artists biography especially for the best selling music list but sometimes we should allow some source which is still quite reliable and still have a good reputation for temporary, do you still remember the source that I used for Timberlake's 56m singles sales from Rock in Rio?, that source is not a broadsheet newspaper and only a music festival. That source is worst than The Courier-Mail that I have used for Ed Sheeran's new claim And you even saying Thank you to me for using Rock in Rio, because yeah... Timberlake is your idol... you are not consistent with your act then I suggest you better repair yourself as editor before you judge the other editor.. and for your record. IT'S ME who have found the reliable source from The Hollywood Reporter for Ed Sheeran's 76m claim.Politsi (talk) 01:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Politsi: At the time, I didn't know you have such practice. I guess you think you have a point mentioning Timberlake like four times so far, which is an article I helped a lot, along with articles of many other artists. That doesn't justify your procedures. It doesn't matter who googled "Ed Sheeran records sold" and found The Hollywood Reporter, matters that it is a reliable source. What we are not going to do is inflating the claim for online media to see while reverting users that point out the WP:Original research. No one mentioned 126M sold (or your claim 100M singles sold) until you put it there because you thought he has sold that much. Stick to THR source. I don't even think this is my topic, and administrator should be looking into this. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 23:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
@Cornerstonepicker, I believe you already know that I handle the List of best-selling music artists and always updating the claim sales of those artists inside the list when their certified sales increasing. If you look inside, you will understand how high Ed Sheeran's certified sales so far and the 76m claim from THR is no longer reliable. I put the higher claim sales in his profile page in order to encourage the media to verify and double check the data, in that moment we've got the reliable source for new claim sales of some artists. In this time, I will let the claim sales at Ed Sheeran's profile page in range 76m claim from THR, but when his position in the List has been move with the new and higher claim sales. I will change it also at his profile page.Politsi (talk) 01:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Politsi: Understood. What about Chris Brown? That source says he sold "nearly 100 million records". 97M? 90M? The claim is vague, to be translated to the strong claim Brown has sold more than 100 million records. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker, Okay I change it with this source / https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/singers/chris-brown-net-worth/ from CelebrityNetWorth, the source may not reliable enough but usable for temporary. Leave it in Brown's page, unless you have a better source. Politsi (talk) 09:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Politsi: His new source in the list is ideal. I've seen celebritynetworth.com being removed over and over again for unreliable. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:19, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Cornerstonepicker, that new source is also found by me, have you read the talk page? I'm the main contributor why the list able to consist a nearly complete artists with the highest selling records. Listen, when Brown's certified sales pass 100m. I will put the 100m claim sales from celebritynetworth.com to encourage media releasing a new and higher claim sales for Brown. Politsi (talk) 11:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Politsi: It doesn't matter who found the source. celebritynetworth is unreliable. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Matthew Hussey and Camila Cabello
Would like an explanation of why you have removed my edits about their dating when there are public images of the two posing together and several notable sources on the matter. Thanks. -Aliceba (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Aliceba: Again, WP:NOTADIARY, not every relationship is notable. They haven't even confirmed a relationship. The sources you have posted are tabloids.
Even when an individual is notable, not all events they are involved in are.
- Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Never Be the Same Tour.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Never Be the Same Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Never Be the Same Tour.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Never Be the Same Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Stapleton's All-American Road Show Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fire Away (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
DRN notice
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Bardigang (talk) 15:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Ariana Grande genre change
Hello there! I would just like to ask why you reverted the edit? Just because i'm pretty new and i'm still trying to get to the looks of things. :) Pineapple tuner9 (talk) 06:33, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Pineapple tuner9: None of those sources claim they are her main genres. Only that she "incorporates" that into her music. Other sources call her mainly Pop/R&B. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Girls (Rita Ora song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page XXL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sangria Wine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Camila Cabello's instruments
Hi. Can you please join the discussion? There is the same user trying to add this edit again. They don't want to listen to me. Best regards. --Miaow 00:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. If you have an issue with my edits feel free to message me and we can reach a consensus. 115.164.91.53 (talk) 10:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Camila Cabello Instruments
Hi. I see you reverted the changes to Camila Cabello's Instruments [8] but can you take a look at the talk page? I didn't simply revert the edits for fun and I've explained in detail why the edits should be made. There are several references I have provided that certify that the instruments I added are not just instruments she's played but that are notable to her career as a performer. The countless references I've provided more than fit the criteria but the other editor keeps coming up with new things to complain about, even as we've gotten a neutral third opinion. Alolanle ([[User talk:|talk]]) 07:56, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Alolanle have added guitar and piano again. Since you are an expert in music articles, I notify you of this ([9] [10]) so that you can check if the changes are correct per Template:Infobox musical artist#instrument. I have serious doubts about the piano Best regards. --Miaow 16:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cornerstonepicker, would you be able to add the "Pony (Jump On It)" artwork to the infobox please? Appreciated if you can. --Theo Mandela (talk) 03:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey, looks like editors are still removing "Barbie Tingz" because of Minaj's comment. Can you maybe restore it back to the proper wording/formatting when you get the time? I don't even know where to begin. Ss112 15:33, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:IHeartRadio Music Awards 2018 logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:IHeartRadio Music Awards 2018 logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
DylanDean made a death threats on his user talk page, saying "gonna die rotten". I suggest we take action against this guy if he can't stop making false accusations and start making good edits. 183.171.121.12 (talk) 06:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fefe (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Citation errors
Please fix them on Kamikaze (Eminem album). ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Billboard ref
It is now fixed. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. If you have an issue with my edits feel free, and we can reach a consensus. 183.171.123.78 (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Britney concerts
Britney Spears: Piece of Me Tour and Britney: Live in Concert are THE SAME show, the difference is that she add 2 songs to the setlist. I'm sure that almost all fans agree on that, and it makes no sense to separate asian shows, just because there's a space between the realization of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thiago Pedro (talk • contribs) 17:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Comment for RfC involving the lead section of Swimming (Mac Miller album)
Can you please vote or comment at this RfC involving the lead section of Swimming? TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi.
Hi. Cornerstonepicker. How are you doing? 183.171.114.239 (talk) 09:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- feel free on Wikimedia talk page. 183.171.113.96 (talk) 09:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
You keep removing my edits
You keep removing my edits but if you look at the sources they are accurate.
- @Kingjustin2425: twitter pages are unreliable sources. Stop re-adding it. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I can use another source if that would be better... why didn't you just say that. Also chart data is used and cited by so many artists...
- @Kingjustin2425: Avoid twitter pages, blogs, record labels, and artists themselves as sources for sales. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Okay
- @Kingjustin2425: now you're adding SPS (sales + streaming) units from HitsDailyDouble. The field "Sales" is for pure sales. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Why is it only for pure sales... thats a flaw in the wikipedia page. Streams count as sales now
SPS is all that matter because most of the time now pure sales just means merch and tour bundles...
- @Kingjustin2425: Streams don't counts as sales; streaming units count for SPS units and certifications. Billboard, Nielsen and IFPI report pure sales and SPS separately. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Correct... but I'm saying SPS is what matters now a days there is a reason why EQUIVALENT album units is what is used now... thats what I am trying to say (stream equivalent album units + TEA + "pure" album sales = total sales) What wikipedia could do is have a "pure" album sales column and a total album sales SPS column
- @Kingjustin2425: Billboard has its own formula for album-equivalent units, RIAA has its own formula for their certifications, there isn't a WW formula (each country counts streaming different). Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
For example in the US alone Scorpion has sold 3,300,000 and worldwide the total is 3,621,000 why don't you want to use the information... its definitelyy more useful and less misleading then just having "pure" sales
- @Kingjustin2425: The certification (when his record label updates it) represents SPS. Now, what is your source for Worldwide? the unreliable Mediatraffic or chartdata (that takes stats from that page)?
Wouldn't it be better to change the title of sales to album equivalent units though. And it was nielsen sound scan that was my source...
- @Kingjustin2425: Nielsen Soundscan only reports United States. As I said, BB, Nielsen and IFPI report pure sales. IFPI reports WW pure sales in April yearly. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I can literally send you the nielsen midyear report it has SPS on it as well, and bilboard reports SPS and "pure" if you actually read the article you would know that.
- @Kingjustin2425: It reports pure sales...and SPS. I meant to say-they report both separetly. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:53, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
You should atleast add a category called album equivalent units
Nicki Minaj
Hi there. I notice you always edit or makes changes after I edit Nicki Minaj. I recently posted to her talk page about potential additions to her "Controversies" section. Can you go read it and leave your opinion? Thanks! Kim Leung (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Why is the good form being deleted I have provided sources and list information.The article was first deleted without reason first now I have improved it added some citation.#Haterade
WIKIZILE (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey! I'm currently in the process of planning an FA nomination for the article and will be listing Lips Are Movin as a co-nominator. However, as the second largest contributor to the article in terms of edits [11] and fifth by content, I'd be glad to have you as the third nominator. But only if you want it! Awaiting your response.--NØ 13:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'll be proceeding with the nomination tomorrow, I've assumed you don't want to be a co-nom. Thanks for all your help with the article anyway!--NØ 15:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Cornerstonepicker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Cornerstonepicker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Diligence Barnstar Award
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
message Sirsentence (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC) |
I award you this diligence Barnstar. You are one of the most persevering and dedicated editors I’ve seen on here. You constantly are updating and adding important information. I see on pages I edit, you have a LONG history of creating, editing and contributing. You are fantastic. Thanks for all you do. Sirsentence (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to understand how this page could be deleted because first I was told the song hasn't been released and that it didn't have many sources,So I brought the same page that was deleted cause the song will be released on 29.November. WIKIZILE (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Can you keep an eye on the page? Make sure whoever adding genres are based on sources that explicitly says what it is. 2402:1980:8249:4C2E:C584:44C4:7D24:9C14 (talk) 06:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, can you correct a misuse word in Camila Cabello Wikipedia page?
Wrong: "It was [reviled] that Cabello was working on new music." Correct: "It was [revealed] that Cabello was working on new music."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camila_Cabello — Preceding unsigned comment added by HelpOP101 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
But Frank ocean too had a article about his radio show why would this be deleted,the show was iconic and notable it deserved a Wikipedia page?? WIKIZILE (talk) 15:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC) WIKIZILE (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Money (Cardi B song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Cut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bohemian Rhapsody (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julian Day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protecting a page from vandalism.
Camila Cabello Wikipedia semi-protection expired yesterday and it has already been edited 5 times. It's there someone that can get it protected again and prevent vandalism? Thanks. Disciple101 (talk) 11:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
So are we now going against what was told to "me" by "you" earlier?
I'm trying to figure out what's going on (what's the deal)? I feel personally attacked now because at Cardi B you referenced I needed to check WP:GA which I have done since day 1 of starting. I ignored the first edit and said "maybe I was wrong and forgot" now I edit the breif summary and you attack again and now I know "this time" it isn't me. Their are MULTIPLE artist at WP:GA that have their Grammy winnings listed at the top and Beyoncé happens to be one. I also went back on your Cardi B "Latin artist" comment as well? She is a Latin woman, her first language is not English (she can barely speak it without you hearing her native accent), half of the people in her family doesn't speak English either, she has topped Latin billboard charts multiple times with various non English speaking Latin songs. So I'm trying to see what's the issue? VerifiedFixes (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
GAFFA Awards of Sweden, of Norway and Denmark
Could you update Cardi's page of Awards?
List of 2019 GAFFA Swedish Awards Winners: https://gaffa.se/nyhet/135591/de-vann-gaffa-priset-2019/ List of 2018 GAFFA Norwegian Awards Winners: https://gaffa.no/musikk/nyheter/197197/gaffa-prisen-2018-her-er-alle-vinnerne/ List of 2019 GAFFA Denmark Awards Nominations: https://gaffa.dk/nyhed/134918/gaffa-prisen-2019-og-de-nominerede-er — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.233.8.198 (talk) 11:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Hope you return
Are you going to return? You're a great editor. 183.171.114.126 (talk) 03:57, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Orphaned non-free image File:Taki Taki (Official Single Cover) - DJ Snake.png
Thanks for uploading File:Taki Taki (Official Single Cover) - DJ Snake.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Beyonce awards page
Hi. I came here to remind you that not because you're not familiar with an award, that's invalid. I put all sources on Beyonce awards page and some artists page includes those awards for so long and they are not deleted. I hope you won't delete the awards again. Thank you
- Give WP:Indiscriminate a read. This isn't your blog... Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, this is NOT YOUR BLOG. Stop deleting awards. Again, just because your not familiar with an award, it's invalid. You deleted Waco Theater Award, Fragrance awards with valid sources. Also, VEVO Certified is an award, not just a certification until 2016. I already excluded magazine honors she got and included it on her "other honors", I hope it won't deleted anymore. Regards
- Vevo certified aren't awards, are certifications. Like RIAA Gold and Platinum Program, and like they used to give for radio spins.
- Non-notable organizations..that don't even have a page here. Did you read the article I linked? Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- VEVO are legit awards, they are giving artists who reached 100 Million Views trophy way back until they ended in 2016. Non-notable organizations that don't even have a page here? - not everything is on Wikipedia honey, one of the national hero of my country doesn't have a page here, does that make him not a hero since he don't have a page here? Same with those organizations, they legit giving awards but since they don't have a page here, they are fake?
"not everything is on Wikipedia honey"
- Yes...because you're in WP right now. It's literally a guideline. Did you even read the guideline I linked? If you want to post non-notable awards do it in your fan blog or whatever. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 02:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
List of awards and nominations received by Britney Spears
Hi! I'm the lead editor of that page. Thank You for your contribution to the List of awards and nominations received by Britney Spears, I really appreciate it. However, based on what I saw in the previous, you have deleted a lot of awards that you said it doesn't. First of all, you deleted Hollywood Beauty Awards which is when she was received that award in 2018, she got attention from all especially the media because she is the first female artist to received that award. [1]. Then you deleted Vevo Certified Awards which the award is not held by the ceremony but by giving awards through a video uploaded on youtube. Thirdly, you deleted FHM 100 sexiest women; the award is held every year (1995 - 2016), maybe it looks like such a poll but it doesn't because they will give 100 trophies to all the women on the list. Fourth, CDDB isn't an award but it's like a computer database, in 1999 CDDB honored Britney Spears because her lead single is Most Played Single on computers but it's still an honor so why not if I add that award to the list. 80% of all awards that you deleted is really the award is held every year and I can give you any proof, maybe there are some isn't an award but it's still a honor which is they have a small event like Las Vegas, Barbie and more. I hope you making some research before deleting those awards. Johhnyfrankie13 (talk) 04:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- WP:Indiscriminate non-notable organizations shouldn't be here at all.
- what even is Hollywood Beauty? doesn't have a page here.
- Vevo certified aren't awards.
Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is another sources for Vevo Certified Awards [2] and she really received it, the problem is just the page of those awards isn't create yet. Johhnyfrankie13 (talk) 05:40, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Vevo certified aren't awards, are certifications. Like RIAA Gold and Platinum Program, and like they used to give for radio spins. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- You also deleted M6 Awards, she really received those and the awards are notable but maybe the sources are weak. Then, you deleted BMI Film & TV Awards in Best Original Song categories for "Follow Me" which the song was sung by Jamie Lynn Spears for the theme song of Zoey 101, the reason I put in the list because the song was written and produced by Britney Spears so I think when someone wrote the song, several awards like Academy, Ivor included BMI the award totally belongs to them. Johhnyfrankie13 (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Now the BMI Awards.. BMI and ASCAP (an artist can be signed only to one) list the winners under "songwriters" column. They pick who they award. Not there, not a winner. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
This is your second time deleted this, I stayed up all night to make a new list which is I removed a lot of awards and add all the reliable sources, some organizations like the City of Kentwood, it's all based on what written inside the book. You have no idea how tired I am to making all of this in just 2 days, I know in Wikipedia isn't about tired or what but I've made all of this for 6 months. First, when Britney received the BMI Film & TV Awards, the instructions are still not implemented so that's mean the award belongs to her. Second, bunch of awards like Bizarre and more you said the awards are non-notable which is if you go to the sources you clearly can see a speech of Spears received those awards that you said non-notable and more like fake awards. Make some research dude before you delete that if this time you want to delete again, go to the talk page and we can discuss what award that I should delete and shouldn't, Thankyou. Johhnyfrankie13 (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
I'll list them one by one:
- EVMA Awards (non notable)
- Fragrantica Choice Awards (non notable)
- FR2 Touch Awards (non notable)
- Groovevolt Music Fashion Awards (non notable)
- Hammond Square Mall (non notable)
- Hollywood Beauty Awards (non notable)
- Imperio Music Awards (non notable)
- Package Printing Excellence Award (non notable)
- Perfumed Plume Awards (non notable)
- Silver State Awards (non notable)
- MVPA Awards (non notable)
They all don't even have a page on Wikipedia
Then you came up with stuff like:
- Official Number 1 Awards (it means a number one..on the UK charts, not an award)
- Staples Center
- The Walt Disney Company
- CDDB (Compact Disc Database??)
Then, awards for the songwriters listed in the list of winners, redundant but you didn't read the first time. She's not listed, plus a BMI artist does not even receive an ASCAP award, and the other way around
- ASCAP
- BMI
And lists (non awards) like:
- Sony Music reporting sales
- Vevo (not even the number one video so a lie either way)
- Time Person of the Year...doesn't even have nominations: they have a symbolic public poll but the winners are chosen by experts
Finally, certifications that aren't awards...but certifications, just like RIAA
- Vevo certified (for videos)
- BDS (for radio spins)
And beauty lists..also Non-awards
- AskMen "Awards"
- FHM "Awards"
Just becase you add the word "award" doesn't mean those list turn into awards..
Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
References
Beyoncé's awards, again
All awards listed on the page are referenced. Your personal opinion as to whether they are "non-notable" is irrelevant, and the fact that you have repeatedly deleted up to 50k characters on every edit is highly suspicious, especially considering you have removed Ariana Grande's Spotify records from the 7 Rings page - you seem to have a bias against certain musicians. If you think an award is fake, remove it, or mention it in the talk page. If you think an award is "non-notable," it doesn't matter. It's an award, and therefore belongs in a List of Awards.
- Well, don't even remember doing that on 7 Rings, and if I did it I surelly put a reason on the summary. And no..it's not my personal opinion...it's all WP:Indiscriminate is about. A guideline, not a hard concept. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- The references are generally unreliable and all the "awards" that keep getting added are non-notable. Stop doing this or you will be blocked. Guy (help!) 21:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Just because Wikipedia is non-exhaustive, doesn't mean you should delete information. If you think a reference is unreliable, unnecessarily removing information is not the answer. Many of the awards you have removed are perfectly well-referenced, such as the Trumpet Award, but you decided it was non-notable. I don't know why it's so difficult for you to understand that YOU thinking an award is "non-notable" does not mean you should remove it from a LIST OF AWARDS. This is a joke. If you are bothered by the page, titled "List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé", being a list of awards and nominations rather than a list of awards you have decided are notable, leave it alone... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dagicle (talk • contribs) 11:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé. MrClog (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dua Lipa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Future Nostalgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Awards of Destiny's Child
I noticed that you deleted tons of awards from Destiny's Child. You recently deleted tons from Beyonce's and now from Destiny's Child. All awards there are with valid link but are deleted because they are non-notable? You are abusing the system. The issue with you deleting most awards from Beyonce is not over yet, you came to another with Destiny's Child.
EdJohnston (talk) Please look at the activity of this user, he kept on mass deleting awards even though the dispute with him deleting Beyonce awards is not yet over. Thank you Beyhiveboys (Beyhiveboys) 09:54, 04 April 2020 (UTC) He Hate RobloxCity_DEV
Britney Spears
- Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by BTS/archive1
- Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Kylie Minogue/archive1
- List of awards and nominations received by BTS
- List of awards and nominations received by Taylor Swift
- List of awards and nominations received by Kylie Minogue
SO WHY THEM ADD A NOTE AND DIDN'T GOT DELETE AND JUST GOT A FEATURED LIST THREE DAYS AGO. Johhnyfrankie13 (talk) 23:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- In Swift's article all the awards are notable, no notes. BTS depends if those five awards have articles in Korean, if not they will be removed. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- This thing isn't even a big but the way you messed up is really offensive me, even you're people who are experienced in Wikipedia but the way you deleted every award to Beyonce page and others is very unprofessional; clearly I just do the same thing list the others nominator who got featured list does & I wanna hear this from the reviewers and not you so. Johhnyfrankie13 (talk) 00:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- And all the non-notable awards in BTS literally don't have articles in Korean and others language. Johhnyfrankie13 (talk) 00:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Experienced users already answered that Talk:List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Beyoncé#Proposed_restoration. Non-notable awards should not be listed. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Billie Eilish. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Motivation by Normani
Hey, you removed “critical acclaim” from the lead because you believe hypebeast and popbuzz are unreliable sources. Can you tell me why? Kanyfug (talk) 21:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Unknown websites. Use one of these Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Reverting edits on Shawn Mendes
I noticed that you reverted an edit which cites that Shawn mendes has been inspired by Taylor swift,this incorrect fact is even mentioned in Swift's Page under the impact section with the same source as the reference.I suggest you to look into this. Jennythute678 (talk) 04:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Edit:In that impact section I even don't see artists such as Niall Horan,Finneas,Kelsea Ballerini,Camila Cabello or Chainsmokers citing Swift directly as a musical inspiration according to the respective references given,I suggest you to have a look since you seem to be experienced when it comes to these sort of cases. Jennythute678 (talk) 14:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- I did double check them. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Why do you keep changing facts about Beyoncé/ Nicki Minaj? Don’t you have anything better to do?
Why do you keep changing facts about Beyoncé/ Nicki Minaj? Don’t you have anything better to do? Excivus (talk) 16:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- You re-added something that was already discussed on the Talk page. That's the research you should be doing. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Unordered
Can you please not remove content from Harry Styles' page? Your actions are unnecessary and affect the meaning of the "Treat People with Kindness section". I wrote this section and it's disappointing to see you and others removing important parts for no obvious reason. It puts me off adding an update. I see other people have made similar comments regarding your editing of other pages too. Thank you. User: Dora's Ice Lolly.
Dora's ice lolly (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Dora's ice lolly: You should post at the bottom. Not at the top. 2402:1980:8305:99CD:F00D:4D55:5E0C:CCAD (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Why are you deleting everything from ariana's front page? can u please readd, that her first three albums are certified platinum. i don't know why you deleting everything.
- You should post at the bottom. Not at the top. 2402:1980:244:1E3:449F:167D:A66C:7C67 (talk) 07:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Can you stop removing facts from 7 Rings? It IS the sixth most streamed in a day based on Spotify Charts. Compare her streams using that to everyone else in the kost streamed in a day list and she will be placed on the sixth rank. Do you not do research? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.10.141.67 (talk) 08:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- You should post at the bottom. Not at the top. 2402:1980:246:3413:7C44:421E:5965:F1B7 (talk) 10:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey can you please stop deleting things? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.184.250 (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Legacy vs Impact
I don't think you understand what a legacy is. Artists like Mariah Carey have legacies but artists Lil Kim who isn't even worldwide famous should not have a legacy. You only do it because of your bias against Nicki Minaj so stop being bias and changing facts and information about these artists. From the comments on your talk page, you're just coming across as salty and bias so don't be surprised if someone reports you soon. Maxwell King123321 (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Fans write all the time an there's been many reports. It always end up with them finally getting to know the guidelines. All easy to find. I don't see the bias. So avoid using "don't be surprised" as WP:INTIMIDATION.
- Per Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary, "Legacy" means a) something that is a result of events in the past, and b) a situation that has developed as a result of past actions and decisions.
- Totally regardlessly of the person being "worldwide famous" or not.
- Let me elaborate so you can get familiar:
- Changing the landscape of music videos' themes and being credited for it by multiple sources; changing the discourse of the portrayal of a female performer and being credited for it by multiple sources; the "standard" for a generation of teen pop stars seeking credibility and being credited for it by multiple sources. Examples of legacy.
- Success and its data is not Legacy.
- Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Here we go again
- Did you read yet the Billboard magazine that provided?[1]
- Music Video Production Association Awards meets the Awards/accolades criteria which is demonstrably notable
- "There's no policy that states that an award only qualifies as notable if it has a Wikipedia page. The editors who worked on this page selected the awards based on if the award show would meet WP:GNG and WP:ORG, or that the win and the award show were covered by multiple reliable sources. This is especially the case with BTS as most of their awards are Korean and would be less likely to have an English Wikipedia page. All of these awards have major, notable orangizations that back them up, such as the Journalists Association of Korea, Recording Industry Association of Korea and the Korea Music Copyright Association. To say that an award show established by two major Korean music associations fails notability because the awards show doesn't have a Wikipedia presence seems ludicrous to me. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 03:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC) - I wonder too why you didn't reply to that message if you wanted to say you were right and why don't you delete all the non-notable awards in the BTS article without discussion and others if you're right!!?. Saiff Naqiuddin (talk) 02:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Top 10th Annual Awards Festivities". Billboard. 111 (51): 96. December 18, 1999. ISSN 0006-2510.
- Why did you change your name? lol, well..
- I'm struggling too see in what part of that source it says she won that. Considering a number of award "wins" on this article that you added were blantaly false Idk what to believe... Except the Official Source that I provided you several times where it says she has only won seven. Billboard also said she had won six before the Millennial Award happened. And stop adding non-notable awards to inflate the number of wins.. how did you demonstrate it is notable.. if that article is created it would instantly go Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pop_Corn_Music_Awards because those are not notable at all.
- I'm just reading that reply btw Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Guild of Music Supervisors Awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Niche award with no assertion of notability. All references are churnalism reporting on press releases.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Hollywood Music in Media Awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Niche award with no assertion of notability. All references are churnalism reporting on press releases.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Hollywood Music in Media Awards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hollywood Music in Media Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Music in Media Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Guild of Music Supervisors Awards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guild of Music Supervisors Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guild of Music Supervisors Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Mmh
Hi! Do you have a problem with me? I know that i'm not the best editor, but I really try my best. I'm still really new here, and i'm always ready to learn a couple of things. I know that my edits on the Ariana Grande page are a bit too much, that's why i'm trying to slow down. All the best. xx Mirrored7 (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Mood Ring
It's worth mentioning in the article because there is tons of media attention about it because of the fact that it went number one. I'm still working on adding all of that information. Billboard did a whole article with the writers because of it. — Status (talk · contribs) 22:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Britney Spears, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Karlsson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doja Cat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Say So (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Vmas 2019
I want to genuinely know what biased you have against Normani. It’s clearly targeted and I’m gonna have to report your account for edit warring soon. It makes no sense to use rolling stone as a reference when I listed two/three notable publications that named lizzo Normani and missy as the highlights. But you went Out of your way to find an article that doesn’t mention her to use as reference. I even shorted the mention of her on the page just for you to keep deleting the whole thing. Once again if a performance is getting called the best performance of the YEAR, not just of that show, it’s notable. But I’m willing to hear you out to see if you have a good reason for removing my whole edit that I worked hard on. Kanyfug (talk) 22:14, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Kanyfug: What you're posting there is: A performance happened, a review was given, and an award. This applies to all the performances and awards. Therefore, all the 'well received' performances and awards would go there? The section is called Notable moments. Check the Rolling Stone summary of the show for notability. That review of "best performance of the year" fits in the song's article, where it belongs, not here. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Beyoncé
Hey! I constantly see you in my watchlist. Thanks for keeping articles with accuracy or neutrality, or at least trying. Maybe, you can check Beyoncé's main article. In my point of view, this article is overly detailed. Just see for example "Achievements", "Public image" or "Legacy" section. Lists of lists and lists: "best track of the 2000s, the most sexiest/hottest"... Unnecesary name-droppings (Drake's song example) and so on. Allmost all these things could easily transferred to their respective articles. A few months ago, I've left a message with my concern specially since this article is supported by a wikiproject, but nobody replied. Maybe, i'm wrong, or maybe not. If you wanna and have a time, you can check out. It's not a matter if you're fan or not, this is an encyclopedia not a fansite and the current version of that article, seems have failed many points of an actual GA article. Thanks in advance, and no problem if you don't wanna/have time. Cheers, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 00:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'd eventually. It's a lot tho. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Not a problem. And maybe you may give your opinion here. Regards, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Honorific nicknames in popular music
This inquiry is on your recent edits on the above mentioned page. What is the requirement of multiple sources to confirm one entry in the article?. If required then you will have to remove more than half of the entries of the article. Reevaluate your edits if done by mistake or if you are correct then please continue to remove all other entries without multiple sources(which make up more than half of the page). Thank you. Jennythute678 (talk) 01:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Talk:Honorific_nicknames_in_popular_music#Rules Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
List of honorific nicknames in pop music
If you have the time, could you review the sources I left here re: Paula Abdul and lmk what you think? These were the most promising ones I found during my initial search. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 04:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Annvarie (talk) 01:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
AshMusique (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
WAP
article clearly has a liberal bias. every conservative point has a rebuke offered whereas the liberal one is simply regarded 'as critical acclaim' without any rebuke. it is not vandalism to remove this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.70.26 (talk) 01:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cardi B, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elle.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Hey! Can I ask why you keep making disruptive edits to the Savage article? Like I get that you're a big Cardi B fan (as am I) but I'm not sure why repeatedly moving material into the wrong subsections or removing material from another female rapper's article helps your cause. Thank you Bgkc4444 (talk) 16:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Bgkc4444
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha>
tags or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template or {{notelist}}
template (see the help page).