CordialGreenery (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
GoldenRing (talk | contribs) ds alert Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:::::::Are you saying you did read the notices? Then why did you continue to edit war? And why are you now removing the non-template message I left you instead as "not important"? This is troublesome behaviour. <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User_talk:Bradv|Brad''v'']]</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bradv|<span style="color:red">🍁</span>]] 05:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC) |
:::::::Are you saying you did read the notices? Then why did you continue to edit war? And why are you now removing the non-template message I left you instead as "not important"? This is troublesome behaviour. <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User_talk:Bradv|Brad''v'']]</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bradv|<span style="color:red">🍁</span>]] 05:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
::::::::Thank you for your input. I'd like to continue the discussion over at the [[BAMN]] talk page. [[User:CordialGreenery|CordialGreenery]] ([[User talk:CordialGreenery#top|talk]]) 05:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC) |
::::::::Thank you for your input. I'd like to continue the discussion over at the [[BAMN]] talk page. [[User:CordialGreenery|CordialGreenery]] ([[User talk:CordialGreenery#top|talk]]) 05:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Discretionary sanctions alert == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[WP:AC/DS#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[WP:AC/DS#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[WP:AC/DS#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[WP:ArbCom|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
As the notice says, this is just a notice to let you know that extra editing restrictions are in force for post-1932 American politics and related people. I do note, however, that you have made at least four reverts today at [[BAMN]], breaking even the normal 3RR rule. Go careful. [[User:GoldenRing|GoldenRing]] ([[User talk:GoldenRing|talk]]) 11:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:08, 22 January 2019
Welcome!
Hello, CordialGreenery, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Delme Bryn-Jones. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rekonedth (talk) 07:53, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Just a heads up
Hey just stopping by to say be careful, try and focus on the content for the articles and how sources support them. It is nothing but trouble when focusing on users per WP:PERSONAL. Also watch that WP:3RR bright line.
That said I think there is a case to be made for changing it to far-left and expanding the body for the militant stuff and violence they do. Lets see what we can come up with on the talk page. PackMecEng (talk) 05:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. See you on the talk page. CordialGreenery (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CordialGreenery reported by User:Bradv (Result: ). Thank you. Bradv🍁 05:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Just went back to self-revert, saw that you did it for me. Let's work this out on the talk pageCordialGreenery (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- You do realize that if you're blocked for edit warring you won't actually be able to discuss this on the talk page, right? Bradv🍁 05:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Is that what you want? CordialGreenery (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- What I want is for editors to use talk pages to discuss things, and not to edit war. You may have a point to your edits, but there's not much point in discussing them if you're just going to keep changing the article back to your preferred version. If you had taken the BRD approach instead, you would be able to participate in the discussion. Also, please don't blank templates without reading them - they contain valuable information and advice. Bradv🍁 05:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- If that's what you want, than participate on the talk page that I created for discussing this. Instead of templating me and pretending I didn't read it before blanking it. CordialGreenery (talk) 05:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Are you saying you did read the notices? Then why did you continue to edit war? And why are you now removing the non-template message I left you instead as "not important"? This is troublesome behaviour. Bradv🍁 05:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your input. I'd like to continue the discussion over at the BAMN talk page. CordialGreenery (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Are you saying you did read the notices? Then why did you continue to edit war? And why are you now removing the non-template message I left you instead as "not important"? This is troublesome behaviour. Bradv🍁 05:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- If that's what you want, than participate on the talk page that I created for discussing this. Instead of templating me and pretending I didn't read it before blanking it. CordialGreenery (talk) 05:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- What I want is for editors to use talk pages to discuss things, and not to edit war. You may have a point to your edits, but there's not much point in discussing them if you're just going to keep changing the article back to your preferred version. If you had taken the BRD approach instead, you would be able to participate in the discussion. Also, please don't blank templates without reading them - they contain valuable information and advice. Bradv🍁 05:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Is that what you want? CordialGreenery (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- You do realize that if you're blocked for edit warring you won't actually be able to discuss this on the talk page, right? Bradv🍁 05:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Just went back to self-revert, saw that you did it for me. Let's work this out on the talk pageCordialGreenery (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
As the notice says, this is just a notice to let you know that extra editing restrictions are in force for post-1932 American politics and related people. I do note, however, that you have made at least four reverts today at BAMN, breaking even the normal 3RR rule. Go careful. GoldenRing (talk) 11:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)