No edit summary |
Olaf Stephanos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
== Straw Poll == |
== Straw Poll == |
||
Hi, you were involved in the discussion at [[Talk:Ron Paul]]. A straw poll is currently being conducted to discern concensus.[[User:Chhe|Chhe]] ([[User talk:Chhe|talk]]) 13:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, you were involved in the discussion at [[Talk:Ron Paul]]. A straw poll is currently being conducted to discern concensus.[[User:Chhe|Chhe]] ([[User talk:Chhe|talk]]) 13:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Arbitration Enforcement Amendment == |
|||
Hello, I leave this message to inform you that I am seeking amendment and an ArbCom review of the sanction imposed by administrator [[User:Shell Kinney]]. <font color="green">'''✔</font> [[User:Olaf Stephanos|Olaf Stephanos]]''' <font color="darksalmon" size="+1">[[User_talk:Olaf Stephanos|✍]]</font> 18:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:11, 10 August 2009
please post new messages on the bottom of page
Welcome, my reply times will be slower than before, but I will still check this page occasionally.
Sources
Like I hope you have some sources/references for the mainland China article. You are adding alot. Benjwong (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- It looks "right enough". Except it is lacking sources even more than before. I thought we repaired that article at one time to clean out the tags. Now the tags have come back. Benjwong (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Wen Jiabao
Please check my talk page. Arilang talk 06:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
NPC 2009
Hi Colipon, thank you for your comments. I would love to contribute to NPC 2009. However, I am still trying to read the news and digest what the government intends to do in 2009. I will contribute when I do see something I can. Hope you have a good day.--Visik (talk) 11:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Yu Quan (pop duet)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yu Quan (pop duet), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tedder (talk) 06:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Was there a reason for this removal of the Pinyin pronunciation? I thought it might have been an accident, but in case there was a legitimate concern, you should know I restored it because the page was displaying {{P}}. Recognizance (talk) 02:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Request for help
I thought it might be a good idea to run a contest or two through the Countries WikiProject to attract editors to improve country coverage on Wikipedia, especially the country outlines.
I noticed you are a member of the WikiProject, and was wondering if you could help.
I've posted a message at Countries WikiProject talk page to get discussion started on what the awards programs should be and how they should be run.
Your ideas and feedback would be greatly appreciated.
The Transhumanist 23:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Deng Funeral.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Deng Funeral.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
The agenda
Please fill me in .--Asdfg12345 04:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Don't worry about ChinaHistorian; he is a useless editor and will soon be blocked for a long time. I can't block him myself because of my role in the dispute, but I will report him at WP:AN3 very soon (I just have to run a quick errand first) and then he will be blocked quickly; his violation of the image use rules, edit warring rules, and civility rules is so blatant that no admin in their right mind would hesitate to take away his editing privileges. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 00:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- He's blocked now, albeit only for 24 hours. We'll have to keep an eye out for things to start up again at this time tomorrow night... rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 02:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Ürümqi Barn"star" | ||
Thanks for all your work maintaining the article July 2009 Ürümqi riots during its time on the main page. This has been a difficult and thankless task, working at a frenetic pace for 4 days straight so far (I, for one, have been getting very little sleep), and it's only been thanks to coordinated efforts and discussion from numerous editors that the article has been kept as neutral and informative as possible. This is the most collaboration I've done, with the largest number of editors once, since I have joined Wikipedia, and I think the results are showing; while it's not perfect, when my friends and family ask me about what's going on in Urumqi, I have been more comfortable recommending this article than any other source. The work is far from over, but now that this article is off the main page I think it's finally time to thank the editors Seb az86556, Colipon, Jim101, Ohconfucius, Benlisquare, Simonm223, and Jinhuili for all their contributions; while we had disagreements, I think each of these editors has been particularly active and has made real efforts to improve the article.rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 20:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC) |
Ürümqi riots
Hi thanks for that! :) I've only just seen your comment from a while back, I apologise for not replying sooner - I should check my talk page more. Anyway, I'm quite happy with the background section as it stands, the article has come along well. Midway (talk) 01:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Aircraft accident question
Hi, I saw your comment about "a local Continental aircraft suffering decompression" on the deletion debate for the aircraft accidents templates. Were you referring to Southwest Airlines Flight 2294 by any chance? That incident was a structural failure of the airframe, and thus notable. Mjroots (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
State Councilor
Howdy! Thanks for your work on the article. I was wondering if you have any details on previous State Councilors. Perhaps you can create a history of them similar to the Premier or Vice-Premier articles. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poliphile (talk • contribs) 02:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Academic views on Falun Gong
Hi Colipon! Academic views on Falun Gong is currently up for an AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic views on Falun Gong (2nd nomination). I noticed your comments on the talk page. Would you please give your view on the AFD discussion. It was relisted to "generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached".--Edward130603 (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
FLG disputes
Do it's more productive to move the discussion to formal mediation or arbitration?--PCPP (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Is there any reason why don't you have email enabled, dude? Ohconfucius (talk) 01:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
JSTOR
I think uploading the files would actually be a copyright violation in a lot of cases. What you can be done is to go to their website and see which articles you want, let me know their titles and I can then e-mail copies of them to you. But if I were you I would ignore the book reviews, because like I said I've already printed out all of those for my own early reviews. I don't doubt that they are somewhat useful, but they probably aren't the best sources of information in and of themselves.
Hi
I'm here now. Do you still need me?--Edward130603 (talk) 15:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Have you asked PCPP yet?--Edward130603 (talk) 16:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Colipon, I like how the page is going. If I get a chance, I might give some input in the other editors section. Also, see if PCPP, Ohconfucius, Bobby Fletcher, PerEdman, and Mrund have any diffs/comments to provide.--Edward130603 (talk) 17:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Falun Gong Workgroup
Colipon, would you like to add yourself to the list of participants?--Edward130603 (talk) 22:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- It would help to have as many of the parties who do deal with the content listed there as possible, if for no other reason than to make it easier to know who to contact if questions arise regarding something or other that they might not have seen. John Carter (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
btw...
this is surreal.. the IP who wants to push the Photo-controversy at length into the Rebiya Kadeer- article just sent me a vandalism level 1 warning for reverting it. just letting you know... this one's aggressive... Seb az86556 (talk) 06:06, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- thanks ;) Seb az86556 (talk) 06:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
I was naive
Falun Gong... we should re-name the article "hornet's nest"... what on earth is going on? Seb az86556 (talk) 19:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Interesting reading... Here's my main problem: Does wikipedia have a policy against filibustering? The tactic seems to be to claim "no changes before consensus" and then keep the discussion going ad infinitum so that no consensus will ever be there and thus no changes will ever be made... is filibustering allowed on wiki? Seb az86556 (talk) 19:54, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Filibustering? It is somebody else who's "filibustering" here, considering that in controversial cases, the community supports what is said in WP:Criticism: "Criticism is most commonly taken to mean negative evaluation, but actually includes positive and negative evaluation. Despite this, it is recommended that in article headings one uses the title "Reception" to indicate criticism sections." I take this to mean that if the 'Criticism' title is disputed, especially when the article is going to be renamed anyway, "Reception" is the best alternative. What is your interpretation of these exact words? ✔ Olaf Stephanos ✍ 20:12, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
*poke*
[1] <-- two of these are actually re-directs. Seb az86556 (talk) 04:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- not sure what you mean... did I make a mistake? if so, mind helping me fix it? :) Colipon+(Talk) 04:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- just get rid of two of'em.. they all lead to the same page... or did you want to link to three different pages?Seb az86556 (talk) 04:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Straw Poll
Hi, you were involved in the discussion at Talk:Ron Paul. A straw poll is currently being conducted to discern concensus.Chhe (talk) 13:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration Enforcement Amendment
Hello, I leave this message to inform you that I am seeking amendment and an ArbCom review of the sanction imposed by administrator User:Shell Kinney. ✔ Olaf Stephanos ✍ 18:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)