Chrisjnelson (talk | contribs) |
Luna Santin (talk | contribs) →Jmfangio: warn |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
:::Well I just feel he's a whiny baby and I didn't feel like keeping my mouth shut at the time.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #005e6a">Nelson</span>]]''' 06:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC) |
:::Well I just feel he's a whiny baby and I didn't feel like keeping my mouth shut at the time.►'''[[User:Chrisjnelson|<span style="color: #005e6a">Chris </span><span style="color: #005e6a">Nelson</span>]]''' 06:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
::::You're one snippety comment away from being blocked, FYI. Keep it off-wiki. – <span style="font-family: Garamond">[[User:Luna Santin|<font color="#1E90FF">'''Luna Santin'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Luna Santin|talk]])</span> 06:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:21, 15 August 2007
Jmfangio's disruptive behavior
Hey there. This is a comment I'm leaving in response to Jmfangio's disruptive behavior on either Talk:Peyton Manning or Talk:Brett Favre. I would appreciate it if you could go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive behavior and help solve this situation; whatever assistance you can provide is quite helpful. If you choose not to be a part of this, then that would be perfectly fine, as well. Thank you. Ksy92003(talk) 17:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
NFL template
For all of our sakes, could I ask that you please just don't revert Jmfangio again? It's not worth getting blocked for. Ksy92003(talk) 22:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
RFC
I just thought I'd let you know I think Jmfangio's WP:RFC on you is a little ridiculous. As far as I can tell, there's no reason the RFC should exist. Yes, you've both been a little... shall we say, unrelenting in your debates and arguments, but there's no reason this RFC should even have been made. Wlmaltby3 – talk/contribs 23:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Template talk
Not ignoring you, just giving someone else perhaps the opportunity to chime in. Please do not hesitate to open a couple of discussions, I will let you know if i'm having a hard time following them. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 00:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- I will not open up any other discussions any time soon because this is the only issue I'm really interested in right now. Really, I think my edit is totally satisfactory and I'm not sure what anyone would have against it. I will probably implement it within the next day or as long as discussions are not still ongoing and no one else proposes a better solution. I'm not set on THIS edit being the fix for undrafted free agents, but I'd like something to be done and I'm not sure what better way to do it there is out there.►Chris Nelson 00:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
If arbitration doesn't get accepted
Chris, I'd like to reopen the article to contributions. If the requested arbitration doesn't open I'm contemplating seeking some type of community based sanction on both you and JMfangio to contain the dispute so other editors can participate.
I'm posting to both of your talk pages for input on what would be best. Our options are limited and crude. Your input is welcome. Whatever the solution, it'll apply equally for the two of you:
- Topic ban both of you from football articles until the Superbowl (this can be lifted if you settle your differences).
- Limit you both to one edit and one article talk post per day, per football-related article. Duration would be the same as above: Superbowl or resolution of the dispute.
- Place both of you on civility parole. That would apply throughout Wikipedia and have the same duration.
- Some other solution that you and/or JM suggest and both agree is reasonable.
DurovaCharge! 01:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- What are you talking about?►Chris Nelson 01:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I've protected Peyton Manning for a week because of your dispute. Nobody but an administrator can edit the page right now. As we get closer to regular season full page protections wouldn't be fair to all the other editors. I hope you can both turn down the heat enough so that no action is needed. In case the arbitration committee sends you back to dispute resolution and the edit warring resumes I'd like to pursue a solution to contain the dispute. The usual solution is to apply userblocks when disruption occurs. Nobody enjoys that. So I've been brainstorming alternatives that could:
- Let you both continue dispute resolution without interruption.
- Keep the articles stable and available to other editors, without cluttering the talk pages with two people's differences.
- Motivate both of you to settle your differences.
- Do those things sound like goals you share? DurovaCharge! 03:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I've protected Peyton Manning for a week because of your dispute. Nobody but an administrator can edit the page right now. As we get closer to regular season full page protections wouldn't be fair to all the other editors. I hope you can both turn down the heat enough so that no action is needed. In case the arbitration committee sends you back to dispute resolution and the edit warring resumes I'd like to pursue a solution to contain the dispute. The usual solution is to apply userblocks when disruption occurs. Nobody enjoys that. So I've been brainstorming alternatives that could:
We're good right now I think.►Chris Nelson 03:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Just responded, playing a half of madden and then going to get the game. I'm going to be around later and then i'm checking out for a day for vacation. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 03:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Now there is something we have in common!►Chris Nelson 03:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't edit your comments, in your impatience to let me put mine back in the right place, an edit conflict broke out that made it appear as if you had removed your previous statement. That's why it was put back in, but struck - for you. Why you can't assume good faith is beyond me. We're right back where we started and I'm back to holding off conversations with you until the RFCs are in place. As you are welcome to bring things up for discussion, if we are unable to agree on something, then please respect that until some process is brought in. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 10:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- I don't like lines through my comments. Lines raped my mother.►Chris Nelson 10:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Joke.►Chris Nelson 16:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Ernie Whitt's nationality
See the Jays roster template talk page for a note on my edit that you undid. --Oeuftete88 21:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Please...
I'm trying to keep out of this situation, but I can't any longer... Chrisjnelson, please try to refrain yourself from talking with Jmfangio. The conversation you're having with him isn't helping things out at all; it was the potential to make this incident really ugly, and you're likely to cause more harm than good. Ksy92003(talk) 06:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oh well.►Chris Nelson 06:18, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Jmfangio
Is there any point in kicking him on his talk page while he is blocked? I saw the thread on ANI and haven't tried to figure out what the dispute is over someone copying/pasting talk page comments, but WADR your comments on his talk page aren't helpful. --B 06:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kicking him while he's blocked? That doesn't even make sense, considering he can post there.►Chris Nelson 06:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kicking xxx while he/she is down is just an expression. --B 06:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Well I just feel he's a whiny baby and I didn't feel like keeping my mouth shut at the time.►Chris Nelson 06:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- You're one snippety comment away from being blocked, FYI. Keep it off-wiki. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)