No edit summary |
|||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
:The block was reasonable. There is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Chooserr again]], you can post your opinions there if you wish. -- [[User:Curps|Curps]] 07:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC) |
:The block was reasonable. There is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Chooserr again]], you can post your opinions there if you wish. -- [[User:Curps|Curps]] 07:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
==Username block?== |
|||
Do you even have the authority to block some one?--[[User:The Devil Made Me do IT|The Devil Made Me do IT]] 07:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:11, 10 December 2005
ADCEBCBCE
I admire your resolve, but like my dad used to ask, "Is this the hill you want to die on?" (not his original, but that's not the point.)
The point is that there is a lot more that you can do to contribute without getting yourself blocked. Anyway, take my advice or leave it. I just hope you consider it. --Elliskev 00:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- That's good to hear. New start? Godspeed. --Elliskev 00:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Stop creating POV forks on religion themed articles
Thanks--Aolanonawanabe 01:14, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Whoa! That's fast!
Thanks for the welcome. I hadn't even been logged in for 5 minutes! -- Megamix 01:20, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Welcoming
I think it's a wonderful thing. It certainly isn't spamming. Carry on :-) --HappyCamper 01:55, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's certainly not spamming. A lot of Wikipedians do it. I do it myself. One thing I'm careful to do is to check the contributions of the new user just to make sure that he or she is a genuine editor and not a vandal. AnnH (talk) 02:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Funny
I was accused of being a sockpuppet. Hopefully that guy'll stop stalking you though. He is correct in that your articles seem to be a bit short (though that doesn't excuse his snide remarks)... try making them more complete. JG of Borg 03:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
- Make sure you do, otherwise you're just giving him ammo, with good reason. Have fun! JG of Borg 03:47, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Images
Image:PLL.gif Image:PLI.gif were uploaded to use in the table for that quote. The quote was deleted. It's not really proper to do things that way and they are not fair use in that case. Fair use is only acceptable in some articles and that would not constitute. May I delete them? We can't assume it's GFDL if you got it from the BBC (and you would need to show where from the BBS) gren グレン 04:15, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Welcome New Users
Thanks for welcoming the newcomers! Just one thing to take not of is whether or not they have contributed something before you add to their talk page. I see the template you use states, "thank you for your contributions". Maybe replace that line with something else. Thanks! mdmanser 04:44, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Pro-Life Alliance
Thanks for your message. Although I am not a Roman Catholic (I am actually a Polytheist, but having a lot of respect for His Holiness the Pope Benedict XVI), :o) I just gave my opinion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-Life Alliance, only with a few words... Hégésippe | ±Θ± 10:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Catholic Science Fiction
Hi, Chooserr, you might be interested in this link I'm compiling at my blog:Catholicism in Science Fiction Speculative catholic 03:43, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Curps
My IP (71.129.72.3) has been blocked. I'm not sure why and would like it unblocked for to the best of my knowledge I haven't done anything wrong lately. Thank you, Chooserr
11
Stop spamming the Recent Pages page. Take it to the mailing list. User:Zoe|(talk) 05:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
if you DO NOT STOP, your block will be extended. User:Zoe|(talk) 06:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
I've unprotected your page. If you continue, you will be blocked for a week and the page reprotected. User:Zoe|(talk) 06:26, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Block
We had a couple of disruptive users/vandals just minutes before you that were rapidly adding a flurry of welcome messages to new user pages and were using that to disguise some bad edits (bogus "you've been blocked messages" etc). See Polysciwantacracker (talk · contribs) and You got that right mister (talk · contribs). I saw an anon IP doing the same thing, and what's more it was signing its edits with your username, and so I believed it was part of the same trend. Sorry if you were blocked in error, but perhaps you could have done those edits under your username if you chose to sign them with your username. By the way, we're getting many thousands of new users every day, far too many to send welcome messages to them all, and many of which never make any contributions at all... so I'm not sure if it serves much purpose to do large numbers of welcome messages to users registered minutes earlier who haven't made their first edit yet. -- Curps 06:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps, Curps, you could stop making irrational decisions. It never hurts to welcome people. It hurts the community a lot to punish people who are doing no wrong, then blame them for doing what they think is right to cover up your mistake. --24.221.8.253 06:51, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- The block was reasonable. There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Chooserr again, you can post your opinions there if you wish. -- Curps 07:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC)