You have been blocked from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content. (TW) |
Chernobog95 (talk | contribs) I am sick of double standards. |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistently adding [[Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1|unsourced or poorly sourced content]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Amortias|Amortias]] ([[User talk:Amortias|T]])([[Special:Contributions/Amortias|C]]) 21:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-ucblock --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistently adding [[Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1|unsourced or poorly sourced content]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Amortias|Amortias]] ([[User talk:Amortias|T]])([[Special:Contributions/Amortias|C]]) 21:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-ucblock --> |
||
: It is unfair that there is double standards about sources, the ones I used are from well respected and credible, often used as sources. Those individuals insist on 6700km figure by David Wright who later retracted his estimation due to not accounting for Earth's rotation into calculation of theoretical range while also denying 9700km estimate by John Schilling that is also theoretical. I am unfairly blocked due to false charges of poor/invalid sources to deny Hwasong-14 and other pages being updated with more relevant accurate information. John Schilling gave 8000km estimate and he is part of 38North and his newer estimate is 9700km. My last edit was a compromise to then and here I am blocked from editing due to narrative that is factually incorrect.{{unblock|reason= sources I used are valid and don't break rules [[User:Chernobog95|"path of prospero"]] ([[User talk:Chernobog95#top|talk]]) 22:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)}} [[User:Chernobog95|Chernobog95]] 00:38 July 12 2017 |
Revision as of 22:39, 11 July 2017
Lay off insulting other editors. I haven't re-written the engines part yet. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
Your addition to Hwasong-14 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please don't cut and paste material from websites (in this case, https://warontherocks.com/2017/07/north-koreas-icbm-a-new-missile-and-a-new-era/) - particularly when the website uses non-neutral terms when discussing the topic. BencherliteTalk 14:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Hwasong-14. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:42, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on North Korea and weapons of mass destruction. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Hornetzilla78 (talk) 14:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Also, how dare you insert that I "prefer outdated information" on your edit on the Hwasong-14, for your information, I do NOT "prefer outdated information". Hornetzilla78 (talk) 16:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Please stop vandalizing by reverting my edits as you misinform/mislead people by forcing information that is not up to date and has no relevance. Telling the truth to you is anyway personal attacks. Be offended at facts of your actions, how I dare point out your actions of using older information instead of newer more accurate ones. You are forcinf 6700km which is in accurate as David Wright admitted he didn't take into account earths rotation and Schilling revised his 8000km estimation to 9700km.Chernobog95 (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at North Korea and weapons of mass destruction. The source you added does not say that the missile has a range of 9,700 km, it says that it might one day get it, when fully developed... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 17:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Then by your standard none of sources involving theoretical range of North Korean missile is valid and so be it that estimation of 6700km for Hwasong-14 stays there despite individual who made that estimation has said it is invalid. Chernobog95 20:47 July 11 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Amortias (T)(C) 21:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)- It is unfair that there is double standards about sources, the ones I used are from well respected and credible, often used as sources. Those individuals insist on 6700km figure by David Wright who later retracted his estimation due to not accounting for Earth's rotation into calculation of theoretical range while also denying 9700km estimate by John Schilling that is also theoretical. I am unfairly blocked due to false charges of poor/invalid sources to deny Hwasong-14 and other pages being updated with more relevant accurate information. John Schilling gave 8000km estimate and he is part of 38North and his newer estimate is 9700km. My last edit was a compromise to then and here I am blocked from editing due to narrative that is factually incorrect.
Chernobog95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=sources I used are valid and don't break rules [[User:Chernobog95|"path of prospero"]] ([[User talk:Chernobog95#top|talk]]) 22:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=sources I used are valid and don't break rules [[User:Chernobog95|"path of prospero"]] ([[User talk:Chernobog95#top|talk]]) 22:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=sources I used are valid and don't break rules [[User:Chernobog95|"path of prospero"]] ([[User talk:Chernobog95#top|talk]]) 22:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Chernobog95 00:38 July 12 2017