Struthious Bandersnatch (talk | contribs) |
Guerillero (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
You are the subject of a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Chartreuse&Puce]]. You are welcome to participate in that discussion. --<span class="unicode" style="color:black;text-shadow:0.1em 0.1em 0.1em #777777">[[User:Struthious_Bandersnatch|▸₷<span style="font-variant:small-caps">truthious</span> Ⓑ<span style="font-variant:small-caps">andersnatch</span>◂]]</span> 22:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC) |
You are the subject of a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Chartreuse&Puce]]. You are welcome to participate in that discussion. --<span class="unicode" style="color:black;text-shadow:0.1em 0.1em 0.1em #777777">[[User:Struthious_Bandersnatch|▸₷<span style="font-variant:small-caps">truthious</span> Ⓑ<span style="font-variant:small-caps">andersnatch</span>◂]]</span> 22:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg |
|||
|imagesize=50px |
|||
|1=The following sanction now applies to you: |
|||
{{Talkquote|1=[[WP:TBAN|Topic ban]] from post-1932 American Politics}} |
|||
You have been sanctioned for [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] |
|||
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2020|log of sanctions]]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. |
|||
You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> [[User:Guerillero|<span style="color: #0b0080">Guerillero</span>]] | [[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]] 01:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
Revision as of 01:24, 18 August 2020
|
2017 UCF
Note, the article treatment is identical to other single-selector articles such as 2010 TCU Horned Frogs football team. Cheers, UW Dawgs (talk) 21:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 - MrX 🖋 19:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Talk:Kamala Harris. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Dear talk Fox News is a reliable source,and reported the affair. Willie Brown admitted to the affair. [1]
- It's not a mystery that she had an affair with Willie Brown. Putting in garbage like "she slept her way to the top" -- even on talk pages -- is an egregious violation of our WP:BLP policies, and should not be repeated. The article mentions they had a relationship, and that's all that can be said. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 20:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Exactly. The specific phrase you are using, "slept her way to the top", is the BLP violation I am referring to. They were in a relationship while he was already separated from his wife. She was qualified for the positions he appointed her to. Do not insinuate more than the sources say. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- OK, you did it again. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 20:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Exactly. The specific phrase you are using, "slept her way to the top", is the BLP violation I am referring to. They were in a relationship while he was already separated from his wife. She was qualified for the positions he appointed her to. Do not insinuate more than the sources say. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 20:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)- Dear --jpgordon and Muboshgu - I get that "slept her way to the top" should not be in the article. No kidding. But her affair with Willie Brown, who was mayor of San Francisco at the time, should be more prominently mentioned. Willie Brown admitted to the affair. He appointed Harris, who he was having sex with, to two high-paying commission posts, and jump-started her political career, while the two were having sex. It was reported by a Wikipedia reliable source. [2] These facts certainly merits mention. Otherwise, you are just stating that she had a relationship with Brown, but are leaving out the important details of how he started the political career of his lover. Chartreuse&Puce (talk) 20:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- And why a block? I kept getting error message after error message that my edit request was some sort of conflict, and to try again. Which I did. Repeatedly. Once I saw that the edit request had been responded to, I stopped. Chartreuse&Puce (talk) 20:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Dear --jpgordon and Muboshgu - I get that "slept her way to the top" should not be in the article. No kidding. But her affair with Willie Brown, who was mayor of San Francisco at the time, should be more prominently mentioned. Willie Brown admitted to the affair. He appointed Harris, who he was having sex with, to two high-paying commission posts, and jump-started her political career, while the two were having sex. It was reported by a Wikipedia reliable source. [2] These facts certainly merits mention. Otherwise, you are just stating that she had a relationship with Brown, but are leaving out the important details of how he started the political career of his lover. Chartreuse&Puce (talk) 20:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Arbitration request regarding Immigration policy of Donald Trump edits
You are the subject of a discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Chartreuse&Puce. You are welcome to participate in that discussion. --▸₷truthious Ⓑandersnatch◂ 22:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic ban from post-1932 American Politics
You have been sanctioned for disruptive editing
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 01:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)