CharlieJS13 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
warning |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
You had quite adequate warning that your behaviour was completely unacceptable, and the block should not have taken you by surprise. I hope that you will not repeat it now that you are back. For policy reasons, I cannot be the admin that would block you if you resume it, but the admin that blocked you the last time indicated that the next block would be permanent.—[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 17:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
You had quite adequate warning that your behaviour was completely unacceptable, and the block should not have taken you by surprise. I hope that you will not repeat it now that you are back. For policy reasons, I cannot be the admin that would block you if you resume it, but the admin that blocked you the last time indicated that the next block would be permanent.—[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 17:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
== AIV == |
|||
Please do not make disruptive requests at AIV. The three users you reported are ''clearly'' not engaging in vandalism; further reports of this nature will result in another block on this account. Thanks. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 17:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:26, 25 April 2010
Welcome!
Hello, CharlieJS13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Tommy (msg) 19:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
April 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Wear My Kiss. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Tbhotch, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TbhotchTalk C. 14:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Tbhotch. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. TbhotchTalk C. 15:05, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Telephone
I asked you once before earlier today to clarify why and what basis you think Lady Gaga should be credited by her stage name as a writer of the song? Where does it say on wikipedia policy or wikipedia rule pages that "the singer of the song who is the main songwriter, must be recognized by their stage name."? Previously you removed my comment. If you fail to respond (note that you have made several unjustified reverts) again i will have no choice but to take out a WP:ANI Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Am i taking it that your are refusing to respond? Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: Temporary block request
Last I was aware, calling a famous person by their real name was #1: Not a cause for blocking, #2: Meant to be done before listing a person's stage name according to WP:NAMES, a sub-article of WP:Manual of style. An example given in the article is: "Louis Bert Lindley Jr. (June 29, 1919 – December 8, 1983), better known by the stage name Slim Pickens..." - Vianello (Talk) 00:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Threaten
Please do not threaten me on the site. If you continue to do so, I will have to contact an administrator about you. CharlieJS13 (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Excuse me?, You *are* deleting *my* talkpage without my permission, thats vandalism. TbhotchTalk C. 15:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Main page or your home page?
If you're talking about a Wikipedia article, then it is not your talk page. Your talk page is on your home page. CharlieJS13 (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- .Here Template:Uw-delete1. TbhotchTalk C. 15:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Songwriting Credits
Songwriting credits should be given to the same people as credited on ASCAP or BMI. In the case of Lady Gaga, her songs are registered with BMI. BMI allows you to search for her both ways: compare
to
But, if you go look it up by song, the result is this, which indicates that the primary listing is under her real name, Stefani Germanotta.
When people write [[Lady Gaga|Stefani Germanotta]] or [[Stefani Germanotta]], that serves the purpose: it shows who the song is actually credited to, and, when clicked, takes you to an article about Lady Gaga.—Kww(talk) 15:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on LoveGame. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. —Kww(talk) 16:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
CharlieJS13, this is your final warning. Please stop edit warring on the Lady Gaga song articles and, instead, help reach a proper consensus by participating in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lady Gaga#Songwriter credit: Stage name vs. birth name. If you revert on any of these articles again, I will have no choice but to block your account from editing. Please be reasonable. — Satori Son 16:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for participating in that discussion. Remember, whatever the outcome, you must respect community consensus on the issue. Also, don't forget to sign your posts. — Satori Son 16:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- I have withdrawn the WP:AN3 report temporarily, as you have begun to communicate. Your statement that you "don't want an edit war" rings a little hollow: you've pursued an edit war against three editors for two days. If you didn't want to edit war, why did you keep doing it?—Kww(talk) 17:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- That doesn't make your behaviour acceptable. Even if you gain consensus for your point of view (unlikely, as Eric has chosen a guideline to quote that doesn't apply to this situation, and precedent is against you), the way you pursued it is wrong. After being reverted by two different editors, both of which have significantly more experience in editing music articles than you, you should have taken it to talk pages, and stopped reverting. Reverting without an edit summary, as you did here, is equivalent to calling the editor you are reverting a vandal, which is clearly not the case. Vandalising the user pages of editors that disagree with you is clearly unacceptable.—Kww(talk) 17:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 20:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC){{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 15:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Warnings
You had quite adequate warning that your behaviour was completely unacceptable, and the block should not have taken you by surprise. I hope that you will not repeat it now that you are back. For policy reasons, I cannot be the admin that would block you if you resume it, but the admin that blocked you the last time indicated that the next block would be permanent.—Kww(talk) 17:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
AIV
Please do not make disruptive requests at AIV. The three users you reported are clearly not engaging in vandalism; further reports of this nature will result in another block on this account. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 17:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)