Srich32977 (talk | contribs) →reverted BLP edits?: correction |
Carolmooredc (talk | contribs) →reverted BLP edits?: reminder not to post unofficial notices on my talk page |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
CORRECTION -- It looks like I misread your comment about BLP reverts. You were referring to Steele. In any event, such comments about Steele's editing history are off-topic. In this regard they are PA because they do not advance the discussion at hand. Please remove the entire post, including what you addressed to me. – [[User:Srich32977|S. Rich]] ([[User talk:Srich32977|talk]]) 17:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC) |
CORRECTION -- It looks like I misread your comment about BLP reverts. You were referring to Steele. In any event, such comments about Steele's editing history are off-topic. In this regard they are PA because they do not advance the discussion at hand. Please remove the entire post, including what you addressed to me. – [[User:Srich32977|S. Rich]] ([[User talk:Srich32977|talk]]) 17:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
:I guess I forgot to save this 1/2 hour ago, so I'll try again. Please do not post anything but official notices on my talk page. (And I assume they will not be frivolous ones.) I experience your constant chiding me to behave as you think I should as to be harassment, even if you are right 1/3 of the time. If you have a complaint or others do they can make official ones, or do it on the article talk page. Thank you. '''[[User:Carolmooredc]] ''' 18:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:42, 27 July 2013
Please post comments about the content of a specific article on the Talk Page of that Article if it is relevant to all editors.'
Gender bias task force
Hi Carol, something here you might be interested in. Best, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
SPECIFICO
Many thanks for the notice. After the multiple bogus edit war warnings and wikihounding, yeah, I am very interested. --Abel (talk) 14:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- Bad week to do an on SPECIFICO with people vacationing etc. and the issue being complicated. But already had one issue go stale, so thought I better do it anyway. Wikipedia doesn't seem to be able to deal with complicated issues any more and a lot of things that used to get responses don't. Editor drop off really taking its toll. Or maybe they all hate one faction of Austrian libertarian types :-( Among other theories. Frustrating. CarolMooreDC - talk to me🗽 15:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Given that trashing of BLPs is not a big issue anymore, I do believe that Wikipedia eventually could face a class action lawsuit charging Wikipedia Foundation malfeasance if some creepy-assed lawyers ever decided to put one together with 30 or 40 aggrieved subjects of bios. All they have to do is search throughout the BLP policy, BLPN and its header, ANI and other relevant pages and they could do a real big case based on copious written evidence.
- At least I've figured out what my favorite Wikimedia essay is. User:Carolmooredc 12:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Crystal Lake Recreation Area
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Crystal Lake Recreation Area. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Sequence is "Ready, Aim, Fire"
The guidance for WP:ANRFC says "Please ensure that your request here for a close is neutrally worded, and do not use this board to continue the discussion in question." I suggest you re-aim and then fire. (E.g., reword the request.) – S. Rich (talk) 16:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- I am asking in BLP issue where is best place to post. This is not a request for closure. I'll specify this. User:Carolmooredc 16:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- The notice board talk pages are best used for discussions about noticeboard procedures, improvements, wording, and the like. They are not "help pages" in which you ask for guidance. Your comments basically say "I'm not sure if I should post something on this notice board or if I should do so on that notice board." How about this -- you might post {{help}} on this page. As I understand it, lots of experienced editors patrol the help index and respond. (I offer this as a sincere suggestion.) Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 17:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I read such policy talk pages were for guidance as well, which often helps show what needs to be added to a policy page, and thus posted there. I won't bother to find the exact reference to that somewhere on some "policy talk pages" page. User:Carolmooredc 17:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- The notice board talk pages are best used for discussions about noticeboard procedures, improvements, wording, and the like. They are not "help pages" in which you ask for guidance. Your comments basically say "I'm not sure if I should post something on this notice board or if I should do so on that notice board." How about this -- you might post {{help}} on this page. As I understand it, lots of experienced editors patrol the help index and respond. (I offer this as a sincere suggestion.) Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 17:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
reverted BLP edits?
If you can't remember what edits have been reverted, go to my edit history and figure it out. (In other words, don't make vague, unsubstantiated accusations!) Besides being off-topic as to the RfC issue, your comment insinuates that I don't know what is proper procedure or policy. That is hardly the case. In fact, in this particular RfC, I am trying to resolve the BLP problems in the North article. Read the discussion above and you will see that I am trying to get rid of the OR posted by editors who have an axe to grind. Please remove your post on the RfC threaded discussion. – S. Rich (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
CORRECTION -- It looks like I misread your comment about BLP reverts. You were referring to Steele. In any event, such comments about Steele's editing history are off-topic. In this regard they are PA because they do not advance the discussion at hand. Please remove the entire post, including what you addressed to me. – S. Rich (talk) 17:25, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
- I guess I forgot to save this 1/2 hour ago, so I'll try again. Please do not post anything but official notices on my talk page. (And I assume they will not be frivolous ones.) I experience your constant chiding me to behave as you think I should as to be harassment, even if you are right 1/3 of the time. If you have a complaint or others do they can make official ones, or do it on the article talk page. Thank you. User:Carolmooredc 18:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)