Ncmvocalist (talk | contribs) →Note: i'm not going to feed trolling. bye. |
→Note: add |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 325: | Line 325: | ||
::::Oh I have no doubt you wouldn't care about drama - that much is clear from your poor handling of this entire matter, and your mindbogglingly bad faith assumption about lame excuses that seems to be begging for an uncivil response. You're still not getting it, and I hope it's merely because I didn't give you enough time to let it sink in - if not, and, you're still going to be hell bent on learning it the hard way one day, then I bid you good luck! Bye, [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 15:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC) |
::::Oh I have no doubt you wouldn't care about drama - that much is clear from your poor handling of this entire matter, and your mindbogglingly bad faith assumption about lame excuses that seems to be begging for an uncivil response. You're still not getting it, and I hope it's merely because I didn't give you enough time to let it sink in - if not, and, you're still going to be hell bent on learning it the hard way one day, then I bid you good luck! Bye, [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 15:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::::trolling? thought i have been responding to ... in my own page. poor handling? unilaterally closing a discussion and supremely "judgemental" collapsing? --<b><FONT FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" Color="##003399">[[User:CarTick|Car]]</FONT><FONT FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" Color=" #254117">[[User talk:CarTick|Tick]]</FONT></b> 16:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:34, 12 April 2010
Please make sure, you watchlist this page. I will reply here to keep the conversation coherent, unless I believe you are unlikely to check back.
TN assembly
Ya if that's easier. But just make sure that it reflects the current MLAs for each constituencies, since it has changed a lot since 2006.Nader85021 (talk) 04:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
newly delimited constituencies
I see your point. The only problem is its hard to see which ones are new constituents which ones are old. I am thinking about going through all the defunct constituency and indicate for each of the state assembly constituents, what lok sabha constituent it was merged with.--Harish89 (talk) 16:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
duplicate articles
Yes, those are duplicate articles, and they should be deleted.--Harish89 (talk) 04:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Can you help find a public domain/licensed as free to use image of her? Looks like the one image that's available right now is on the deletion path. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 18:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- That is not going to be easy. hope someone who has her picture will volunteer to upload it. will see. --CarTick 00:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- I tried searching, but couldn't find much in terms of photos on flickr or picassa. Haven't been able to find some other of her early concert pics that ought to be in public domain either. Hoping to take this to GA soon, after actually writing something in the article, so a couple of photos would definitely help. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 03:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Did I forget to thank you? ..
good luck. --CarTick 13:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Category question
Since you're the politics cats guy, is there any reason to have this newly created Category:Former Nominated Rajya Sabha members? It was split off from the main one last week. It doesn't read well IMO, but I'm also wondering on the need for it. At any time there's no more than six current members, so why have only the current ones on the main and the former on the sub-cat, if at all, shouldn't it be the other way round? cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 04:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- the number of articles in both categories being very few, i understand ur concern. Nevertheless, i have to admit that it adds a level of clarity. --CarTick 04:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- What about a rename? Does it read correctly to you? I'm finding the Former + nominated qualification at the start a bit difficult, but maybe it's just me. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 04:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Disputed article name at Sivakasi riots of 1899
Hello CarTick. Please participate at Talk:Sivakasi riots of 1899 to explain why you think this is the best name. The article has been moved twice in quick succession with no apparent discussion. This may appear to some people as move-warring. EdJohnston (talk) 05:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Please check out Talk:Sivakasi riots of 1899#Naming issues. Thanks.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 06:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-SpacemanSpiff 19:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Check this?
Translation request. Don't know if it's the same person I mentioned. -SpacemanSpiff 21:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 11:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Doctor muthu's muthu wanna talk ? 11:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-SpacemanSpiff 01:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Re:Elections
Right now, I am occupied with getting V. S. Srinivasa Sastri to GA.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 12:43, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
TN politicos
New stub types for creation -- discussion here. -SpacemanSpiff 06:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
uniformity in election colors
Sure we could do that. How do you think we should do the coloring?--Harish89 (talk) 18:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- we dont need to use different colours for different parties and rather use a single light colour over all or no colour at all. it just looks too gaudy otherwise. --CarTick 18:14, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Is up for delisting from FA. I'm trying to make sense of the article right now, too much junk has crept in when no one looked. Want to take a stab on the talk page? Sodabottle? -SpacemanSpiff 23:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- having a narrow scope, I am surprised it was nominated a FA in the first place. --CarTick 04:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Was Nichalp's FA, and I haven't seen him around since I started editing. I've left a few points on the article talk page. It can actually be kept as an FA, but it needs to be trimmed down first. BTW, using AWB, it should be easy to create the politician stubs without difficulty, read through the link Ganesh provided and it seems quite simple.-SpacemanSpiff 04:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Some suggestions awaithing you on the talk as requested India noticeboard. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- thank you so much. appreciate it. will look into it later today. --CarTick 16:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Pictures in 1967 state assembly election
Aren't the pictures for the leaders under public domain, since its been more than 60 years since the image was taken? --Harish89 (talk) 05:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- yes, If we can prove it was taken 60 years before. so far, I havent seen anything. --CarTick 12:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
AWB
Looks like you're going full on with AWB. Have you tried creating pages yet? When you do, let me know and give me an AWB for dummies version :) I've got a bunch of first-class cricketers I need to create. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 21:21, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
- i love the tool. too bad i realised its usefulness very late almost when I was done with my current project. let us see what will come next. I still have to try how to use it for new pages creation. will let you know. thanks. --CarTick 23:29, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
re dyk hook for Sathyavani Muthu
At dyk hook for Sathyavani Muthu, I could not find the hook information in the source given. Could you point it out? Thanks! —mattisse (Talk) 18:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- I have added this clarification in the hook - The citation says "It (admk) was the first Dravidian party to join power actively when its representatives Satyavani Muthu and Bala Pazhanoor were inducted into the Charan Singh ministry three decades ago in 1979." In Tamil Nadu politics, non-congress parties are all Dravidian parties and in 1979, ADMK became the first non congress Tamil Nadu party to join the Union Government. ergo. Satyavani Muthu and Bala Pazhanoor are the first two non INC members from TN to serve as an Union Ministers in India--Sodabottle (talk) 18:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Sathyavani Muthu
Materialscientist (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
karuna old
It was just a cropped image of File:AnnaMKMGR.jpg. They have info of it on that file.--Harish89 (talk) 03:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
CR formula
Your comments and suggestions are welcome on this article. Thanks Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 09:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks mate :) Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 14:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Help with cats
Can you help me with adding cats for C. R. formula. You are pretty good with cats (I obviously don't mean the cats that meow!)as far as I can see. Thanks Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 07:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- what about Category:Partition of India? --CarTick 12:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Anymore you can think of? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 13:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for K. A. Mathiazhagan
Materialscientist (talk) 11:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
satyamurthi
we have two articles for satyamurthi - Sathyamurthy and S. Satyamurti. which one should go?--Sodabottle (talk) 08:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sathyamurthy should stay as it appears to have more referenced info. The article can be moved to S. Sathyamurthy later. --CarTick 13:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
Greetings of the Season | ||
A merry good morning I wish you, My friends both great and small. When the world, for his fare, shall press you, may you n'er go to the wall. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:31, 25 December 2009 (UTC) |
Tamil Nadu politician stubs
have been created. I've added the first one to some articles based on categories, can you and Sodabottle take a look and add the other two, as well as the first one? I'm not sure what all lists you have, but if you do, then it's an AWB task. Merry Christmas. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 16:31, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- thanks for letting me know. just Category:Tamil Nadu politicians and all sub categories, specifically : . Wish you a Merry Christmas. --CarTick 17:18, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
tn template
shall we add a politics sub division to the state of tamil nadu template? and add it to all election related articles? [1]
DYK for Madras Presidency legislative council election, 1920
≈ Chamal talk ¤ 03:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Madras Presidency legislative council election, 1923
Wikiproject: Did you know? 11:42, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Madras Presidency legislative council election, 1926
The Did you know? project 00:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Madras Presidency legislative council election, 1930
Wizardman Operation Big Bear 06:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
how many articles in your opinion an article has to be linked from in order not to be an orphan. --CarTick 02:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that the article is an orphan is not based on my opinion, but on official Wikipedia policy. Fewer than three non-redirect, article incoming links. While the two incoming links are most likely sufficient, at least one more would be useful. Then the {{orphan}} tag can be removed. Feel free to contact me again if you have any more questions. You might also try WP:ORPHAN. -Ryan (My Page) (Talk) 02:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
it is linked to Tamil Nadu legislative assembly election, 2001, Tiruvarur (State Assembly Constituency) and Tamil Nadu legislative assembly election, 1996. --CarTick 03:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- My apologies, I see. The tag has been removed. Ryan ([[User Talk:Ryan|Talk) 03:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Service awards proposal
I don't know but it looked to me as a vandalism form a shared IP--Bigsuperindia (talk) 01:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- a discussion on the fate of this article is ongoing. Comments welcome! --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 17:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi
Check out my reply here. Cheers.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 06:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Dravidian parties
Can you comment on this please? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 11:49, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Government=Country?
Hi CarTick. Just a quick question. I bumped into this which said India had initially, under Indira Gandhi[4][5]and later under Rajiv Gandhi, began to sympathize …. Here I reckon we have to read this as Indian union government had initially, under Indira Gandhi[4][5]and later under Rajiv Gandhi, began to sympathize… rather than Indian people had initially, under Indira Gandhi[4][5]and later under Rajiv Gandhi, began to sympathize …. Is there any norm that equates the ruling government to the country itself? I'm not trying to be fussy, but just plain curious. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 08:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- BTW why
isdoes your user space say that you are an MLA? Are you? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 12:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)- well, it clearly can mean both. you can change it to Indian Government since we dont know if Indian people sympathised really. By the way, MLA? where did you see that??? --CarTick 13:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- In the bottom of your page (and also listed in Category:Tamil Nadu MLAs). I reckon it should have been added by accident. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 14:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- that is unbelieveable. funny.. found it, it is this message. --CarTick 14:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Take home lesson: You will have to displace at least one colon (pun intended) to be an MLA in TN. ;) Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 15:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- that is unbelieveable. funny.. found it, it is this message. --CarTick 14:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- In the bottom of your page (and also listed in Category:Tamil Nadu MLAs). I reckon it should have been added by accident. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 14:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- well, it clearly can mean both. you can change it to Indian Government since we dont know if Indian people sympathised really. By the way, MLA? where did you see that??? --CarTick 13:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
--CarTick 15:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added SBC-YPR (talk) 14:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
This article has been reviewed at WP:GAN and is on hold pending revisions. See the review here. WTF? (talk) 04:35, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank u very much. I am very busy the next couple of days. i will work on ur suggestions afterwards. --CarTick 04:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- I will look into it cartick--Sodabottle (talk) 04:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Would a genealogy tree ...
.. something like this be of any use? Or is it an overkill? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 11:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- what a great idea. please go for it. we could add it in all related parties articles. --CarTick 11:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Second that. That is the best idea i have heard about in months :-)--Sodabottle (talk) 13:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- please remember to include Self-respect movement as well. --CarTick 13:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks guys. I will work on that soon. May be parties and movements can have different colours. I will have to revisit the dates and events. It might be a bit confusing on what parties actually could be included in the chart. We will learn as we progress. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 15:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- please remember to include Self-respect movement as well. --CarTick 13:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- we will discuss that. --CarTick 16:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Officially stuck! Not sure if have to have all parties listed in the template. TR's hop-in and hop-out stuff would complicate it a lot. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 18:49, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- we will discuss that. --CarTick 16:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- next can be 1996 ADMK split and birth of MGR ADMK, later merger with BJP.--Sodabottle (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Does this look alright? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 22:59, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- I was just looking at it. looks great. Did you use information from wikipedia? the details may need to be double checked, i am not saying there are necessarily any mistakes. --CarTick 23:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, most information are made consistent with Wikipedia entries. It might be wrong in some cases, but its not a deal to sort that out as and when we get the info. BTW, the entire tree looks too long and may not fit into any article when we think about it. A picture like File:St_Thomas_Christians_divisions.png might be a better idea, although it can't be have links to specific entries. Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 14:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- you are right. it can become a stand alone article or fit into Dravidian parties at the least. on the other hand, if we can convert it into an image file, we could add it everywhere we want. christian divisions file looks like a good model. but will take some of your time. --CarTick 15:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Just check out this article. I can't even make what it is about. Is it about Kongu Nadu or the Kongu Vellala Gounder community? I understand that someone is upto vigorous casteist propaganda. And there are no published, credible references.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 16:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- you are right. the whole thing is unreferenced crap. but the article itself can stay and hopefully somebody will take care of it. by the way, glad to see you around. --CarTick 18:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- No, I am not calling for it's deletion. I think you have mistaken me here. Someone has been injecting propaganda about a particular community in an article which concerns a region. Now, the stuff present in the article is unrelated to the title of the article.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 01:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Reliable source???
Hi! I just came across this edit of yours. Please check the source. The book you provided as source uses content taken from an earlier version of this very Wikipedia article. See [2]-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 04:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I hope you notice the "[WP]" at the end.-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 04:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
AWB help
Hi, SpacemanSpiff suggested I ask you, since you can run AWB: when/if you have some time, could you take all the articles in Category:Carnatic Ragas and remove Category:Carnatic music and Category:Ragas from them? Not very important, and I'll probably get to it myself eventually, but it would help. :-) Regards, Shreevatsa (talk) 22:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- little confused. dont wanna be making mistake. i removed Category:Carnatic music from two articles already. I will go ahead remove from Category:Ragas as well. but pls confirm with me this is what you wanted. --CarTick 00:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yup, that's correct. Category:Carnatic Ragas is part of Category:Carnatic music and Category:Ragas, so the articles should only belong to the Carnatic ragas category. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 00:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Shreevatsa, Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser is pretty easy to install and operate. i will be happy to help you with ur questions. --CarTick 00:48, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help! What you did was exactly what was needed. I'm not on Windows, so to run AWB I need(ed) to start VMWare which tends to run slowly these days, so I was hesitant to do it... but I've got it running now, thanks for the suggestion. :-) Shreevatsa (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Note
[3] Ncmvocalist (talk) 05:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- if u read the post carefully, you would have noticed that I have given up on my attempt. Besides, I disagree with you that we need the consent of the wider wikipedia community. As far as i can tell, he is not under any ban or block. --CarTick 17:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- You don't seem to be getting it. If you considered I did read it carefully, you'd realise I'd paid most particular attention to where you said "unless i get more positive responses." [emphasis added] We haven't often set up an initiative to welcome back other (often more) prolific contributors who retired from the project, if ever - if we did, there might not have been an issue here. But it doesn't seem likely, given the wider community's extremely dim view on this issue, and you did not disclose such material facts, despite being aware of them. Also, the wider community has not ever blocked or banned an account who is so inactive as far as I'm aware - the community's refusal to take moot actions does not mean that there are no issues with an editor returning. I have no view on your proposal with respect to Nichalp, but it's not so much a consent issue, as it is avoiding needless controversial drama for the WikiProject (noticeboard). I have no idea why you didn't/don't feel ready to approach the wider community, but I do hope you'll put some more thought into your future comments. In any case, given that you seem to have clarified that you have given up on your attempt altogether, and the "unless" clause appears to be poorly chosen, I'll collapse my criticism also. Ncmvocalist (talk) 11:26, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Remember he was never blocked. It was only his sock who was blocked. personally, i dont care if Nichalp gets back or not. I dont think u read my post properly, as far as i can tell, u just read it now and are trying to defend yourself with some lame excuse. why should "unless" bother you much, will you have been concerned if more people responded positively? since he is not banned, i dont think a wider community discussion is necessary. I wouldnt be worried about drama as every such issue in wikipedia has always attracted more or less drama. it is a bad idea you closed the discussion before allowing others to participate or let the discussion become stale. --CarTick 12:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh I have no doubt you wouldn't care about drama - that much is clear from your poor handling of this entire matter, and your mindbogglingly bad faith assumption about lame excuses that seems to be begging for an uncivil response. You're still not getting it, and I hope it's merely because I didn't give you enough time to let it sink in - if not, and, you're still going to be hell bent on learning it the hard way one day, then I bid you good luck! Bye, Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)