Warning: Vandalism on Total DramaRama. Tags: Twinkle Reverted |
Renamed user 3429187546 (talk | contribs) Was just a single edit, jeez... Tags: Undo Reverted |
||
Line 319: | Line 319: | ||
:Clearly You are Edit Warring, Edit Warring is not allowed on wikipedia [[User:Chip3004|Chip3004]] ([[User talk:Chip3004|talk]]) 20:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC) |
:Clearly You are Edit Warring, Edit Warring is not allowed on wikipedia [[User:Chip3004|Chip3004]] ([[User talk:Chip3004|talk]]) 20:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Total DramaRama]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. ''Unexplained reverts are disruptive.''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 00:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Inclusion of Disney+ originals in Disney Channel == |
== Inclusion of Disney+ originals in Disney Channel == |
Revision as of 00:10, 15 August 2022
Welcome!
Hello, BrickMaster02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:American Idol Live 2015.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:American Idol Live 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
March 2020
Hello, I'm AldezD. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced information or change content based upon your own WP:OR as you did in this edit. AldezD (talk) 17:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Orphaned non-free image File:TheSubstituteLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:TheSubstituteLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Deer Squad
What makes you say the number I gave for the 6th episode isn't the actual rating? Wubzy (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
The ratings you provided were for the Nick Jr. airing at 8 PM, while I provided the ratings for the original 9 AM airing on Nickelodeon. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2019 in American television, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 13:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:NickUnfilteredLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:NickUnfilteredLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TheAstronautsLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:TheAstronautsLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
American Idol Season 19 Finale Date
Why did you get rid of the source of the American Idol Season 19 Finale date? Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 04:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
I removed it because who knows if it could get moved back. Personally, I'd rather wait until the finale actually airs instead of jumping ahead. BrickMaster02 (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Ratings Data for 101 Dalmatian Street
Since the series has aired on Disney XD USA, I was wondering if you could add the data of the ratings for each when they first premiered in the US. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 04:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Please, More Data....
I want you to insert the ratings dats for the Amphibia episode "True Colors", the 101 Dalmatian Street episode "Fetch"/"Don't Push Your Luck", the The Chicken Squad episodes that have aired so far and the HouseBroken episode "Who Did This?".
That is absolutely impossible. The only site to cover those ratings, Showbuzz Daily, shut down and no one knows what they were. Sorry, but you're gonna have to deal with that. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
Hello, I'm Bcschneider53. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Common Knowledge (game show) that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from edit summaries such as this one and settle disagreements with civility on the talk page. No need for public personal attacks on anonymous IPs (or anyone else) like that. Thank you. Bcschneider53 (talk) 02:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't blame you. I didn't feel alright after posting that. I'm willing to accept my consequences. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. I do get it, I really do, and indeed I have seen that IP vandalizing and have tried to help with that myself. But, honestly, the simple fact is that if you react with incivility you put yourself in the wrong with them! I know it is annoying but the rules here are designed to try to stop things escalating. (And no, they don't always work!) So I will just say good luck, count to 10, and Happy Editing! Cheers DBaK (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Johnny Test (2005)
Please clean-up the episode list to the series, as it tends to go by production order rather than US broadcast order. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'm good. Thanks for the request, though. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Stop it!!!
Why do you revert my edits on List of programs broadcast by TeenNick?, I only removed some fake and unsourced information, and updated according to the current status, and I think is very irrelevant to list every movie that has aired on every network, we don't wanna list every film that has aired on TeenNick, that list is unverificable, and olny list the movies thas have aired on the NickRewind block, please, do not undo my edits again!!!--SCD0392 (talk) 00:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hey...please stop it. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
GhostForce
I currently have a sandbox for the show. It doesn't have an actual article yet and there is currently only two episodes on the episode list. Can you please help me construct it? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- I do my own articles, thank you very much. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Viewership counts for episodes 30-35 of 101DS
Find any viewership data on ShowBuzz Daily? If so, I'm happy. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Can you please, for the love of God, stop going to my talk page and requesting things that I'm never going to do? The ratings are not on Showbuzz and are only on SpoilerTV. Good day. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Orphaned non-free image File:FamJamLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:FamJamLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Your user page history
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Severestorm28 04:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Adventures of Paddington (2019 TV series) into Draft:List of The Adventures of Paddington episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- It's just a draft, and a lot of the episode lists I've seen for TV shows copy the first part of the original page. Why am I always attacked on this website? BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- It wasn't intended as an attack. I'm just letting you know that attribution is always required whenever you copy text from another article that you didn't originally write yourself, which is what happened in this case. That requirement is also true for any episode list that copies from the parent article. DanCherek (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of The Adventures of Paddington episodes has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 23:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)February 2022
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Renamed user 3429187546 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel really bad about what I did, and I have learned my lesson. Even though I "tried" to clean up, it didn't work and I don't care anymore. I really want to make a change and not argue with people on this site, and I can't do that if I'm blocked. Please unblock me, and I swear I will never do anything like this ever again. And if I do, you have the right to permanently ban me from this site.
Decline reason:
This does not address your edit warring and your refusal to collaborate. What would you do differently if unblocked? How would you resolve this problem, if it happens again? Yamla (talk) 09:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|reason=On Promised Land (2022 TV series), I was trying to clean up the episode table, have each label (Director, Writer, Original air date) layered. I just thought YoungForever was undoing my changes out of spite. Turns out I was the one who undid her changes out of spite. If I was unblocked and resolved this problem, I would actually give an explanation in the edit summary or go on the talk page in advance and discuss more in-depth. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)}
- Two things. One, have you read WP:NPA? Two, users are rarely ever permanently banned, even in severe cases like this. They're almost always just indefinitely blocked, which means the block can still be appealed. Also, if things start getting heated between you and another editor, you should stop, and step away. I understand that may be hard to do sometimes (heck, even sometimes I have a hard time staying cool in certain situations) but you should always make an effort to de-escalate the situation. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- So, I’m not getting unblocked? BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know. That's for an admin to decide, not me. IF you aren't unblocked it'd be best for you to wait a bit before appealing your block again and take that time to read through some of the relevant policies. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:47, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- The last admin that saw my appeal said "you need to take more than a week away from Wikipedia". Some admin, amirite? BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, given what happened, that would probably be in your best interest. Getting blocked and then appealing it only a few hours doesn't really show that you've learned much (if anything). I'm not accusing you of being stupid though, that's just usually what happens. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- You know what? That’s not really helping. I just want to be unblocked, and not want this community to hate me. BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm trying to help you out here. I see you're already starting to get agitated again. Please, calm down and just take a moment to review the policies that are relevant to your block. If I hated you I wouldn't be trying to help you out. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- I mean, you kinda aren’t. I don’t have a resolution to have my appeal approved. BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:59, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'm trying to help you out here. I see you're already starting to get agitated again. Please, calm down and just take a moment to review the policies that are relevant to your block. If I hated you I wouldn't be trying to help you out. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- You know what? That’s not really helping. I just want to be unblocked, and not want this community to hate me. BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, given what happened, that would probably be in your best interest. Getting blocked and then appealing it only a few hours doesn't really show that you've learned much (if anything). I'm not accusing you of being stupid though, that's just usually what happens. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- The last admin that saw my appeal said "you need to take more than a week away from Wikipedia". Some admin, amirite? BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know. That's for an admin to decide, not me. IF you aren't unblocked it'd be best for you to wait a bit before appealing your block again and take that time to read through some of the relevant policies. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:47, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- So, I’m not getting unblocked? BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
is closed. Thanks @Blaze Wolf: for trying to help. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. I saw the user's unblock request as sincere but not quite enough for them to be unblocked so I attempted to help them by telling them some things they need to address. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- So much for helping me. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Well you pretty much told me that you didn't want my help so I stopped attempting to help. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Well now, I need your help. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Alright. Unfortunately I can't see the reason for decline in your UTRS appeal since that's limited to only admins (and I'm not one, despite what some people think), so that makes it a bit harder since I don't know why it was declined and can't help you address the concerns in it. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I checked. He said this:
- Alright. Unfortunately I can't see the reason for decline in your UTRS appeal since that's limited to only admins (and I'm not one, despite what some people think), so that makes it a bit harder since I don't know why it was declined and can't help you address the concerns in it. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Well now, I need your help. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Well you pretty much told me that you didn't want my help so I stopped attempting to help. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- So much for helping me. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block. PLEASE see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Points to PONDER: EDIT WARRING is wrong even if one is right. ANY ARGUMENTS in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal. CALLING ATTENTION to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior. To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what this all means.
- I'm currently writing another block appeal request. ::::::I'm currently writing another block appeal request. Update: This is the message I got after trying to send my new appeal:
It has been detected that you or someone else is trying to spam our system with appeals. Please wait until your previous appeal is closed, or if it's already closed, please try again later.
BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Well I think first you should read the relevant policies, such as WP:EW and WP:BRD (which is not a policy but a supplement to other policies). When I'm editing, if I make an edit that I think is right and I Get reverted, and I don't think the other editor is right, instead of immediately reverting, I start a discussion on the talk page, asking them why they think their edit is right so we can reach an understanding. Now, that doesn't necessarily work if the editor simply ignores your talk page message and continues doing their edit (which you can see that situation happening at Ong Seong-wu). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, I totally get that. I just want to get unblocked without waiting a week. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know what the "spam appeals" thing is about (or how to fix it since I haven't been blocked before). Also, you may just have to wait a week to be unblocked. Remember, there is no deadline.― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, I totally get that. I just want to get unblocked without waiting a week. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Well I think first you should read the relevant policies, such as WP:EW and WP:BRD (which is not a policy but a supplement to other policies). When I'm editing, if I make an edit that I think is right and I Get reverted, and I don't think the other editor is right, instead of immediately reverting, I start a discussion on the talk page, asking them why they think their edit is right so we can reach an understanding. Now, that doesn't necessarily work if the editor simply ignores your talk page message and continues doing their edit (which you can see that situation happening at Ong Seong-wu). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Renamed user 3429187546 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "BrickMaster02". The reason given for BrickMaster02's block is: "Edit warring; personal attacks (filed a report against the other editor at WP:AIV; refusal to collaborate (reverted the other editor's attempt to discuss the dispute on the article Talk page)".
March 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Paramount+. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex_21 TALK 23:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- I've just seen the above; you're already edit-warring a week after coming out of a week-long block for the exact same reason? Navigation boxes are for navigation, not linkless text. -- Alex_21 TALK 00:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:YoungForever. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 21:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Says the person that told me to "Go away", but I've decided not to speak up and instead stay quiet, so I'm done. BrickMaster02 (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- "Go away" is not a personal attack. Calling someone "arrogant" is personal attack. Please learn the differences. — YoungForever(talk) 21:58, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
List of programs broadcast by Disney XD
Only one other Disney XD list-of article for the United Kingdom exists among all the DXD networks, many of which are now defunct or about to be; I just removed the Latin American version which had ONE source and was duplicative of this list, along with Jetix and Fox Kids, and every other list among these defunct networks has a blazing 'unsourced' tag on the top. There's no point to maintain these lists when one united list-of article can cover it all, thus my reason for reverting the 'U.S.' part (and it doesn't have anything saying 'just American' in the title). Nate • (chatter) 01:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Please respond to the concern above; the point of talk pages is to discuss issues, and I feel I do have a valid reason for changing the above page. Nate • (chatter) 03:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't care about this anymore. Go ahead if you want, I'm not in charge of the page. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Then why did you argue about the addition so vehemently? You need to learn how to work out conflicts much better than 'whatever, do what you want' when you get exhausted with something like others have tried before above. I was willing to work with you on this issue, but obviously you see edit priorities much differently than most. Nate • (chatter) 00:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Because the program lists for Nicktoons and Disney Junior have the same thing. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Then why did you argue about the addition so vehemently? You need to learn how to work out conflicts much better than 'whatever, do what you want' when you get exhausted with something like others have tried before above. I was willing to work with you on this issue, but obviously you see edit priorities much differently than most. Nate • (chatter) 00:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't care about this anymore. Go ahead if you want, I'm not in charge of the page. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
This personal attack is uncalled for. Please be kind to other editors, even if you disagree with them or they're vandalizing. Nate • (chatter) 03:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
No clue if I did this right... How did you get this image to be a fully transparent background? (for reference, the logo is available on the Nickelodeon website.) Magitroopa (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know why you're asking me out of everyone else, but I just found it on the Nick website and cropped out the excess empty space. BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Steve Burns vandal
If the editor most recently on Special:Contributions/2603:300A:F00:3000:0:0:0:0/64 reappears with Steve Burns vandalism, let me know. We might need to get an edit filter created to stop this user. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Sunmist (talk) 03:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Please just cut out all of the profanities and telling people to "go away" in edit summaries. In fact, do not attempt to talk to people in edit summaries at all. Use them for the purpose that's there in their very name: to summarize an edit. They're there for the benefits of other people to scan through an edit history to locate who did what and when, not to be used as a chat tool. "go away" doesn't tell us what happened to the article or why.
Look at my edit summary of Special:Diff/1081883901, for example. I said why I did what I did in the edit, and that is it. Special:Diff/1081941063 is an edit summary from someone else, likewise just summarizing the edit. I'm also talking with the writer of the article, but using a talk page for that, not edit summaries. And we're getting along well.
You're clearly finding it difficult to control your feelings in edit summaries, so the best thing to do is just impose a blanket rule on yourself never to use edit summaries to do anything other than summarize an edit. When you find yourself tempted to do so, pause. Try to aim for the plain unadorned descriptivity of Special:Diff/1081682285, everywhere.
Uncle G (talk) 07:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Steve Burns/Donovan Patton vandalism
Came upon this IP range (that is now blocked) earlier tonight with the same Steve Burns/Donovan Patton vandalism I'd previously seen on other articles (ex: [1] [2] [3] [4]). I definitely remember seeing this same sort of vandalism on a previous article(s?), but can't remember when/where at all. Would you possibly have any clue?... Magitroopa (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Is it in the same range as the informal TUFF Puppy reunion adder on pages like the Mario movie? Kinda curious--CreecregofLife (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know why you guys are coming to me, a guy who was blocked twice, to answer this. I don't focus on that stuff usually, I just report and move on. I would not be surprised if it is the same person, though. BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Holey Moley Season 4 Episode one progress table
Hey BrickMaster02, I thought you were gonna add the progress table for the Season 4 premiere episode. But I don't see it. Do you think you can add it soon?74.96.187.96 (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't do that stuff. Sorry. BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Then who does add the tables and when do you think they'll be uploaded? 74.96.187.96 (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- How would I know? I just add the viewers. BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Then who does add the tables and when do you think they'll be uploaded? 74.96.187.96 (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Amphibia episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Again, the press site is broken with the 307 code being repeated. Haven't you checked? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Amphibia
Why are you ignoring the note?--CreecregofLife (talk) 00:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Because we don't go by what the production codes were for that episode. Sure it's both for a double-length episode, but it's still Episode 17. If you want to be 18, why not change the 17 on the episode list to 17 and 18? BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Because it’s not about being a double length episode. Did you read the note? The one right next to what you were reverting? It’s not about how many episodes in the season have aired, it’s the amount of episodes in the season overall CreecregofLife (talk) 00:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, but the overview says 18. So why not go ahead and change it if you have a problem with my edits? BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Because it’s not about being a double length episode. Did you read the note? The one right next to what you were reverting? It’s not about how many episodes in the season have aired, it’s the amount of episodes in the season overall CreecregofLife (talk) 00:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:38, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Please reply.Lurking shadow (talk) 12:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit without reasons ? Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- We don't count airdates outside of Korea and the U.S. BrickMaster02 (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, Thanks. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 22:07, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Chapa's last name
They revealed Chapa's last name in Unmasked earlier tonight. Did I spell it wrong? Connor Marini (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- It was already revealed back in one of the final Henry Danger episodes, so I don't think it's worthy to add that in the article. Then again, I don't have cable anymore, so what do I care? BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
A highly committed sock.
Hi. I noticed you have sent a warning to user True to the Music. I have started many SPIs on this user but I can't be bothered to do so again. It's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fourlaxers/Archive NEDOCHAN (talk) 15:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Children's TV, especially Thomas & Friends and Power Rangers, are their area. Enjoy and sorry.NEDOCHAN (talk) 20:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Transformers: Earthspark shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
Can you please stop undoing everything on List of Paramount Global television programs please? If you do so you won't do that again. 82.37.139.114 (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Clearly You are Edit Warring, Edit Warring is not allowed on wikipedia Chip3004 (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Inclusion of Disney+ originals in Disney Channel
Please include the Disney+ originals show within Disney Channel programming. Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon have included shows from HBO Max & Paramount+, respectively. It's usually the shows produced by their studios (eg. Nick Animation Studio, CN Studios, WB Animation). MegaSmike46 (talk) 15:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. Those shows for Nick and CN are regularly airing, while the ones from Disney+ were to promote those shows. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- So I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens. However, until further notice, let's agree to keep Disney+ separate. MegaSmike46 (talk) 00:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
America Says win rate
Hi BrickMaster02, you seen to be well-versed in America Says, adding the new episodes to Wikipedia as they air. Do you happen to know the win rate across all the games or know where i might be able to find that info? I can't find it anywhere after some extensive googling! Thanks 2600:1007:B11E:884C:5889:186B:6C9:DD8C (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- I do not. I only update the page when new episodes air, because no one else does it. Sorry. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the information and thanks for keeping us up to date on the America Says game facts! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1007:B11E:884C:5889:186B:6C9:DD8C (talk) 15:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Undoing my edits
Why did you undo my edits on Are You Afraid of the Dark? page then re add it make it look like it was your idea to add the producers? All you had to do was add what you added without UNDOING my edits first. It makes what I did look like I did something wrong!! ACase0000 (talk) 23:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- It was not my intention. I just re-added them and put the years they served as EP. Don't assume what I'm doing is wrong. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Reverting
You keep reverting edits that other users have made and it is very frustrating. In America Says I edited the episode numbers and you reverted my edit and edited exactly what I did. Today in People Puzzler I did the same thing and you reverted it and added it again. When People Puzzler's 3rd season renewed, some guy added the info and you reverted all of it and then edited it all on your account so it looks like YOU did it. Whenever we are editing and you revert and then re-edit it is a waste of our time. In your edit summary today you told me to go away which I am never going to do you idiot- User talk:TheBobs9 TheBobs9 (talk) 00:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- First off, insulting others won't get you anywhere. Secondly, you updated the episode count HOURS BEFORE the actual episode aired. As for the renewal, I re-added the citation so the author and such aren't a mess, like they were before. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit of "Chibiverse", as well?Inkan1969 (talk) 02:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Because it doesn't make any sense, and it's most likely false. It doesn't fit the article anyway. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- I actually saw the TV viewing and recorded it. The messed up broadcast was also widely reported.
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnKuk1XXLV0 Inkan1969 (talk) 01:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Still doesn't matter. It's not going in the article, and that's final. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Why does it not go into the article? Inkan1969 (talk) 01:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't make any sense, and doesn't pertain to the rest of the article. Stop replying to me. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:07, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- What do you mean, it doesn't make any sense? The section was about Release, and this what happened when the episode was released. The edit described what happened. Inkan1969 (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- It still doesn't matter. You don't see the Lilo & Stitch article mention the porn incident from 2012. Because that wouldn't make sense. Your contribution will never ever make it into the article, so stop bugging me for once and for all. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- What do you mean, it doesn't make any sense? The section was about Release, and this what happened when the episode was released. The edit described what happened. Inkan1969 (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't make any sense, and doesn't pertain to the rest of the article. Stop replying to me. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:07, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Why does it not go into the article? Inkan1969 (talk) 01:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Still doesn't matter. It's not going in the article, and that's final. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Inkan1969: I apologize if you've been frustrated with the above responses, and I will now warn you BrickMaster; your tone is inappropriate and combative, and this is again a warning to keep calm and cool. You aren't helping anyone getting into minor editing disputes that can be answered quickly and calmly, as I'm about to do here.
- Inkan, as the article makes clear that the first episode was uploaded to YouTube before the premiere, and as most television watching these days occurs online rather than on a channel at a stubborn time, noting channel technical faults (as terrible as they might be, and I do agree I'd be frustrated watching it that way; also I'm inclined to believe this did really happen) with its Disney Channel premiere isn't notable, as the episode was available a short time later without glitching on DisneyNow and cable on demand and likely aired trouble free on the Pacific Time Zone feed (I hope so at least). Unless there's a major technical issue that takes down a network for over a day or the episode never aired, we don't usually note that. I hope that answers why the reversion was made, and I again apologize it took so long for a proper response to your question. Nate • (chatter) 00:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)