→ESCStudent774441: new section |
Scientizzle (talk | contribs) →ESCStudent774441: what a pain |
||
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
I just reverted and blocked this user's IP who posted here. It looks like he didn't quite respond how we were hoping. Looking at what he said, he definitely placed conditions on his withdrawal of the legal threats ("I'll withdraw my legal proceedings '''''if''''' given an alternative" emphasis mine). It also appears that he has no intentions of contributing constructively, and rather, just wants to "air his grievances" wherever he can on Wikipedia. I directed the user to the unblock list, so we'll see if he does anything with that. [[User:Metros|Metros]] ([[User talk:Metros|talk]]) 11:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC) |
I just reverted and blocked this user's IP who posted here. It looks like he didn't quite respond how we were hoping. Looking at what he said, he definitely placed conditions on his withdrawal of the legal threats ("I'll withdraw my legal proceedings '''''if''''' given an alternative" emphasis mine). It also appears that he has no intentions of contributing constructively, and rather, just wants to "air his grievances" wherever he can on Wikipedia. I directed the user to the unblock list, so we'll see if he does anything with that. [[User:Metros|Metros]] ([[User talk:Metros|talk]]) 11:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:This person is a waste of time. His IP address and account have been blocked an unblocked over and over as people have given him several chances to contribute. Instead, he's wasted an extraordinary amount of time with legalese bullshit, off-topic rambling nonsense, and insults (of the veiled and not-so-veiled variety) towards those he’s run afoul. It's obvious to me that he refuses to accept [[WP:NLT]] and [[WP:FREE]] and is perfectly happy [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of ESCStudent774441|socking]] in order to continue being extremely tedious and obstinate. — [[User:Scientizzle|Scien]]''[[User talk:Scientizzle|tizzle]]'' 18:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:34, 18 April 2008
|
All admins are fallible. Wheel wars are bad. I therefore follow a 1RR rule for admin actions. If you are an admin, and you disagree with an administrative action I have taken (e.g. block, protection, deletion), then please go ahead and reverse or modify it. You don't need to try to contact me first, although a notification afterwards would be polite. If I disagree with your change, then I will seek support from a third admin to reinstate mine. If you are a non-admin reading this, and you take issue with an admin action of mine, I recommend that you raise it with me in the first instance, and take it to other admins only once you exhaust that avenue. If I have blocked you, you should probably mention my policy in any | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I hate having conversations that are split between two pages:
|
Adopting
If you want to "adopt" me on Wikipedia, feel free to do so. Contact me at (E-Mail removed for security purposes). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinni3 (talk • contribs) 08:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Response: [1]
Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
WQA: Twaz
On Twaz's talk page you stated (in reference to the WQA I filed on him) "I wish that you had drawn it to my attention earlier so that I could try to help." I'm curious about your wording. Do you intend to help a specific side, or do you intend to assess the incident in an objective manner as an uninvolved 3rd party? I am not accusing you of anything, I'm just curious as to what you meant. — scetoaux (T|C) 04:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey man. I'm going to offer an apology to the user. I know I wasn't exactly acting perfect. However, he took it a little too far. I'll correct my ways in the future. I just don't like people instigating impolite discussion when they could approach me in a proper way. Just like you, I'm fallible. And of course, I welcome corrections to my editions. Anyways, thanks for steering me in the right direction. The politics of Wiki can be overwhelming. --InvisibleDiplomat666 05:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
ESCStudent774441
I just reverted and blocked this user's IP who posted here. It looks like he didn't quite respond how we were hoping. Looking at what he said, he definitely placed conditions on his withdrawal of the legal threats ("I'll withdraw my legal proceedings if given an alternative" emphasis mine). It also appears that he has no intentions of contributing constructively, and rather, just wants to "air his grievances" wherever he can on Wikipedia. I directed the user to the unblock list, so we'll see if he does anything with that. Metros (talk) 11:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- This person is a waste of time. His IP address and account have been blocked an unblocked over and over as people have given him several chances to contribute. Instead, he's wasted an extraordinary amount of time with legalese bullshit, off-topic rambling nonsense, and insults (of the veiled and not-so-veiled variety) towards those he’s run afoul. It's obvious to me that he refuses to accept WP:NLT and WP:FREE and is perfectly happy socking in order to continue being extremely tedious and obstinate. — Scientizzle 18:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)