Black Future (talk | contribs) →April 2022: Reply Tag: Reply |
Black Future (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:What a joke this site has become. '''''BLKFTR''''' <small>([[User talk:Black Future|tlk2meh]])</small> 13:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC) |
:What a joke this site has become. '''''BLKFTR''''' <small>([[User talk:Black Future|tlk2meh]])</small> 13:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC) |
||
Holy shit what kind of demented report is that? Half the claims against me are dead links or lies if I'm reading that right, the one guy brings up edit warring on a topic from a month ago that I a) extensively used the talk page for and b) reached consensus. Is this for real? I contribute, use the talk page, and engage in constructive edits, and a tag team of anti-Ukraine trolls just blanket revert and block me? This is seriously fucked up. --'''''BLKFTR''''' <small>([[User talk:Black Future|tlk2meh]])</small> 13:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:49, 28 April 2022
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
I have created a request to apply discretionary sanctions to you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Black Future. Please reply there if you wish.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
Your recent editing history at Stepan Bandera shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GizzyCatBella🍁 07:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bishonen | tålk 21:49, 27 April 2022 (UTC)- If you wish to reply to Ymblanter's report at WP:AE, you can do so here (below) and somebody will move it to AE. (Not me for the next 9 hours, because I'm just going to bed, but hopefully somebody.) Bishonen | tålk 21:51, 27 April 2022 (UTC).
- What a joke this site has become. BLKFTR (tlk2meh) 13:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Holy shit what kind of demented report is that? Half the claims against me are dead links or lies if I'm reading that right, the one guy brings up edit warring on a topic from a month ago that I a) extensively used the talk page for and b) reached consensus. Is this for real? I contribute, use the talk page, and engage in constructive edits, and a tag team of anti-Ukraine trolls just blanket revert and block me? This is seriously fucked up. --BLKFTR (tlk2meh) 13:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)