Hodja Nasreddin (talk | contribs) →Blocked: response. Offliner, please place this notice somewere else. |
Nanobear~enwiki (talk | contribs) →Blocked: this is exactly the right place for such notice, so please do not remove |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::I thought it is common practice not to punish users who made ''two'' reverts in the same article. I saw this numerous times at 3RR. I debated the issues at the article talk page with YMB ''and'' Bobbani. I am really surprised how fast you jumped to the gun (in a couple of minutes!) missing a number of previous reports and not allowing me and YMB to tell anything at all at the 3RR. I am sorry for creating problems. I hope this block will still be reviewed by another administrator? Thank you.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys#top|talk]]) 04:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC) |
::I thought it is common practice not to punish users who made ''two'' reverts in the same article. I saw this numerous times at 3RR. I debated the issues at the article talk page with YMB ''and'' Bobbani. I am really surprised how fast you jumped to the gun (in a couple of minutes!) missing a number of previous reports and not allowing me and YMB to tell anything at all at the 3RR. I am sorry for creating problems. I hope this block will still be reviewed by another administrator? Thank you.[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys#top|talk]]) 04:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Biophys has been edit warring recently at [[Russian apartment bombings]] as well, where he made 3 reverts in 24h on 13 September (and more later): [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russian_apartment_bombings&diff=313476562&oldid=313366472][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russian_apartment_bombings&diff=313575124&oldid=313515939][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russian_apartment_bombings&diff=313593386&oldid=313582213]. I was thinking of reporting him, but now he is already blocked for edit warring elsewhere, so I won't. This should be taken into account. [[User:Offliner|Offliner]] ([[User talk:Offliner|talk]]) 04:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:50, 15 September 2009
Blocked
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 04:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
Hodja Nasreddin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I made only '''two''' reverts in this article during last 24 hours and debated all issues with two users (YMB and Bobbani) at this article talk page, as should be clear from the diffs I provided at 3RR |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I made only '''two''' reverts in this article during last 24 hours and debated all issues with two users (YMB and Bobbani) at this article talk page, as should be clear from the diffs I provided at 3RR |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I made only '''two''' reverts in this article during last 24 hours and debated all issues with two users (YMB and Bobbani) at this article talk page, as should be clear from the diffs I provided at 3RR |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- 3RR is not an entitlement. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 04:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- I thought it is common practice not to punish users who made two reverts in the same article. I saw this numerous times at 3RR. I debated the issues at the article talk page with YMB and Bobbani. I am really surprised how fast you jumped to the gun (in a couple of minutes!) missing a number of previous reports and not allowing me and YMB to tell anything at all at the 3RR. I am sorry for creating problems. I hope this block will still be reviewed by another administrator? Thank you.Biophys (talk) 04:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Biophys has been edit warring recently at Russian apartment bombings as well, where he made 3 reverts in 24h on 13 September (and more later): [1][2][3]. I was thinking of reporting him, but now he is already blocked for edit warring elsewhere, so I won't. This should be taken into account. Offliner (talk) 04:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)