Content deleted Content added
Binksternet (talk | contribs) →We Can Do It!: replies |
→Juan Manuel de Rosas: new section |
||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
Hi. I noticed you have commented at [[Juan Manuel de Rosas]]. There is [[Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Juan_Manuel_de_Rosas|a DRN case related to that article]]. I'm trying to help out as a neutral Third Opinion-giver, to achieve a resolution. Any assistance you can provide would be appreciated. --[[User:Noleander|Noleander]] ([[User talk:Noleander|talk]]) 18:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. I noticed you have commented at [[Juan Manuel de Rosas]]. There is [[Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Juan_Manuel_de_Rosas|a DRN case related to that article]]. I'm trying to help out as a neutral Third Opinion-giver, to achieve a resolution. Any assistance you can provide would be appreciated. --[[User:Noleander|Noleander]] ([[User talk:Noleander|talk]]) 18:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Okay, I'll look at it. It seems plain that some pro-Rosas views are dominating to the detriment of a more balanced view. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet#top|talk]]) 18:16, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |
:Okay, I'll look at it. It seems plain that some pro-Rosas views are dominating to the detriment of a more balanced view. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet#top|talk]]) 18:16, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Juan Manuel de Rosas == |
|||
Every single book in English says that Rosas was a dictator who ruled through Terrorist tactics. There isn't any that says otherwise. Cambalachero has failed to provide one source that might back his claims. Not one. And even if he had done, why should the prevailing, overwhelming view among historians be given the same weight as one or two Revisionist historians? --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 19:01, 9 January 2013 (UTC) |