Billy Hathorn (talk | contribs) |
Sven Manguard (talk | contribs) →CCI Notice: You ''cannot'' take photographs of other people's work and then upload those photographs as "own work". |
||
Line 350: | Line 350: | ||
:I have committed no copyright violations; this is a red herring. The most recent violation alleged, Bill Noel, failed to be proved. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 04:49, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
:I have committed no copyright violations; this is a red herring. The most recent violation alleged, Bill Noel, failed to be proved. [[User:Billy Hathorn|Billy Hathorn]] ([[User talk:Billy Hathorn#top|talk]]) 04:49, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
::I'm sorry you feel that way, but I disagree. At least with images, you have committed plenty of copyright violations. On the subject of images, let me be frank: |
|||
:::You ''cannot'' take photographs of other people's work and then upload those photographs as "own work". It's not just disingenuous, it's a violation of copyright, and Wikipedia cannot tolerate such behavior. You need to describe, in detail, where the image was taken, who created the original work, and what copyright status the original work has. If you don't know the answer to any of those three questions, you shouldn't upload the image. If you do know the answer to each of those three questions, it needs to go into a [[:Template:Information]] template. If the copyright status of the origional work is more restrictive than you're release (i.e. if it's still copyrighted) then your photo has to be treated as fair use rather than free use, regardless of anything else. It dosen't matter if you took the photo, your act of taking the photo does not erase the copyright that was already there. I strongly recommend that you cease uploading photographs of other photographs/books/museum displays. The rest of your images are fine, you're only getting into trouble (in images) with this one subset of works. 07:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[Herman Farr]] for deletion == |
== Nomination of [[Herman Farr]] for deletion == |
Revision as of 07:58, 3 August 2011
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Welcome!
Hello, Billy Hathorn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — RJN 04:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
|
DYK? issue
Possibly unfree File:Shed Road mural in Bossier City, LA IMG 0925.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shed Road mural in Bossier City, LA IMG 0925.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Randy Wiggums
Possibly unfree File:Hollywood Theaters, Laredo, TX IMG 2017.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hollywood Theaters, Laredo, TX IMG 2017.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
PROD
Discussion invitation
As a respected WP editor, you are invited to participate in the following discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde Lucas (2nd nomination)
DYK for Robert C. Snyder
Calmer Waters 00:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Bill Noël
The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Mayhew Foster
Calmer Waters 00:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- He is now featured on Portal:Germany! If you have another fact related to Germany - however distantly - please feel free to place it there yourself, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Forest Shely
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Charles Franklin Hildebrand
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Ralph Waldo Emerson Jones
Hello! Your submission of Ralph Waldo Emerson Jones at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:37, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Mureybet DYK
Hi! Thanks for reviewing my hook on Template talk:Did you know#Mureybet. However, I saw that you changed the wording of the hook and you forgot to notify me about that. Can you tell me on the DYK page why you think your wording is better than mine? Thanks! --Zoeperkoe (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Images at E.S. Richardson Elementary School
Hi there. A number of images at E.S. Richardson Elementary School were uploaded by you with the text "I own the photo". I'd like for you to clarify that. Are you the photographer of those photos themselves, or do you own a copy of a document where those photos were printed, or did you photograph a photograph? Thank you for your time. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I own the photo from a elementary school booklet. The photographer, Stanley Quade, is deceased. I scanned the photos and uploaded them. Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Err... owning a copy of a photo does not mean you own the photo itself. Quade would have to be decased several decades before the work exited copyright, 70 to 100 years depending on the jurisdiction. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Southwest Collection, Lubbock, TX IMG 0015.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Southwest Collection, Lubbock, TX IMG 0015.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- It is a poster in the front entrance to the Southwest Collection Library. Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Howard K. Smith of Ferriday, LA IMG 1222.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Howard K. Smith of Ferriday, LA IMG 1222.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- There are two dozen images at that discussion link, you really need to come over and help explain this. Please head over to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 9 as soon as possible. Thank you, Sven Manguard Wha? 03:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Ann B. Warner IMG 1211.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ann B. Warner IMG 1211.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- It is a picture of a photo at the Delta Music Museum in Ferriday, LA, taken three years ago. Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- So? What does that have to do with the copyright of the original photo and whether or not you are the actual creator and sole copyright holder? If you didn't take the original photo, why on earth did you license it as your own work? Infrogmation (talk) 21:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Grant Speed
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Images again
Hi. Have you looked at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_July_9#About_two_dozen_of_User:Billy_Hathorn.27s_uploads yet? You might wish to do so and comment there.
I thought this has been explained to you, both here and on Commons, more than once. None the less, I'll try to do so once again: If you take a photo of a photo which someone else took, from a legal and copyright perspective, it is NOT your photo. It is a copy of the photo someone else took. From a legal and copyright standpoint, you have zero rights to claim it as your own work. You have no right to license it. Claiming such photos of someone else's photos are your own work is a falsehood.
Is that clear? If any of it is not, PLEASE ask for an explanation of any part that you don't fully understand. If you wish to read more on the subject, I suggest Wikipedia:Copyrights, Derivative work, and Commons:Derivative works.
Having multiple cases of such images in your uploads is a problem both for Wikimedia and for you. For Wikimedia, it opens up the possibility of legal actions for copyright infringement as well as hurting Wikimedia's reputation for accuracy and reliability. It hurts you by giving you a reputation for making false claims, and casts doubt on all your contributions as someone who doesn't care about getting things anywhere close to right. I therefore ask you most sincerely to PLEASE take this matter seriously. I would urge you take action: hunt down as well as you can any and all images which are derivative or potential copyright problems (meaning photos you took of some photo which was taken by someone else, but which you claim or license as your "own work"). Tag them for speedy deletion.
I am an admin both here on Wikipedia and on Wikimedia Commons. If I can be of any assistance, please let me know. Thanks for your attention, Infrogmation (talk) 22:00, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I wrote the comments under each photo Friday night. These were posted three years ago.Billy Hathorn (talk) 22:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Your comments on the photo pages don't really address the problem: they are still tagged as your original work with you as the sole copyright holder. I suggest you reply on the deletion request page, and add your vote for deletion of any and all "photos of someone else's photo" listed there. (Feel free to add a comment, eg "oops, sorry I didn't understand about derivative photos back in 2008", or whatever is the case.) If any of the images listed actually are your own original work (no photo taken by anyone else seen anywhere in what you photographed), note that they are exceptions and can be kept. Hope this helps. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 00:25, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- I went into each photo under edit and explained the situation. Three, Tommy Spinks, Bill Dodd, and W.E. Whetstone can be saved because they are from a university annual prior to 1978 and not under copyright. When I said "I own the photo" I meant it was in my yearbook that I had purchased. I did not understand about derivative photos then. I thought the RCA logo photo from the museum predates the 70-year cutoff on copyright. Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Some of those should come under "fair use" too, but I don't recall which ones off hand. Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for George T. Walker
Hi Billy, I just have a quick comment that I left at your nomination at T:TDYK. Could you give me some feedback so I can approve your hook? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:48, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Robert W. Glover
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Edit conflict at DYK
THanks for approving Pole Creek Wilderness, but we edit conflicted when you did so. You see, the next article I worked is North Fork Owyhee Wilderness and they are geographically very close and what the references say about them is almost identical. Can you indicate you approve both or have a concern with the newest one, and also pick which photo you feel is best? Personally I like the North Fork one better. thanks. PumpkinSky talk 01:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Welcome sign at Maid of the Mist IMG 1360.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Welcome sign at Maid of the Mist IMG 1360.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'll be listing a number of additional files of yours there shortly. Consider this notification for all the nominations. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Lundy's Lane Museum sign IMG 1489.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lundy's Lane Museum sign IMG 1489.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- I've never understood how a sign identifying a public building could be a copyright violation? Billy Hathorn (talk) 04:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Purple Heart Trail on I-35 IMG 1065.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Purple Heart Trail on I-35 IMG 1065.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Forest Hill Community High School alumni
Category:Forest Hill Community High School alumni, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bobherry (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for George T. Walker
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I see that the John K. Snyder article says that he went to Georgia Tech and left (presumably around 1947). Do you have a reference I could use to cite that? —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- I don't recall the source; the article was written before in-line citations were required for Wikipedia articles. It should be in some of the citations at the bottom of the article unless it came from a telephone conversation with John K. Snyder, Jr. Billy Hathorn (talk)
- This could be the source: "Snyder Dies", Alexandria Daily Town Talk, January 12, 1993. Billy Hathorn (talk) 17:12, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK
Hello! Your submission of Article at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Truthkeeper88 (talk) 02:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK Eddie J Lambert
Hello! Your submission of Eddie J. Lambert at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NickDupree (talk) 19:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Ralph Waldo Emerson Jones
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Alan Seabaugh. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Cognate247 (talk) 01:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Wayne Christian
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- You may want to see this: Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Daily_DYK_scandal.--Milowent • talkblp-r 03:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- I hope you're now aware that we don't do this sort of thing on Wikipedia-- well, at least we're not supposed to-- I don't know how or why it got through DYK, but please take greater care in the future. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for John E. Guinn
Thank you Victuallers (talk) 08:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Hollis Downs
Gatoclass (talk) 16:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- I see the problem continues-- some POV tags on these articles might be useful. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- FWIW, I don't see the POV issues here at all. (Given that Sandy hasn't actually added a tag or made any changes to the article, I don't know that he/she really does either.) But I do agree with Sandy more broadly that your articles, especially DYK noms, need work on including more reliable sourcing; you and I discussed this issue on a previous nom if I recall. I do hope you'll continue to contribute to expanding this area though, just with these concerns in mind. Thanks for your work, and cheers, -- Khazar (talk) 04:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Bodi White
EncycloPetey (talk) 08:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Hunter Greene
Hello! Your submission of Hunter Greene at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler (talk) 13:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Gordon Dove (Louisiana politician)
Hello! Your submission of Gordon Dove (Louisiana politician) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Brett Geymann
EncycloPetey (talk) 16:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK discussion
You've been mentioned a few times at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Daily DYK scandal - you may wish to comment. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Chuck Kleckley
Another nomination promoted by the DYK project. Well done. Victuallers (talk) 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
About your editing
Please familiarize yourself with the following pages:
Every article of yours I have looked at is built on non-reliable sources and contains close paraphrasing, plagiarism, BLP violations, and non-reliable sources. If these issues continue, and if DYK chooses to continue to feature these policy breaches on the mainpage, I will ask independent admins to look into your editing. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hey Billy, content contribution is like white water rafting a bit - too close to sources and we veer close to copyvio, too far and it's into OR or synthesis. I am thinking we just need to steer a bit further from wording at sources. I have done a bit here and there. If you have any questions on how something can be worded differently, just ask and I will try to come up with something. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 15:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Thomas G. Carmody
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Plagiarism documented in the discussion at WT:DYK. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia Talk:Did you know
Hi Billy. I wanted to let you know that there is a discussion regarding some of your editing at the DYK talk page. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Calmhead mate with the DYKs. Its not a competition!! You've suddenly even passed Geschichte!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- What is the problem here? I wrote some articles on state legislators, all properly sourced and documented. I can't imagine someone spending his timne challenging these little artcles? No one except myself has ever found errors in any of my articles. None of the subjects to my knowledge has complained. It's not plagirism to rewrite someone else's words and given that person as the source. I won't be available for another ten days on Wikipedia. Billy Hathorn (talk) 11:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Bill Noël
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Bill Noël, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/fno26; see talk, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Bill Noël and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Bill Noël, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Bill Noël with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Bill Noël. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at . Leave a note at Talk:Bill Noël saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not a copyright violation. Material is paraphrased and properly sourced and documented from several sources. Billy Hathorn (talk) 11:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Invite
Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism. Simply click here to accept! – Lionel (talk) 02:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC) |
CCI Notice
Hello, Billy Hathorn. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. cmadler (talk) 12:56, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have committed no copyright violations; this is a red herring. The most recent violation alleged, Bill Noel, failed to be proved. Billy Hathorn (talk) 04:49, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you feel that way, but I disagree. At least with images, you have committed plenty of copyright violations. On the subject of images, let me be frank:
- You cannot take photographs of other people's work and then upload those photographs as "own work". It's not just disingenuous, it's a violation of copyright, and Wikipedia cannot tolerate such behavior. You need to describe, in detail, where the image was taken, who created the original work, and what copyright status the original work has. If you don't know the answer to any of those three questions, you shouldn't upload the image. If you do know the answer to each of those three questions, it needs to go into a Template:Information template. If the copyright status of the origional work is more restrictive than you're release (i.e. if it's still copyrighted) then your photo has to be treated as fair use rather than free use, regardless of anything else. It dosen't matter if you took the photo, your act of taking the photo does not erase the copyright that was already there. I strongly recommend that you cease uploading photographs of other photographs/books/museum displays. The rest of your images are fine, you're only getting into trouble (in images) with this one subset of works. 07:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you feel that way, but I disagree. At least with images, you have committed plenty of copyright violations. On the subject of images, let me be frank:
Nomination of Herman Farr for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Herman Farr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herman Farr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Karanacs (talk) 15:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Virginia Martinez (Louisiana politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virginia Martinez (Louisiana politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia Martinez (Louisiana politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Karanacs (talk) 15:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Bruce (Texas journalist) Karanacs (talk) 17:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dublin Dr Pepper IMG 0959.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Dublin Dr Pepper IMG 0959.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)