Hello, BiasReverter, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 03:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
June 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aegean dispute. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--- ❖ SilentResident ❖ (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 15:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- My edits are not disruptive in the least. The small section I deleted was false. It makes it seem like Turkey is part of the same agreement but has a different "unique interpretation" of the agreement. This seriously makes no sense and is very misleading. Turkey does not need such an interpretation, they are not disputing what the agreement says. They have no reason to, they never signed any agreement. Also choosing to use "refused" instead of "decline" is misleading, as it has a slight nuance of refusing to do a required or obliged action. Turkey has every right to not sign any agreement that they are requested to join.
- In your edit summary you said Turkey's view is that islands cannot have an EEZ shelf, etc. which is true. But that's not what the section I deleted says. It says Turkey's view is a "unique interpretation" of the agreement which they did not sign. That is why it is misleading and should stay deleted. Besides "Turkey's view" is literally already mentioned in the above paragraph, there's no need to rewrite it misleadingly. BiasReverter (talk) 15:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)