FlightTime (talk | contribs) Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. Tag: Twinkle |
Beyond My Ken (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
::::Please indent your comments correctly. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 00:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
::::Please indent your comments correctly. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 00:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::::Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Ownership of content|onership of articles]], you do good work, until someone changes something you don't like, you've been like this for years. Have you not learned anything from your <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Beyond%20My%20Ken&type=block block log].</span> ? - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#1C0978">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 00:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
:::::Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Ownership of content|onership of articles]], you do good work, until someone changes something you don't like, you've been like this for years. Have you not learned anything from your <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Beyond%20My%20Ken&type=block block log].</span> ? - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:FlightTime|<span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:FlightTime|<span style="color:#1C0978">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 00:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::::::Please see any AMERICAN ENGLISH dictionary, you will see that "improvise" is given. Check this article from Grammarist at [https://grammarist.com/spelling/improvise-vs-improvize/]: |
|||
::::::::<blockquote>'''Is It Improvise or Improvize?'''{{pb}}The correct spelling in all official dictionaries is improvise. Many might think that improvise is the British English spelling, while improvize is the American English spelling. This spelling pattern is common among words like realize, analyze, organize, stabilize, and criticize.{{pb}}These examples are simply a matter of preference or referring to a house style. But when it comes to improvise, the spelling has no alternatives.{{pb}}Even American English dictionaries list improvise as the correct spelling. It’s like the word exercise, which cannot be exercize, or supervise, which cannot be supervize. Other examples of verbs that always end in -ise are advertise, compromise, devise, disguise, and revise.{{pb}}Other words derived from improvise include improviser, improvisatory, and improvisation. The word improv also exists, which means the art form of creating a scene on stage without a script.</blockquote> [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken#top|talk]]) 00:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
Revision as of 00:55, 23 April 2023
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 09:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
@Doug Weller: Thanks. I took a quick look at it and will delve into it as soon as I can. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Nazi book burnings
FYI you can disagree without threatening a block! I've posted on the talk page though, as one of the bullet points is a copy-paste from the source and the section generally feels off .Citing (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- I am not an admin, I cannot "threaten" a block. I can, however, warn you of behavior that -- in my experience -- I forsee as potentially leading to a block. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Notable deaths at Adventist Health Glendale
I wanted the notable deaths to be back on the Adventist Health Glendale page. Is this possible if it would be put back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4980:90:84BF:FF77:9ADF:CC2 (talk) 23:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Not without a new consensus it's not Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.ARamadan-WMF (talk) 12:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Additional Sources Tag
Regarding this revert, aren't maintenance tags supposed to go at the top of an article? TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 23:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Communism as a subcategory of totalitarianism
There is a consensus on Category talk:Communism that Communism should not be a subcat of authoritarianism and two editors have now reverted your change. Stop doing this. Schierbecker (talk) 03:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democratic Party and Republican Party.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- My thanks to whomever fixed this. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
I am opposed to adding communist parties to the list that are not described as "neo-nationalist" in the source. Mureungdowon (talk) 00:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- You canceled my editing without participating in talk. Join the talk. Mureungdowon (talk) 09:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- You restored your edits without a consensus to do so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- What is the standard for 'consensus' you mean? You're the only one who's opposed to my editing in this article to date. Give your opinion on Talk why you think Kim Jong-un and the communist ruling parties are neo-nationalist. If you look at your 'Category:Communism' edit, you just have a perception that communists are authoritarian and unjust ideologies. So you edit to demonize the communists and link them to other negative ideologies. Wikipedia should be written in NPOV. I don't support communism either. However, are there any sources that communist ruling parties and Kim Jong-un are neo-nationalist (except China) ?Mureungdowon (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- You restored your edits without a consensus to do so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
This discussion is over on my talk page. Discussion must take place on the article talk page, not here, Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- You have to talk to me on the Talk page of the Neo-nationalism article. Otherwise there's no reason for you to reverse my editing. Mureungdowon (talk) 03:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- I have commented there. You must justify your deletion, which do not have consensus Do not post here again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- You commented once, but with non-sequiturs, refusing to discuss the issue and to attempt to make consensus, instead just asserting that @Mureungdowon didn't have it, even though you two were the only users in the discussion. Harry Sibelius (talk) 03:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- I have commented there. You must justify your deletion, which do not have consensus Do not post here again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Angry white man
Hi, would you mind discussing the rationale for your revert? Talk page section is Talk:Angry white man#See alsos. Many thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
World War II and the history of Jews in Poland: Arbitration case opened
Hello Beyond My Ken,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 04, 2023, which is when the first evidence phase closes. Submitted evidence will be summarized by Arbitrators and Clerks at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland/Evidence/Summary. Owing to the summary style, editors are encouraged to submit evidence in small chunks sooner rather than more complete evidence later.
Details about the summary page, the two phases of evidence, a timeline and other answers to frequently asked questions can be found at the case's FAQ page.
For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Quoted
I've quoted you in my recent evidence statement at ArbCom here. Due to word limitations, I only quoted a part of your statement. I hope it is ok with you. If you think I am misquoting you or that I misunderstood your point, please let me know and I'll refactor what I wrote or strike the quote out. As someone subject to being misquoted, I certainly don't want to do it myself to anyone. (To be clear, you are not a party and you are in no danger of being sanctioned for anything). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for letting me know. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Toplessness (revision 1148063744)
Hello Beyond My Ken, I replaced the photo in question with a computer generated image (via Stable Diffusion) with it in mind that the individual pictured may not know that they are represented in this encyclopaedia/in this article/in this manner. I'm not censorious, nor am I particularly interested in the topic (mostly doing work on art, architecture, design, and culture related articles), just thought it might be courteous to use an image of a "person" who definitely won't care one way or the other. Perhaps I should have explained this on the Talk page. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
PS: Cross-posted to article Talk page. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Leo Frank
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Harry Sibelius (talk) 03:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Socks
They're being CU'd DeCausa (talk) 21:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, I was just in the middle of filing an SPI. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm thinking MEAT may prove more likely. DeCausa (talk) 22:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm heading in that direction as well. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm thinking MEAT may prove more likely. DeCausa (talk) 22:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Hostility
Hello Beyond My Ken. Why is it every single time we disagree (for now, on about two talk pages) that you take such a hostile stance against my posts, regardless how minor or intense the issue is? I feel like you do not really abide to WP:AGF sometimes. Like that time. –Vipz (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- I take an opposing (not "hostile") stance against your position, not against you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Regarding Talk:Far-right politics#Lead image removal, if you're fine, I'd like to abide by my request to not go off-topic there, and see one of our user talk pages as more appropriate for discussing contents of my edit summary:
- You were explaining to me something I am very aware of and even stated myself on the relevant post on that article's talk page. In addition, you explained it to me in such a way that already assumes I am arguing there needs to be a "balance" between the two articles (I don't and there doesn't).
- I intentionally and deliberately did not repeat that part of my edit summary in the talk section. Edit summaries cannot be edited after the fact. It's as if you resurrected the edit summary's weakest content just to dunk on it... –Vipz (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- You brought up the subject -- it doesn't matter that it was in an edit summary -- which makes it a legitimate topic of discussion.Please don't post on my talk page about this any further, discussion about the article should take place on the article's talk page, not here. If you think I've breached Wikipedia's civility policies, report me to an administrator or to ANI. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Horst Wessel article
Regarding your objection to the use of the term "bruiser".
We should be using encyclopaedic language here and "tough guy" is decidedly not that. It belongs in old films or detective novels. I thought long and hard over this one. As the article uses American spelling, I consulted two American dictionaries for a more formal term. Merriam Webster does not list tough guy. Dictionary.com does and I opted for one of its synonyms: bruiser -- one who causes bruises, which seemed apt for this partiocular character. Merriam also lists bruiser. I hesitated slightly over "thug" as it may have emotive overtones. If you have a better suggestion, feel free to use it but, please, do not reinstate "tough guy". Freeman501 (talk) 23:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- "Tough guy" derives fro one of the sources, Evans, which describes him as "a well-known local tough". It is therefore an appropriate description. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Please use civil language
@Beyond My Ken:, I suggest you to use civil language, don't be aggressive, be polite and humble. I'm willing to follow WP rules but no rules made by you. Your language seems highly offensive. I alredy said, I understand what you want to say, so no further argument, bye.Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 09:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- I suggest that you stop writing articles for English Wikipedia, as your level of English capability is well below the "basic" you claim on your talk page, to the extent that you are not able to write clear, grammatically correct sentences and paragraphs. This is required by a Wikipedia policy: WP:Competence is required. Your English competence is not sufficient to be writing articles here. Please try writing articles for your native language Wikipedia instead, where I'm sure you will be of service. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, and please stop filing frivolous reports on AN/I as well. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Humphrey Bogart
Instead of mass-pinging you with a dozen "thanks," one for each edit, I want to thank you for your recent work on the Humphrey Bogart page. The page looks a lot cleaner now. Madam Fatal (talk) 14:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, I really appreciate it! Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Singin in the Rain
Accidentally hit the vandalism button. My apologies, I have no intention to start a revert war. Nohomersryan (talk) 19:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks for the explanation. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
FWIW...
Sam stays in Middle-Earth. It's Bilbo and Frodo who sail away. – .Raven .talk 17:17, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- See Appendix A, "Later Events Concerns the Members of the Fellowship of the Ring", S.R. 1482 (F.O. 82); or Foster's The Complete Guide to Middle-Earth (1978), p.435. As a ring-bearer (if only for a short time) he is given the privilege of passing over the sea. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- But not in the body of the novel, nor in the 3rd Jackson film. At their ends he returns from the harbor to his wife and children: "Well, I'm home." – .Raven .talk 03:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Of course the film is an adaptation of the trilogy, and is not canon. The Appendices, however, are canon. But yes, your point that my other references were to the novels is well taken. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Spoiler warnings would of course apply to both novel and fim. – .Raven .talk 08:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Right. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Spoiler warnings would of course apply to both novel and fim. – .Raven .talk 08:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Of course the film is an adaptation of the trilogy, and is not canon. The Appendices, however, are canon. But yes, your point that my other references were to the novels is well taken. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- But not in the body of the novel, nor in the 3rd Jackson film. At their ends he returns from the harbor to his wife and children: "Well, I'm home." – .Raven .talk 03:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Please, read:
At various times these terms were applied, in particular, to Tsar Nicholas II and the Imperial family, aristocrats, the bourgeoisie, clerics, business entrepreneurs, anarchists, kulaks, monarchists, Mensheviks, Esers, Bundists, Trotskyists, Bukharinists, the "old Bolsheviks", the army and police, emigrants, saboteurs, wreckers (вредители, "vrediteli"), "social parasites" (тунеядцы, "tuneyadtsy"), Kavezhedists (people who administered and serviced the KVZhD (China Far East Railway), particularly the Russian population of Harbin, China), those considered bourgeois nationalists (notably Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, Armenian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Estonian nationalists, Zionists, Basmachi).[1] 94.131.100.213 (talk) 23:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but during Stalin's reign, it was applied very often to Trotsky. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Source? And why trotsky should be emphasized? I can provide tons of sources where it was used against the clergy or anarchists. 94.131.100.213 (talk) 23:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- You are actively pushing your POV right now, and that is regrettable. 94.131.100.213 (talk) 23:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Discussion of this matter will cease taking place here, and will take place on the article talk page, where it should have been in the first place 23:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Incidentally, you just cited a permanently dead link to support your argument. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- I started a discussion. If you do not provide sources that this term was used so excessively against Trotsky compared to others, that it deserves mentioning him in the lead, I’m creating an account and reporting you to admins. 94.131.100.213 (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Looking at your block history, you tend to disregard warnings and edit war anyway. 94.131.100.213 (talk) 00:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- It takes two to tango, don't it? Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Honestly, it isn’t worth my time. Have it your way with your beloved Trotsky. 94.131.100.213 (talk) 00:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- You started a discussion in the wrong place. Discussions about article content belog on the articler talk page, not on a user's talk page. I have started a discussion there, where it is appropriate. Do not post here again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
References
Left-wing fascism
I don't think I made myself clear, so I will try again. Yes, you could make an argument that a coffee mug is a fruit, but the mere existence of the (fatuous) argument does not mean that any attention should be paid to it. Similarly, one could make an argument that any group was left-wing, but he mere existence of the (fatuous) argument does not mean that any attention should be paid to it. TFD (talk) 03:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I agree with that, so I guess I misunderstood what you were saying. Onward and upward, Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Procedural notification
Hi, I and others have proposed additional options at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#RfC_on_a_procedural_community_desysop. You may wish to review your position in that RfC. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Ernst Röhm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:German_LGBT_people if what you wrote is true, the whole category makes no sense because they can all be dumped into the century subcategory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.21.243.42 (talk) 07:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- What I wrote is completely accurate, that's how categorization works. The "politician" category is a sub-cat of the "people" cat. Sure it can be "dumped" into the parent cat, but then articles wouldn't be labelled as "German LGBT politicians". Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- and there is a sub category based on century and there what you are saying is not done, in which case all those in the category should be taken away because they are in or should be in the sub category of century. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.21.243.42 (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- You clearly don't understand categorization. Please see Wikipedia:Categorization dos and don'ts or ask questions at [[WP::WikiProject Categories]] or WP:Teahouse. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- and there is a sub category based on century and there what you are saying is not done, in which case all those in the category should be taken away because they are in or should be in the sub category of century. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.21.243.42 (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Valda Setterfield/David Gordon
Hello, I've noticed you've been reverting edits to the articles on David Gordon and Valda Setterfield. My edits, at least, were completely in line with the document guidelines for infoboxes on Template:Infobox person. "New York City, U.S.", for example, is literally the formatting that the document recommends:
Omit unnecessary or redundant details. For example, it is not necessary to state: New York City, New York, United States when New York City, U.S. conveys essentially the same information more concisely.
The removal of the marriage template on both articles is, I suppose, a matter of preference, but there is a way to include the exact dates of a marriage using Template:Marriage, as demonstrated in the article and currently with my edits at Valda Setterfield.
If you have objections to the specific nature of any information I may have added to the article, please let me know. But all you did with your hair-trigger reversions was remove relevant categories and citations to remove CN tags. Calling my edits "near vandalism" because, in your opinion, they were "better before" is simply not constructive.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Your edits removed information from the infoboxes, replacing more specific information with generalized information. Please do not do this again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: Again, please read Template:Infobox person, specifically the section I quoted above. Sunshineisles2 (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
"""Do not make those changes to the inforbox again, please. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Beyond My Ken: You are literally not responding to any of my comments where I point to why my edits are completely in line with standard practice. I would be happy to have a constructive conversation about this matter, but it's a two-way street. Sunshineisles2 (talk) 00:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Your edits did not improve the article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE observes that "The less information [an infobox] contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance". (This is also what is linked to in the section of Template:Infobox person that I have been referring to this entire time). The specific neighborhoods that David Gordon lived and died in are information that can be dispersed, as necessary, in the text of the article. I fail to see why we need to include that immediately from the jump, when simply pointing out the city-level place of his birth and death is perfectly sufficient at explaining at-a-glance information about his life. Sunshineisles2 (talk) 00:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Your edits did not improve the article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
David Gordon (choreographer)
Go editwar somewhere else. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- "Improvise" in American Englsih is spelled with an "s". I am unaware of any variety of English in which it is spelled with a "z". Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Stop fucking with this article, or ANI, your choice. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please indent your comments correctly. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please stop your onership of articles, you do good work, until someone changes something you don't like, you've been like this for years. Have you not learned anything from your block log. ? - FlightTime (open channel) 00:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please see any AMERICAN ENGLISH dictionary, you will see that "improvise" is given. Check this article from Grammarist at [1]:
Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Is It Improvise or Improvize?
The correct spelling in all official dictionaries is improvise. Many might think that improvise is the British English spelling, while improvize is the American English spelling. This spelling pattern is common among words like realize, analyze, organize, stabilize, and criticize.
These examples are simply a matter of preference or referring to a house style. But when it comes to improvise, the spelling has no alternatives.
Even American English dictionaries list improvise as the correct spelling. It’s like the word exercise, which cannot be exercize, or supervise, which cannot be supervize. Other examples of verbs that always end in -ise are advertise, compromise, devise, disguise, and revise.
Other words derived from improvise include improviser, improvisatory, and improvisation. The word improv also exists, which means the art form of creating a scene on stage without a script.
- Please see any AMERICAN ENGLISH dictionary, you will see that "improvise" is given. Check this article from Grammarist at [1]:
- Please stop your onership of articles, you do good work, until someone changes something you don't like, you've been like this for years. Have you not learned anything from your block log. ? - FlightTime (open channel) 00:49, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please indent your comments correctly. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Stop fucking with this article, or ANI, your choice. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Beyond_My_Ken reported by User:FlightTime (Result: ). Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)