You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war on Murovdag. Tag: Twinkle |
No edit summary |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== October 2020 == |
== October 2020 == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Murovdag]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 22:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Murovdag]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 22:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
||
{{unblock|reason=I apologize what I did, I understand it now. I will be more cautious next time. I request to be unblocked, but I will avoid to edit Azerbaijan related topics until my block expires. Thanks in advance. [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur#top|talk]]) 14:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 14:36, 4 October 2020
|
Your GA nomination of Karsakpay inscription
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Karsakpay inscription you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 06:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Karsakpay inscription
The article Karsakpay inscription you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Karsakpay inscription for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 21:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 16:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Ah dear. Beshogur (talk) 17:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Beshogur reported by User:Khirurg (Result: ). Thank you. Khirurg (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. signed, Rosguill talk 22:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Beshogur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I apologize what I did, I understand it now. I will be more cautious next time. I request to be unblocked, but I will avoid to edit Azerbaijan related topics until my block expires. Thanks in advance. [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur#top|talk]]) 14:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologize what I did, I understand it now. I will be more cautious next time. I request to be unblocked, but I will avoid to edit Azerbaijan related topics until my block expires. Thanks in advance. [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur#top|talk]]) 14:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologize what I did, I understand it now. I will be more cautious next time. I request to be unblocked, but I will avoid to edit Azerbaijan related topics until my block expires. Thanks in advance. [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur#top|talk]]) 14:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}